You have 10 second to justifiably name a better system of government

You have 10 second to justifiably name a better system of government.
>protip: you can't

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/wjWBXbGVyQU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

nationalist socialist

Absolute monarchy

seba basta fare dei thread

Mainlander Chinese Non-Communist Soviet-Like Government.
You can claim you're a commie while you're not and get your ass rich while seeing others suffer.
Checkm8

Nice justification faggots

Democracy - proper say of the people

"haha what communism is responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths the last century? no no it just hasnt been implemented correctly yet lol"

communist is a great system, if you are a fucking ant with no sentience. it all breaks down when you introduce the idea of self and self preservation.

Mussolini's fascist Italy

Neo-Marxist Totalinarianism

"Democracy is the dictatorship of the majority."

-Socrates

Take a lesson on world views you 13 year old pleb new fucking faggot.

kys

A REPUBLIC

Variations on a theme really.

America #1,

That was never communism. That was dictatorships under the 'communist' banner. A communist system sees the eventual abolition of a government and currency as the world will be equally free and prosperous, without the need of a government. It is a great system that has never existed to this day.

/thread

Nothing beats full communism. I am a proud member of the communist party in my country.

This is true.

I've always been a firm believer of techocracy.

Anarchism

Hungarism :^>

top fucking kek,

You guys are a joke. A load of hipster cunts who hold iphones and wear urban outfitters, trying to sound hip with your psuedo-science punch lines on global warming and being vegan. best part is your all in arts and the smartest one out of you guys goes in managment...

Proud member of mine too. Luckily the support is still strong for communism in many countries. It's certainly not dead yet.

meritocracy
I've won.

yuo mean capitalism ...

and if so you failed miserably

You're confusing us with liberals my newfriend. All we desire is a peaceful, stressless society.

that's because all attempts at communism always end up in non-commie dictatorships. what makes you think that your attempt would end up any different?

i heard that that was shoe0nhead in that picture, am i correct?

i really hope so

Anarchistic Capitalism.

No need to force anyone to do nuffing.

please tell me all about the communist manifesto and das kapital.

tell me also about how beautifully unrealistic it is.

tell me how you would love to work your hardest just so uncle marx can say that you worked hard, harder, or the hardest...

have you fucking read his book {more like friedrich engles book} its a fucking joke.

i cant belive you can even think its possible.

unless we all turn into robots

who the fuck is that ?

I always thought libertarianism was the best form of government, but after being wrongfully imprisoned i decided whilst sharing my food with the other prisoners, (because the cops would throw away your food and not allow sharing) communism has its strong points

you are liberals...

the idea of SJW's is absolute communism.

the idea we are all the same ,black, white, asian,arab, female, male... is communism and absolute nonsense.

the idea of no genders is communism
the idea that you dont even have your own fucking wife...

you are fucking cucks absolutely disgusting,,, you even try to demolish cultures and histories....

Kids sorting their problems in the playground.

Benevolent Dictatorship.

With me as Dictator!

Feudalism..
Communism is literally capitalism 3.0; even Marx admits this. Feudalism has existed for hundreds of years prior. It's the optimum system of government, because it runs on loyalty rather than legality, fiefs rather than laws.

Democracy. It actually works.

Libertarian capitalism
-government has no say in the personal buisness decissions of individuals (e.g. no minimum wage=more jobs
-justice system and emergency services are impartial, and help all the same, but individuals can hire private, superior companies too.
-no public health or education, people NEED a job, they cant be dependent of the government, which would then be dependent of the rich
i can go on, but now you justify how yours isnt politician tyrany garbage. I happen to like freedom
Yeah... nice dream, but an small amount of non-intrusive government IS required.

Its always funny when you warch old coldwar propaganda videos.

They show that communism will make the people poor and take away theit property and make them basically to slaves.

And now the twist. That is all happening under capitalism right now.

In jugoslavija for example (we arr from there) my father told me one time communists say that in capitalism you will habe to pay for your medicine and medication. And the people wouldnt believe them because to them this was so absurd(they lived in socialism and had perfect care of.) If you got sick and needed a doctor, you got paid the drive to the doctor/hospital and a second person to go with you got also paid fir a whole day. You could go at 3 oclock in the morning to a dentist and get treated, and not a singe cent was to pay.

You could sleep overnight directly at the street and noone would care, when i see how homeless get threated in the great and perfect usa...... damn if you give a person in need somethung to eat, you broke the law.

Communism is not perfect, nothing is.
But i do not honestly think that we are living in the better system.

The manifesto is fucking terrifying, one of the things it first makes clear is the first generations have to be indoctrinated (which by the way has already started in the west).

It didn't last week, when we allowed your mom to choose who'd fuck her first. She just wanted the niggers, all the other fellas got really mad and it was a fucking war.
When we arrive silently, don't even say hi and just start pounding her in the ass, things go so much smoother.

the human factor will always ruin all ideologies

read this and see how stupid you are

fucking libertarians are so fucking stupid.

no one's going to read you shitty copypaste internet essay retard, create your own arguments

This

The US is far from capitalist. Its real capitalist era were the 20s and 50s (Coolidge was great). But the US has spent decades now turning into a pseudo socialist-capitalist abortion. Minimum wage, 1.7 trillion annualy to healthcare and social security, state run discrimination... that ISN'T capitalism. Its the welfare state the is going to destroy the west.

I read it and it's better than your libertarian trashy system. It will never fucking work. You think society will progress with no education?

Just because you're unemployed and contribute nothing to society.

Roman Republic

mfw you got rekt and your whole life philosophy just crashed and burned infront of your eyes bcs of a "shitty copypaste internet essay"
>mfw i have no face

top fucking kek libertarians a whole other lvl of stupid.

youtu.be/wjWBXbGVyQU she's amazing

Ok, ive read it andit parodies capitalism and libertarians, it twists reality to make it easier for you to debunk, because you cannot debunk it by itself, meanwhile ive already debunked communism and the welfare state. When you arein the right, it is easier to debunk your foes, since they are in the wrong.

This, because it's not communism.

ONE OF THE FIRST STEPS MARX WROTE WAS A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP.
Do you retards even read or know about what you economic iliterates are supporting?!?!

We beat you National Socialist fags 71 years ago. Good luck.

no, she's libertarian

its not parody homie... its how your system would actually work...

your laisez faire,,, invisible hand,,, any pay is fair pay according to the markets offering....

is as stupid and ludicrous as the communist system... anything at the end of the spectrum is retarded.... and you are at one end.

kys and start reading on republics , socialism , and rational nationalism.

thats fascist you cunt kys

nationalism isnt the same as fascism... fucking nazi scum shit.

>no, she's libertarian
i meant that it was shoe parodying the subject of the picture,

you cant be serious

Right wing authoritarian fascism. The weak shoukd fear the strong

Look up hitlers political party

Civil anarchy

>parody with no basis in reality
>its how your system would actually work

*Weather.
>[National Socialism] is fascist you cunt kys
>nationalism isnt the same as fascism... fucking nazi scum shit.
pick one.

And it never will. Communism relies on everyone pulling their weight and not slacking off. But in reality anyone that knows they can get paid for doing nothing will do nothing. It's good in theory but will never be achieved in real life.

Utilitarian Technocratic Meritocratic Confederation with a personal-level Libertarian twist

Because the leaders are picked based on skill and direction instead of by idiots, and the people are not bothered by bullshit, because Bureaucracy would hardly exist in such a government. Also, political-correctness would be almost non-existent.
And anyone who wants to leave can do so, because the government doesn't really fucking care.

national socialism

I disagree: Having everyone armed takes away the need for the 2 things government control:

1) Defense

2) Negative consequences for not fulfilling contracts and social norms.

A democratic election system where the more intelligent members of the population get a larger say in the election. For example, votes are discarded if there is poor justification as it is a waste of a number.

No society could properly benefit where a 76 IQ John who smokes weed and works minimum wage at McDonalds has the same say as a highly sophisticated, well-educated, smart thinking, well contributing 156 IQ man. This is why equity is flawed and will never properly works (communism and democracy)

Smarter and more beneficial members of the population would also receive priority access to welfare, benefits, healthcare, and services (both from the government and private corporations through laws).

This form of balanced social hierarchy would definitely work. It will never happen though as unproductive members (like the examples 'John') have too much of an influence in modern culture (through means of existing governments and social media) and the fact that they would be too hard to remove from the say of the population (considering they are the majority of the population).

And how do you plan on fixing problem of the inevitable elite few that would constantly be elected under a Utilitarian Technocratic society with a libertarian twist?
This would imbalance policies to focus on the richest few rather than focusing on the well-being of the people.

Any

Justification: Communism isn't a government type, it's an ideology by deffinition, and any government type is better than no government.

Checkmate.

Communism never existed in practise. That's not what he is referring to. He's obviously talking about the Marxist-Leninist system.

Checkmate.

Marxist Leninism is also an ideology.
If you mean government based on the United Soviet Socialist Republics, that government type is called a Republic. It's in the fucking name you div.

By United Soviet Socialist Republics I obviously mean Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

A democratic election system where only Home-owners and the Military can Vote.

If you don't have an investment in the State, you shouldn't be able to vote.

A Democratic Republic where only Home-owners and the Military can Vote.

If you don't have an investment in the State, you shouldn't be able to vote.

Also Republics have a way of protecting the individual from the mob...

Do you own your home if you haven't payed for the bank for the loan you took out to buy it yet?

Ancient Greek Polis Republic

People from the city just gathered around all together and everyone decided directly what they want, not through politicians. Women had no vote rights but who cares?

>A democratic election system where only Home-owners and the Military can Vote.
>If you don't have an investment in the State, you shouldn't be able to vote.

Chinese are money shuffling into american real estate, upping the cost of land in places on the west coast and are making shit cash, paying the govt very little (

>dont go to the extremes
>offers socialism and national socialism
you are a funny one
But seriously, i'm not extremist, im close to libertarian extreme, but i do not believe anarchist capitalims works, just like fascism, comunism and whatever fairyland liberals whant

As in, they're paid peanuts (

Can they get over here to vote?

Just reject the Visa application, and they'd be unable to influence it.

>Women had no vote rights but who cares?
Women care.

This site is 18+ faggot.

fpbp

Who asked them?

Other women and cucks

I personally disagre, since while true thaat an armed public could act as a first level of internal defence, an organiced, better equiped and trained police department should be the bottom line, whith some hireable security companies acting a copycat police. Also the government is required to act as defence from external threaghts, even if it hires PMCs.

And secondly armed citicents have to take it seriously, laws still aply to them, maybe no in the same way as the police, but they can't go trigger happy, the same even more so to private security (due to the need for a positive public apearance).

hahahahahahahahahahahahah
>not MY communism
Every fucking time.

>Chinese are money shuffling into american real estate, upping the cost of land in places on the west coast

So, Are they in town come vote day?

You would for intents and purpose

Then banks decide who can vote, and this would be a good system you think?

capitalism you stupid fuck because it goes along with human nature and channels the inherent greed which humans have for good from which everyone can benefit. Also, in a capitalist system, if I don't provide you with something, I starve. How is that not fucking fair?

No they just suck nigger dicks, smoke weed all day, throw rocks at random people and wear hammer and sickle patches because they're cool '''''''''''''''''''''''actavists'''''''''''''''''''''''' and the ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''workers'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''party even though none of them ever had a fucking job their life, just like their fat rich jewish messias marx.

I personally think that the best system would be one in which everyone votes, but the worth of your votes is decided by an exam youhave tofulfill, that checks your impartial knowledge of economics, politics, and that you are aware of the policies of each party.

>So, Are they in town come vote day?
You'd be surprised at the loopholes people can find and exploit.

This, greed is human nature, a system that incorporates human nature is a system that works
merchantilism=>capitalism=>libertarian capitalism

>Also the government is required to act as defence from external threaghts, even if it hires PMCs

Citation needed.

>And secondly armed citicents have to take it seriously, laws still aply to them, maybe no in the same way as the police, but they can't go trigger happy, the same even more so to private security (due to the need for a positive public apearance).

Do you know what happened to social deviants/misfits/anti-social retards? They got ostracised!

A scumbag broke multiple contracts? Guess who can't buy and sell now? No-one will deal with someone that risky.

That's what I was thinking. It would be a great way to implement the system brought up by

If, as the state, the slits-for-eyes can find a loophole, then that's my fuck-up...

voluntary association of equals

inb4 how do you pay for roads and schools?
poverty and government are separate issues
the poor will always need assistance so long as they are poor
that doesn't depend on the method of government

school districts, fire districts and utility cooperatives can raise money and operate without central governments or coercion

Are you not interested in arguing what the best policies would be? I was giving an example as to specific cases in which your proposition wouldn't work.

which country?
how's it turning out there?

>citation needed
fuck user, i don't know WWII, japs declare war, attack Pearl Harbor, what do?
>(...) got ostracised
of course they did, they didn't comply with social norms, they dont need to if they dont want to, but they have to pay the price of being rejected. Its what SHOULD happen
>breaks contracts no one deals whith him
no problem whith that