Rest of the world, are you even trying?

Rest of the world, are you even trying?

Why is the Anglosphere so superior?

Other urls found in this thread:

medalspercapita.com/#medals-per-capita:all-time
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

wew Brits are literally using Murricans to lead a table
really makes me think

TSUUUUUUUUUUU

>having to rely on a country full of German, Irish and nigger diaspora to lead somewhere

Fuck off. We lead that medal count

If you didn't have such an appetite for genocide, those Germans would still be in Germany.

Cringe

Don't do this

At least it makes us fifth

Try using reddit and fuck off away from here

> he's actually serious

Cringe

>by country
>anglosphere

Brits can't even shitpost correctly.

BTW if you wanted to be a real country then just join USA as 51st state faggot.

So is america cool with that? Being shared number 1 with the UK?

Of course not.

They know deep down that their #1 spot is fraudulent, based on splish splashing in 31 different ways so sharing #1 is the right thing to do

Hitler had, the germans were just following orders.

...

Most medals are fraudulent because they were earned in women's events.

at least they only use their bodies to win medals user

If made up countries like Refugee Team and Belgium count, I think the Anglosphere does.

>so sharing #1 is the right thing to do
Interesting stance for the technical #2.

There's far more British diaspora in America than Irish, and rivalling or even surpassing the German one.

usa isn't anglo and thank g-d for that.

they evolved and call themselves american now.

>"What's your ancestry sir?"
>"My ancestry is american, now get off my property"

We aren't Anglo you bong

Hey man, that's rude!

CANZUK would have 32 golds, 35 silvers and 31 Bronzes.

>CANZUK

The only true Anglo union.

Post yfw you realized Finland has most medals per capita

medalspercapita.com/#medals-per-capita:all-time

>Finland
Who?

per capita is irrelevant

if monaco wins a medal it will make them the most successfull country in the olympics per capita, nobody would be impressed anyway.

per athleta

they won't though
Of course per capita matters. The higher the population, the higher the pool of athletes to choose from. If 1 in 10 million can become Olympic medal tier athlete then Finland has half an athlete while the US has over 32

We've got enough muslims and inbred quasi-nationalists to deal with without your niggers and spics.

Wow, never expected the brits to be so cucked by America.

I like you Britain

It's too simplistic to just say population is the key, you need a general sporting culture in a whole range of sports for it to matter to begin with, as well as a funding structure and general quality of living.