Well that sucked

...

thankfully they dropped it in the absolute dead zone of the year where it'll be a distant memory come feb and forgotten by march

already forgotten

You expected anything different? This is the xx we're talking about. They have always been awful.

>posting the wrong cover

>donald trump says "wong"

I feel like I've seen this gimmick before, except it was well executed by a band that actually made original music.

Agreed. What a snoozefest

I don't know. Albums in Jan+Feb are the ones I remember the most.

You should have known this from the beginning, they have always sucked

I like it.

xx - 9/10
Coexist - 8.5/10
I See You - 8/10

agreed

I like it. It's rather uncomplicated, but quite pleasant.

Eh it's more
The XX - 8/10
Coexist - 5/10
This - 6/10

>what is an opinion

it's alright. anything else get released or is going to be released anytime soon?

>what is objective quality in music

...

I always thought they had the potential to make a classic album, but apart from the first four songs on their first album, the rest of their output is quite underwhelming. The Jamie xx album was decent, however.

eh its more

xx - 6/10

Coexist - 3/10

I See You - 4/10

nice. xiu xiu is great

>official judge of objective quality in music

Like it or not, they started the whole minimalistic dream pop/electronic wank of the 10's (stuff like London Grammar), so I'd say their sound is at least fairly unique. Jamie's production is on point as always. I'd rate it above In Colour and Coexist but under the s/t tbqh

anyone got a link?

Yeah, it did. I'm glad Sup Forums is being sensible.