Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?

Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Imthgqqua0I
youtube.com/watch?v=simxjM1l4VE
slashfilm.com/ghostbusters-reboot-trailer-confusion/
youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0YexsRCPc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because you'd be sexist otherwise

Because if you don't you're a friendless loser instrument of the patriarchy. Even the original Ghostbusters said this film is better, none of them were threatened or bribed even. So go see it or you hate women.

Because it features the funniest women in today's Hollywood.

...

I'll watch it when there's a torrent where all of leslie jones dialog has been replaced with chimp noises, shouldn't take long

Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?

Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?

i dont get it

Because its a completely different movie with a different monster

There's literally no reason.

The chicks who really the comedy, may take crack at each other by any means ... (笑´・艸・)

youtube.com/watch?v=Imthgqqua0I

youtube.com/watch?v=simxjM1l4VE

Because they'll shoot you in the dick if you don't.

Completely putting the fact that this movie by itself looks dumb as hell

That's a really stupid question, isn't it? You could say that about any remake or sequel. That's not a criticism.

Because you can see McCarthy getting slapped.
Oh wait, you can see that already in the trailer.
Mhhh
Maybe so you can see how a black woman has to serve 3 white female scientist. Because blacks will never be scientists.

You're a misogynist if you don't.

>completely unnecessary remake to cash on nostalgia
>not criticism

stop shilling this crap

If you've seen the original then this new one is not made for you

Because it's a sequel, fucktard

>Because it's a sequel, fucktard

It's not though, the events of GB 1 and 2 didn't happen in this movie and the original cast aren't even playing their original characters.

slashfilm.com/ghostbusters-reboot-trailer-confusion/


>Speaking on The John, Jay & Rich Show (via The Guardian), McCarthy clarified what the movie is by calling it a reboot and not a remake (though sometimes the differences between the two aren’t clear in Hollywood) and then talked about her perspective on the trailer:

>I know it’s weird that they say [in the trailer] ‘30 years ago’, but in this movie it’s like the first one didn’t happen. It’s a great story but it’s told totally differently. It’s four unlikely heroes, it’s in New York City, ghosts are taking over; it’s that same classic story but it’s not 30 years later … it’s not dependent on the first one.

because shes not funny

Post one funny thing that any of the lead cast has ever said.

For cameos of all the surviving actors at the end.

I'm gonna go just to see the piss mist when they save the day for the helpless womyn.

>For cameos of all the surviving actors at the end.

>I'm gonna go just to see the piss mist when they save the day for the helpless womyn.

You will be very disappointed.

It should be fun enough to pirate and watch for free.

Also, there will be a porn parody which will be nice.

>Also, there will be a porn parody which will be nice.

There's a porn parody now with Gianna Michaels.

>Jimmy: "Why was this idea appealing to you?"

>Bill: "It was only cos I knew these girls were funny".

What did he mean by this?

youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0YexsRCPc
1:45 mins

What did she mean by this?

because they're ladies

there's no joke . people equate ghetto speak and loudness with comedy now

>I'm gonna go just to see

>people will flock to watch it just to see how bad it is
>it will be a box office success due to the publicity
>rottenshills will give it 98% as it always does
>SWJs will declare it a stunning success in your face patriarchy hahaha shitlords

can we stop the "I'm just going to watch it to see how bad it is" meme

Seeking male approval.

>Imagine being Bill Murrey
>Trying to get Ghost Busters 3 made
>Trying since 1989
>Declined every single year
>You eventually give up and fall back on horrible Z-tier comedy movies to make the wheels go round.
>Years later
>Some faggot director picks up a script and gender swaps it
>You get turbo-pissed at the fact that they're rebooting the movie without you, only providing you with a cameo opertunity
>Sony gets on your ass and sue you into compliance and forces you to promote the abomination of a movie they've funded
>Sit at some god-awful talkshow with your old buddies from GB and 4 harpie comedians who don't possess any talent apart from having a vagina
>Reminisce about the things that could have been and use your finely tuned acting chops you've been honing for years hoping for a GB sequel-only now you're using it to promote a movie you're not even starring in
>Suddenly remember that all this can be remedied by a shot of whiskey and a shotgun blast to the face
>Smile, act and laugh at their jokes.
Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes.

She knows the movie is shit.
Feig also miscast her completely. She's supposed to be the wacky one.

if you virtue signal hard enough a feminist might let you put your penis inside of zir

And it didn't kick off its promo campaign with

"THIRTY YEARS AGO . . ."

>She's supposed to be the wacky one.

her hysterical screaming in that diner scene was pretty wacky.

Whole movie is a mess, not one of them has any kind of personality, relatable or otherwise, it's like they just stand around waiting to say their lines than actually have conversations.

I always got the impression Murray was the one holding back any attempt at a sequel. I dont know whether he was waiting on the perfect script, had n interest in doing another Ghostbusters, or just being a cunt. In any case, Egon is dead and the window has closed.

That clip they showed on the talk show felt like it was intentionally chosen to showcase an utter lack of chemistry and timing.

Seriously, it feels to me like they weren't even in the same room together delivering those lines.

Yeah, if anything, it's Aykroyd who's hellbent on making a sequel.

>Imagine being Bill Murrey
>Trying to get Ghost Busters 3 made

But that was Aykroyd.

If he said anything negative about it, his legacy and good movies would become worthless and the last dying gasp of a long and varied carrer would go through a trail by media and would probably kill him.

>Mfw my goto halloween costume is Bill Murray Groundskeeper from Caddieshack.

because this is neo-Jewlywood's version of a troll if you liked the original.