How could they have killed so many whites and not be lynched? Seriously it was a 5 plus bodycount per episode

How could they have killed so many whites and not be lynched? Seriously it was a 5 plus bodycount per episode.

Kunta even left like 5 dead bodies on the plantation's road and no one ever mentioned it.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hfIe9P13X8s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because it's fiction.

Wait, so root is now about killing whites?

Pretty much it's just revenge porn

You think they would want to show how blacks could killed lynched without any trial at all though.

Haven't you heard? White people are evil.

It's just not historically accurate.

A black would have been executed as soon as he killed just one white man regardless of his motives or if it was self defense

It just seemed to be against the oppressive tone they were trying to set up. How can you be oppressed if you can get away with murder?

>historically accurate
Those days are over, mate. These days it's 'historically pleasing to underprivileged races'.

They showed the part where africans sold eachother though. That was even left out of the original roots. If they really wanted to push an agenda they would've left that out

...

Jesus fucking christ moffat you fucking shitting hack

Holy fuck I thought this generation was totally anti-orwellian bullshit. Doesn't everyone like to brag that they read 1984 to seem intellectual?

>If they really wanted to push an agenda they would've left that out
Not necessarily, they just make whites extra evil to make up for it. Besides, even if they didn't intentionally vilify whites to compensate, no leftist is going away from watching it thinking, "Huh, maybe some Africans were to blame too." These people don't use logic, they just follow the narrative that whites are bad and POC are good because it feels cool to be sympathetic and progressive.

The thing is that lefties THINK they're being anti-establishment, they don't understand that it's the establishment who are forcing the agenda. They don't actually give a fuck about what they preach, they just want to be alternative and hip.

I just want one slave movie that says the powers that be are to blame. European rulers bought slaves to decrese overhead and african rulers sold people to make a quick buck.

Their were no dirty low class Irishmen that owned slaves. The lower white class probably were racists, sure, but only because the aristocracy pushed that agenda, that blacks were inferior.

Just one movie that says not all whites are to blame, please

The series "Versailles," airing right now on BBC, features King Louis XIV getting cucked by a black midget and even helping the Queen deliver the dwarf's baby.

There's another series from a few months ago where a medieval English queen was portrayed as a proud black woman herself.

British television is actually getting absurdly obsessed with black people even more than the US, which I can't figure out at all because doesn't Britain have waaayy more Arabs than blacks?

Too bad. Instead you're getting a 100th anniversary remake of The Birth of a Nation, now telling the story of Nat Turner, a freed slave who heroically killed every white person he could find

I don't believe you. They tried to say at one point england had a black queen? Who's buying that crap?

KILL ALL WHITE MEN

KILL ALL WHITE MEN

KILL ALL WHITE MEN

t. White girl on tumblr

>literally equating Nat Turner to the kkk
>bad thing

Presenting for your viewing pleasure, King Henry VI and Queen Margaret of Anjou in BBC's "The Hollow Crown"

TRIGGERED
R
I
G
G
E
R
E
DEREGGIN

That's a meme, tbqh. We don't actually have that many arabs, they're just ridiculously over-represented by the media because they complain so much. In truth, there are only perhaps five cities with large numbers of arabs, and even then they're all boxed into their own little shanty towns. Plenty of blacks, but we got the better deal as our slaves were mostly Caribbean, so the blacks that are here are mostly fairly respectable due to their hardcore religious upbringings by their first or second gen parents. Even then they're confined to large towns and cities. In most of Britain you'd be hard pressed to bump into someone who isn't white provided you stay away from London, Leicester etc.

The real niggers here are the youth, who've adopted the afro nigger culture that's been forced in American films, music videos etc. That isn't a shot at America, btw, it's a shot at your degenerate kike media -ours being no better, perhaps even worse.

To add to this, our media likes to project Brits as largely progressive leftists who love people of colour. In truth, the vast majority of Brits are oldschool racists. Those who aren't don't outright hate blacks, arabs etc but certainly wouldn't want one living next door to them. You get the odd few who go along with the progressiveness hype and the few who genuinely aren't bothered at all but for the most part people don't want them here.

youtube.com/watch?v=hfIe9P13X8s

WE

WUZ

CONQUERORS

N

SHIET

Hannibal was bretty cool tbqh

He wasn't black though.

>To add to this, our media likes to project Brits as largely progressive leftists who love people of colour.

Outside of lower class areas of northern England, this is pretty true. Scotland is also basically communist by this point and worships at the feet of Muslims.

English and Scottish hate Jews more than any other group, again because far-leftism is so anti-israel these days

Haley claimed that his sources for the origins of Kinte were oral family tradition and a man he found in the Gambia named Kebba Kanga Fofana, who claimed to be a griot with knowledge about the Kinte clan. He described them as a family in which the men were blacksmiths, descended from a marabout named Kairaba Kunta Kinte, originally from Mauritania. Haley quoted Fofana as telling him: "About the time the king's soldiers came, the eldest of these four sons, Kunta, went away from this village to chop wood and was never seen again."[4]

However, journalists and historians later discovered that Fofana was not a griot. In retelling the Kinte story, Fofana changed crucial details, including his father's name, his brothers' names, his age, and even omitted the year when he went missing. At one point, he even placed Kunta Kinte in a generation that was alive in the twentieth century. It was also discovered that elders and griots could not give reliable genealogical lineages before the mid-19th century, with the single exception of Kunta Kinte. It appears that Haley had told so many people about Kunta Kinte that he had created a case of circular reporting. Instead of independent confirmation of the Kunta Kinte story, he was actually hearing his own words repeated back to him.[5][6]

See also: Harold Courlander ยง Roots and the issue of plagiarism
After Haley's book became nationally famous, American author Harold Courlander noted that the section describing Kinte's life was apparently taken from Courlander's own novel The African. Haley at first dismissed the charge, but later issued a public statement affirming that Courlander's book had been the source, and Haley attributed the error to a mistake of one of his assistant researchers. Courlander sued Haley for breach of copyright, which Haley settled out of court. In a later interview with BBC Television, the trial judge stated, "Alex Haley perpetrated a hoax on the public."[7]

>tfw Roots is based on lies and plagarism

When do we get to a point where we can call this blackwashing?

They're basically appropriating and disenfranchising historical figures

>history channel made Hannibal black
lol

So, no Chicken George then?

At what point are Northern Africans call peoe on their bullshit.

I hate those pictures that say Egyptians were black. They weren't, in fact the Ptolemies were mostly greek.

Fuckers, there's nothing more disgusting to me than trying to rewrite history

Literally total bullshit.

>tfw you actually liked Roots
>tfw it was all bullshit

What?

didnt the lynchings often take place after trial though? I remember the last documented one in the USA definitely did (and the guy deserved it as well).

i doubt that outside this isolated social circle of politicians, celebrities and journalists that make up the western elite marxist ideas get much positive response.

I mean here in germany its statistically documented that journalists (no matter the employer) overwhelmingly vote green and socialist and those are 10% parties while the far right is moving towards 20% despite constant bashing by the aforementioned groups.

the public perception is very skewed

Well they would be their property. It would be like shooting a dog with rabies. They weren't considered citizens so they didn't get the right to a fair trial

>didn't the lynchings often take place after trial though?
No. A lack of a trial is what makes a lynching a lynching. You're thinking of a regular hanging.