If all the nations of the world united, which city should be the capital of Earth?
If all the nations of the world united, which city should be the capital of Earth?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
New York
Panama City
Belize City
None. The capital should be a container ship that's perpetually sailing around the world.
Montpelier, Vermont
New York or London
this
A new city built for the purpose of being the capital
That sounds like anime.
>Jew York
>the free state of the londoneer caliphate
Where?
>one is Jewish and the other one Muslim
really makes you think
beijing, world speaks chinese and all you nigs are now 99.999% chinese, tyvm come again.
LONDON
O
N
D
O
N
São Paulo.
paris or istanbul
there can be no other correct answers
...
A reconquered Jerusalem.
London
It's in the top 3 of most wealthy city's
It has the most historical influence over the world
It has a great deal of museums and is really only rivalled in cultural output by Paris
Of the 3 most important city's (Tokyo, New York and London) it is A the smallest (Tokeyo is the size of Netherlands and new York is 3 times as large) B is the most white (Newyork is 53% black London is 49% white) C is the 2nd most safe
In whole I think Tokyo shouldn't count as it's the size of fucking Netherlands and new York is a nigger infested shithole
>inb4 mudslime mayor
he is agnostic
>inb4 full of muslims
Only in the suburbs that aren't really considers London
>inb4 no go areas
A myth and look at fucking New York for Christ sakes
>istanbul
Africa of course
There is land, resources, and relatively in the middle of everyone.
Buy a chunk of the Congo or some other Central African nation.
Ruma, Serbia.
neither are anywhere close to the centroid of humans
Oh yeah only triple a star city
London, obviously
The point where its furthest place has the smallest distance compared to other points furthest places or
It'd probably be more realistic to have a capital for each continent
New York
Buenos Aires or Rio
London or Paris
Pretoria or Nairobi or Cairo
Tokyo or Hong Kong or Shanghai
Sydney
>Rio
Why?
Air travel makes this unnecessary. It's quicker to fly from New York to London than it is to travel by land from New York to San Francisco.
Why have a capital for both north and South America?
Just make it Havana or Panama City, fuck Americans
Dhaka has the best location.
Too bad its a shithole, full of brown ppl.
Because fuck you, that's why, lol.
New York, London, or Hong Kong.
You do realize that only Spain, ex-Spanish colonies, France, and ex-French colonies adhere to the retarded "America is one continent" system, right? Literally everyone else recognizes North America and South America as separate.
Even us latinos who live in the US do it.
Seems like a waste is what I'm saying
Much easier to have one for everyone.
It can be Belize if you want it to be with the anglos so much. It's as shitty as Lelgium so it fits
No U!
If we're going to have a capital for the whole world, it should be London or NYC. Not fucking Havana.
If we're going to have a capital for both North and South America, then it should be Miami.
Lel, fucking cubans I swear.
Thing with a capital is, you want some place without too much political power on its own and not very populated, just as the EU did with Belgium and it wasn't perfect.
Look at your D.C. it isn't your most populated city nor wealthiest, and it doesn't decide much.
You want someplace quiet.
Brazil has Brasilia, Spanish crown built Madrid for that reason.
Sealand
one that is multicultural enough so that its ethnic composition would at least attempt to reflect the world population in a sense
my guess would be brussels, london or paris due to their centrality
also having a singular capital of the world is fucking retarded
Bangalore, India.
>Of the 3 most important city's (Tokyo, New York and London)
The three most relevant cities are New York, London, and Paris. And Paris beats London in every category you listed.
Palmerston North
Germania
none. even if all nations became one,regional governemts would still be necessary. so most/all capitals would remain as regional capitals as there is no benefit to have a "capital of the world"
The centre of the land hemisphere.
whats the tower of babel
>brussels
>multicultured
have you ever even been to brussels, friend? its just another european caliphate in the making nowadays.
It depends what you want the symbolism to be.
It could be an irrelevant city or an entirely new city built from scratch so as to be neutral and not offend anyone. But that would risk projecting artificiality and soullessness and detachment from any roots. Of course otherwise it means we have to make a choice on what this world should be like.
If we want this united world to have a distinctly Western character for example, then it should be a city that has been central to Western history, while still remaining reasonably relevant today. There's a rather obvious choice in that case.
Paris obviously. Star Trek had the right idea.
Sydney、です。
Really?
Didn't know that I guess Paris having a 2 star rating makes them better
Paris having a larger nonehite population is better and higher crime rates along with France being famous for it colonial influence and pride
Thanks french bro truly insightful
You fucking retard
Earth's Capital should be on a terra-formed Moon
>If we want this united world to have a distinctly Western character for example, then it should be a city that has been central to Western history
Mecca?
More like Mars.
Musk, 2220.
it is multi-cultured, yes
Too far away
There's a reason they chose Brussels for the EU.
No one cares enough about Belgium to have an opinion about them. It was the perfect neutral ground.
What the fuck is a 2 star rating, is this Yelp or some shit?
Paris is smaller than London, has a much smaller non-white population that London, and is historically immensely more significant than London.
It's also not literally ruled by Muslims.
a monument in judeo-christian mythology
man became too proud in itself and claimed they could make a tower to the heavens, so god banished them to different regions of the world and removed the common tongue the people had spoken
Just like no one cares about the EU, a perfect symbol indeed.
Not with faster than light shitposting.
i wonder if some autists really did try to build a big tower "to heaven" back then
Speak for yourself faggot, america is one large landmass. We wouldn't be having this discussion if panama got their shit together and expanded into the ocean
............i really thing those numbers are outdated
the study's results were received from november 2016, apparently
world capital germania
Bitch please, it's all the same. The entire American continent has about as much diversity and historical relevance as one province of a West European country.
...
>western european """diversity"""
Singapore would be better since its legitimately dive4rse and multicultural rather than a mess of impoverished wogs
plus it has connections with both the west and east making it a perfect location.
imagine Paris full of homeless Bajoran refugees and Klingon immigrants
>If all the nations of the world united, which city should be the capital of Earth?
Slap it somewhere in the middle of the Sahara desert.
>close to the center of the planet's land mass
>will give us a reason to terraform the desert
/thread
Rome
lad...
also i fucked up i meant Alpha ++
paris has not got a government recorded demographic due to law but from private records from both NGOs and data from house renting the french nonwhite population is very large
>historically immensely more significant than London.
nice bate lov
Lagos
Every single ranking of world city relevance has the same top four in the same order:
1. New York
2. London
3. Paris
4. Tokyo
That said the only area where London beats Paris is cultural influence, mostly due to the linguistic advantage of being able to ride on America's coattails.
While there aren't exact numbers for race, there are for religion and London has a clearly higher Muslim population than Paris. It also has a literal Muslim mayor who uses Muslim phrases in Arabic during rallies. And I won't even get into the Shariah zones and Islamic courts of law, but that's an all round British problem.
Finally while London and Paris are of comparable importance today, London isn't even in the same league as Paris historically. Paris was the capital of Western Europe for over a thousand years combined while London was an utterly irrelevant backwater. London only managed to equal Paris about 200 years ago.
nice b8 m8
Why not just build a city?
Take empty land in africa, build a circle country with a capital, and build a huge nature reserve around it with walls to prevent too much immigration/protect the leaders.
Paris
Cairo, Egypt
NEW YORK NEW YORK 42ND STREET
Louisville , Kentucky
>Africa
or a space station in perpetual orbit
They already chose New York
Vienna
Brussels, Belgium
Istanbul
there is no better plae in the world
belgium is a non country
their capital is 25% muslim
Reykjavik
a useless shithole
The world would be a better place if you died
I do not think so.
I do
This
fucking brit
A giant space station that can be accessed through several space elevators all across the world at different places on earth. Or the geographic location near the oldest human fossil.
and why?
why not of all landmasses on the planet
would be somewhere in anatolia
or better
istanbul
no
istanbul is better