Of all of the largest/most important nations...

>of all of the largest/most important nations, only 4 of their leaders are not tied down by major domestic/near-domestic issues/problems/crises

>Xi
>Putin
>Modi
>Bibi

Does that really make anyone else think?

There isn't really a crisis in Canada.

Those names made me smile.

what domestic issues/problems/crises is Trump tied down with?

>Canada
>relevant

Also, le weed man is too busy securing the rights of demisexual transgender Muslim presenting otherkins to do anything relevant on the international stage.

The insurgency.

>more than half the country does not want him to be President
>2 days in, already facing a massive protest campaign
>extremely hostile media

Gonna be all he can do to keep the trains running m8.

>Bibi
>not tied down by major domestic/near-domestic issues/problems/crises

topkek

Israel isn't large or relevant you retard.

>killing Palestinians and dicking about in Syria for his own amusement
>tied down

This goy--er, guy--is right, Israel is just a helpless little enclave surrounded by big, bad Muslims!

Bibi is a few weeks from getting prosecuted by the police on charges of accepting bribes.

>more than half the country does not want him to be President
How'd he become president then smarty pants?

>What is the Electoral College?

>Papua New Guinea
Fucking dumb cannibals.

>what is Republican controlled congress and executive
Not sure what you're talking about. The media haven't had much effect on Trump so far.

Add US to the list.

>a country with electoral colleges
>that prides itself on freedom and democracy
>calling someone dumb
>for understanding how democracy works

Wow lad

>knowing what the fucking electoral college is means it was my fucking idea

A

>media haven't had much effect on Trump so far

>spends more time tweeting about media criticism than doing anything else

If that were true, the Democrats wouldn't be utterly destroyed now. They haven't been this weak since the 1920s.

Everything I said is true, though...

>controlling Congress and the White House means you'll be able to govern without opposition
>for a President who most voters literally did not want
wew lad, need to dust off those history books

>you in charge of reading comprehension

Democrat leftism has been utterly rejected by the voters. The Democrats have lost more and more seats every election since 2010 and are now at their weakest strength since 1928. So I would very much say that the GOP and Trump were wanted and voted for by most of the American people.

that is interesting

>you in charge of reading comprehension
Care to point out what I supposedly missed?

>Democrat leftism has been utterly rejected by the voters.
How do you interpret a Democratic candidate getting the most votes for President as a "rejection?"

>The Democrats have lost more and more seats every election since 2010 and are now at their weakest strength since 1928.
They actually received more votes for both houses in 2012 and more votes for the Senate last year. Also, opposition entails much, much more than just federal election results.

>So I would very much say that the GOP and Trump were wanted and voted for by most of the American people.
How was Trump "wanted and voted for by most of the American people" when Hillary got more votes than he did?