Why didn't they ever make a terminator movie where the main villain was a T-600...

Why didn't they ever make a terminator movie where the main villain was a T-600? Y'know the kind with cheap rubbery skin.

Cos I mean after the T-1000 they were constantly trying to amp it up.

>Oh yeah this is the T-X it has liquid metal and a metal skeleton for some reason that means it's more advanced than the T-1000

>*hits bong* Ok guys what if John Connor was a terminator all along? And he's like a super advanced one with nano machines and shit

I mean yeah a T-600 is less advanced than the main terminator, but that could be to the movie's advantage. He'd be bigger and stronger with built in weapons and shit, and he'd look creepy as fuck from the get go instead of needing to peel half his face off. Plus looking like a creepy mother would mean he could only come out at night.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gDQtrSKGOUU
youtube.com/watch?v=RTq74Ae94T4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

That's a pretty great idea actually

>he'd be bigger and stronger
Except he wouldn't be

that aside, T600kino when?

>main villain
stopped reading here because you're obviously a dumb-shit summer-fag.
the word you're looking for is "antagonist" by the way

>Except he wouldn't be

T-600 on the left

Sorry but Terminator is a blockbuster. It's not high cinema.

Fucking casual.

The organic she'll is needed for time travel, if he doesn't have that biological component, he won't be able to travel back.

Children know this.

Explain the T-1000 then?

They originally planned for him to arrive in a flesh cocoon to explain how he could travel back in time, so they could do the same for the T-600.

organic liquid or something

>what if John Connor was a terminator all along?
But he wasn't. He got turned into a terminator after he sent kyle back.

John being a terminator was the original idea for salvation.

antgonist and main villain mean the same thing in this context, why would you try to nitpick that?

>Sorry but Terminator is a blockbuster. It's not high cinema.

No. Terminator 2 was. The Terminator was not.

Other way around. The sequel is great but nowhere near as good as the original.

Man a movie about a metal skeleton from the future is hardly high cinema

This is now a James Cameron general thread.

youtube.com/watch?v=gDQtrSKGOUU

If it was directed by Stanley Kubrick you wouldn't be saying that.

Bigger then. but definitely not stronger

I watched the Abyss for the first time yesterday. Was pretty good.

I travelled to the past and googled this just for you, OP.

A short appearance shooting at someone is hardly what I meant.

I'm talking about an entire movie about one of these fuckers hunting someone.

that terminator was fucking terrifying, they need more like this

Because the whole point was that they were shit, and defeated relatively easily.

>why would you try to nitpick that?

They were shit at infiltration, not combat.

is this the /Fantomas/ general?

DEEPEST LORE

we would have, if they ever got around to make a terminator movie set in james cameron's future war:

youtube.com/watch?v=RTq74Ae94T4

but that's probably never gonna happen.

>*hits bong*

maximum adolf

wrong thread.

did you even read the OP?

Did you?

>>*hits bong* Ok guys what if John Connor was a terminator all along? And he's like a super advanced one with nano machines and shit
OK you hooked me faggot, still bumping my shitty thread though.

If you see a slow noisy tank wearing a Don Post mask, it's not getting anywhere near your base, and you can lob a grenade at it. End credits.

>(You)