New to soccer here, has anyone ever pointed out what a farcical concept penalty shoot-outs are?

new to soccer here, has anyone ever pointed out what a farcical concept penalty shoot-outs are?

seems ridiculous that you can decide the winner of a world cup by a meme lottery which is essentially a competely different sport

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/RRITqS6WEn0
youtube.com/watch?v=eqL7LIu7qEI
youtube.com/watch?v=t_dCOkETvu0
youtube.com/watch?v=osGXE2Aje5Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

please respond

>essentially a competely different sport
>it's about getting the ball inside the goal
Australia, everybody

It's the players own fault usually. They've been playing for 120 minutes and they're too defensive to do anything? The shootout becomes the only solution to tired players too scared to attack the goal.

>penalties are a lottery

I agree completely. They should keep playing replays until one team gives up like the good old days.

It's about mental strength
who wins the penalty shoot-out is which team wants it more

Anyway how would you suggest resolving a stalemate? golden goal until there's a winner?
fat chance you'd market that to tv channels

Until 1968, coin toss was used instead of penalty kicks

In the good old days, after several draws, the winner was decided by drawing lots.

This doesn't look so bad senpai
youtu.be/RRITqS6WEn0

Why don't they alter the rules. I fucking hate penalties. Most of us could score. Its that random. Why cant they do like after 120 minutes, unlimited substitutes. Those who have exited can now re-enter. 7 on 7 to open up the game. Something man, to have world cup or champions league end like that is annoying as fuck. Its like ending NBA on a free throw contest or NFL on a field goal contest.

just do it like hockey in the playoffs and have infinite overtimes until someone scores but each overtime remove 1 player from each side

the draws are fine during league matches, but for cup matches they should play until someone wins

Ice hockey has unlimited substitutions.

Niggas, have you played football? In no way penalties are random.
Being scored or not depends on the mental stability of the player, technique and reflex of the goalkeeper.
There is a reason why there are penalties designated players in the middle of the match and not just anyone goes up and scores

Then allow more subs during extra time

>calling penalties a lottery while posting a picture of England

>they wanted it more

Why the fuck are penalties called lottery
Pure skill and no luck.

If u can blast strong enough in corner GK can't do shit.

Different natures for different sports

>not understanding
There are allowed one less player on the ice. So instead of 5v5 it is 4v4

this was fun to watch, who knew mls wasn't completely useless

2 more subs during extra time would be objectively a positive change. Most of those are snoozefests with 2 teams barely able to run and too scared to attack.

Are soccer fans really this delusional?

Some epic penalty decisions:
youtube.com/watch?v=eqL7LIu7qEI
youtube.com/watch?v=t_dCOkETvu0
youtube.com/watch?v=osGXE2Aje5Q

It should be 10 shots and not just 5

i don't get the hate. they're hype as fuck. bone crushing pressure.

Do you think that teams will start signing penalty shot specialists?

Like it's just some Harlem Globetrotter type player who is subbed on in the last 5 minutes whose sole job is to shoot penalty shots?

>but each overtime remove 1 player from each side

I like this desu

>designated penalty kickers

yeah like Zaza.

No, wasting a sub to slightly increase your chances of hitting one penalty isn't a very good idea. You'd get better value out of the sub if you just introduced a good player before extra time.

Problem : at the 80th, I will just park the bus waiting for extra time.

Ferguson had a great idea : shoot the penalties BEFORE the extra time, the winner gets a half-point so we can't have a draw

Winner also gets bus parking benefit

At extra time, goals from outside the penalty box should count double. Would encourage teams to play on the 20-30 meters and be more spectacular as, if the players are more tired and run less, at least they will shoot more

I like penalty shootouts now that one freed
>us
from the guilt of the Huelocaust catastrophy.

that's just penalty shootouts more drawn out.It's still one vs one and all about mental strennght.
A better way would be set pieces. Because it tests the whole team's strenght.
A series of 5 free corners or free kicks per team, with 10 seconds at most per each action to score a goal.

just draw. every sport in the world should have draws if the score is tied at the end of regular time. if you aren't good enough to beat the other team then fuck you, get a job.

1 team parking the bus > both teams doing it

What did he mean by that?

Why doesn't anybody try to dribble past the goalkeeper?

>penalties are a lottery

so both teams win the world cup?

this is already the second shit thread an ausfag has made today

do australians even play sports?

>Away goals count in extra time

Now this is some shit that needs changing.

they might not be a lottery but they are certainly not indicative of who the best football team is

I wish it was golden goal until a team scores. Draw after 120? Just keep playing until one team eventually bangs one in or one team has to forfeit by having less than 7 players. No extra subs.

This is not fair, without penalties Portugal would not have won the Euro's.

You're saying its worse for a shit team who have miraculously held the draw with no shots on target, will continue to park the bus all game until the 90. Meanwhile the current scenario allows them to have 0 shots on target for 120.

just get rid of extra time

that's the benefit of winning the fucking shoot-out
the other team would be forced to attack aka a good match to watch

>new
Stopped reading right there

nobody wins the world cup.

The better team should have won in regular Times if they were so good

Amateur Hu3 goalkeeper here.

Denying a goal by defending a penalty kick is the ultimate glory.

0 0 games should give 0 pts