When will a ww2 movie actively reflect this

When will a ww2 movie actively reflect this

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/
youtube.com/watch?v=HON-9Z1Greo
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Lend_Lease
youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBupAeo4
youtube.com/watch?v=PVmYFJGoZ-0
youtube.com/watch?v=E8raDPASvq0
youtube.com/watch?v=LQdDnbXXn20
youtube.com/watch?v=xBXoXB3QvyI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Never

idk man. probably cry baby jews shilling holocaust.

if the subject of movies was based on body count they would mostly take place in china and feature a lot of famines

>All those millions of Russian peasants dead

Oh well. Should have embraced capitalism, eh commies?

Just because they literally forced men to march to their deaths doesn't mean they "contributed more" to WW2 like people always shitpost.

When will the scoundrel mods not delete this post?
youtube.com/ watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g

Finally someone agrees with what I have been saying forever. The Soviets suffocated the Eastern Front with disposable serfs... nothing more. The statistics don't lie.

Look at the German body count you dinguses.

Hollywood will never sympathise with communists, they'd sooner make films bullshitting about the evils of USSR than make one about their heroism against fascism.

The soviets were better equipped than the Germans you dummy.

Contrary to your 'conventional wisdom' you got from playing Call of Duty 2 back in 2006, the Soviets were more mechanized than their German counterparts who relied much more on horses for transportation.

>USSR
>their heroism against fascism.
kys my man

>muh jew spook

bump

>muh gitler spook

Are there any films that focus on the Battle of Stalingrad?

When will a movie be made about the good guys?

Stalingrad
Enemy at the Gates
some shitty soviet movies

...

there's several, use google you dumb nigger

>America won the war for everyone
>America has the best and largest film industry
>The entire world watches our movies

To the victor goes the spoils. We can say it however we like. Go back to your shanty village vlad

Why should America cater to euros? Why don't they just make their own movies about it instead of acting like whiney little bitches?

>Soviet Union
>Allies
pick one

youtube.com/watch?v=HON-9Z1Greo

Thread theme

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Lend_Lease

It was the fault of the Soviets that the Germans got all uppity in the first place. They don't deserve our praise. Individual soldiers on the ground might, but that goes for every soldier in every conflict.

>you now realize that D-day only happened because the allies realized that the Soviets were about to roll over Germany

we were pretty happy to chill and not fight, until high command realized that the soviets would take everything east of england within a year

This. Who gives a shit about the truth, our media movie propaganda literally can rewrite history for 70 years and we can be the only victor of WW2.

Is that why the US heavily supplied the USSR previously? Germany came to said conclusion much earlier desu.

>countries make movies from their own perspectives
Who knew?

Britbongs are so fucking delusional, and I say that as an anglo who shares a queen with them

>what is the Pacific Theatre

Funny how yuros always forget about this.

US and british policy was to let the soviets and germany exhaust one another; they only intervened when it looked at though one side would break-through; lend lease began when germany looked like it was going to win, D-day happened when the Soviets were about to win

the rest of the time was bullshitting stalin about a western front that was apparently about to open for about 4 years (lel)

The opening pic is specifically about Europe.
And while we appreciate the help, how about you stop stealing credit for Australian battles? You guys did win the majority of battles in the pacific yourself, why do you need to take credit for the few we did ourselves?

>UK that large
Yup, sounds about right
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

most of the world considers WWII over with the fall of Berlin, and the whole war against Japan as a separate conflict.
But I guess America was mostly responsible for defeating some starving 4'6" gooks with no industry so they make some movies to congratulate themselves

Nowhere as bad as USA's opinion of itself on that chart.

OP's post said "a ww2 movie," retard. World War 2 was called a world war because it took place outside of Europe as well.

britain should have accepted peace with hitler after france fell

but idiot churchill kept fighting for >muh honour and decimated the glorious empire as a result

>bolsheviks were the good guys

when will this meme end

>UKucks blown the fuck out as usual

No wonder they're currently getting beat up by and running away from Russian children in Marseille.

>Emus

What the hell man?

right, except the Allies fought in North Africa and Italy for years before D-Day. The Soviets hadn't even reclaimed all of their own country before the US and UK forced Italy to surrender

Dubs confirm
youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBupAeo4

If the US hadn't gotten involved Then the Axis powers would not have been defeated. That's why the US is considered to have been a major reason for victory.

>there were good guys

the whites were slave-masters and reds were bloodthirsty savages

my opinion is everyone contributed significantly (except france)

>When will a ww2 movie actively reflect this
>this
In the context for image boards, it is heavily implied that the OP is referring to the picture that was posted alongside the original post when stating "this" within this context.
>World War II military deaths in Europe by front/year (millions)
Therefore we can assume that OP wants a movie that reflects the level of causalities in Europe during WW2.
American education surely teaches you fucking reading comprehension.

You're ignorant. Japan was industrialized at that point in time.

EMU WAR WAS OUR 9/11 YOU SHIT CUNT STOP JOKING ABOUT IT IT'S NOT FUNNY

It didn't even have to come to this.

The chart's about contribution to victory. Russia is clearly the only logical choice, without them fighting the Axis would've won easily.

...

Hitler was a weeb who ensured that the Japs had the necessary equipment and funding.

what memes were available in this time?

Americans

you think he would have liked DBZ or that other anime show if he were alive today?

>except france
They had some motherfucking badasses fighting for them, though

youtube.com/watch?v=PVmYFJGoZ-0

>Reduced to approximately thirty able men, most members of the Sturmbataillon had been captured or escaped Berlin on their own, or in small groups. Most of those who made it to France were apprehended and sent to Allied prisons and camps. Fenet was sentenced to 20 years of forced labour, but was released from prison in 1959. Others were shot upon capture by the French authorities. General Philip Leclerc, the French divisional commander who had served under the Americans, was presented with a group of 11-12 captured Charlemagne Division men. The Free French General immediately asked them why they wore a German uniform, to which one of them replied by asking the General why he wore an American one (French Army uniform stocks had been plundered en masse by the Germans during the occupation). The group of French Waffen-SS men were later shot.

barely. The US was able to put together a bigger Pacific fleet in 3 years than the japs in 15 years of preparation. They had nearly no metal, oil, and rubber to fuel their industry because all of it came from recently conquered Dutch colonies. Fuck, incendiary bombs killed more Japanese civilians that the nukes because most of Tokyo was still wood and paper houses in 1945

Japan was industrialised in WWII the same way that India is today.

>World War 2 was called a world war because it took place outside of Europe as well.

with that logic WW1 isn't a World War

Not necessarily. The US could have deployed nukes if it came to that.

It's impossible to give "what ifs" though

The Russian Empire had been such utter shit for a century before the Revolution that the Bolsheviks ended up being an improvement

In all fairness WW1 took place in the Middle East as well, not to mention British colonies that assisted plus the U.S.

>USA causing more crimes against humanity during WW2

>we were pretty happy to chill and not fight

There was always an expectation for a front to be opened in France, it was just a matter of where and when. The Soviets wanted that front most of all, since t would force the Germans to divert forces off the Eastern Front. The Free French, of course, wanted to see France liberated, and would also stand to benefit the American & British forces working their way up Italy and having a tougher go of it than expected.

>ottoman empire
>middle east
>America

Those aren't in europe last time I checked. Europe might count as part of the middle east now though; I'm not sure

Yes, yes well done Germany

>HOWEVER

>hitler wuz a good boy, he dindu nuttin
>he didnt want war, dem allies FORCED it on him

its basically a completely separate war that occurred for completely unrelated reasons (US instituting an oil embargo on japan due to concerns over the expanding japanese empire)

japan and germany had zero interaction, they were just 'allies' for the sake of it

do you actually think that anyone will ever read that?

Literally two films called Stalingrad

>Turkey
>not Europe
>America
>implying there was an american front

If you call industrialization with bruteforce, while killing of any alleged dissenters by the millions, then sure.
youtube.com/watch?v=E8raDPASvq0

Japan was much closer to the West at the time than India is today. The GDP/capita was certainly lower than the US and UK, but not less than half, and was comparable to France and Germany.

>Turkey
>Europe

Spotted the german

shit, did an average german on the eastern front have a 2/1 kd?

and they even had better k/d on the western front too

damn, germans stronk

more like Russians expendable

it was all a lie to keep stalin fighting, churchill promised stalin new fronts for years, that never seemed to materialise

britain could have opened up a western front on its own had it wanted it had the numbers and navy, but ultimately nobody cared enough to take the risk for the russians and were pretty happy to let russians and germans kill one another

until it was obvious that russia was about to win, then we made a token effort to get on the victorious side

it's amazing what people can achieve without jewish influence

no

they encircled whole armies and then starved them to death in POW camps

And the Soviets still lost over 2x as many men as the Germans.

Heres one:
"One foreigner who did obtain a private audience with Mannerheim during the January lull was the well-connected Sir Walter Citrine...With unusual candow, at one point in their conversation, Mannerheim told Citrine that he himself had been incredulous about early Russian casualty reports. Battles simply were not that one-sided, in his experience. When one division commander reported that his men had killed 1,000 Russian infantry in a single night, at Taipale, Mannerheim let it be known that he did not believe the figure. Two days later, a terse message came back from the division commander, stating that more than 1,000 Moisin rifles had been collected from the dead and inventoried, if the Marshal would care to come count them for himself. Mannerheim allowed himself a wintry smile as he told the story, adding thathe seldom questioned the casualty reports thereater. "I did not think that my men we so good, or that the Russians could be so bad.""

A Frozen Hell, William Trotter.

even the Sup Forumstards that believe it don't read it
it's laughably bad, basically just a brute force search of any jew (or person who married a jew or was related to a jew) to have any part in Russian communist politics in the early 20th century. It includes Mensheviks even though they constantly fought and hated the Bolsheviks, and includes such stunning evidence as Stalin working at a refinery owned by the Roschilds for pennies an hour as proof that the Jews were funding communism

It's your standard "but this random person was a Jew, therefore conspiracy!" level of Sup Forums scholarship

>finland
>red

Legacy of Prussia

?? they still win then ya dingus
amen

Hmm 90% of all German divisions were in the Eastern Front
I wonder how well D day would have gone if they weren't facing young boys and other bottom of barrel conscripts?

Many of the Soviet military deaths were starved POWs.

The Nazis considered them subhuman and made a policy out of mass starvation.

hello JIDF! trying to cover up the links between judaism and communism again?

>paying your maid in silver

>You shall not only reproduce yourself, but produce something higher.

>cucked Yorop boys really believe that we single handedly defeated the nazis

Feel good to be american and worshiped. And lol at France 1945 and 1994.

Go back to worshiping your future German Fuhrer

you said 2/1 KD you kiddo

if your gonna think about ww2 like cod at least get your words right

Okay? The Russians had hordes of men that outnumbered Germans easily. Of course they needed the brute of their forces there to stop it. By no means does this mean the Soviets were a good contribution... ten million fucking men died on their side because the higher echelon of Soviet leaders wanted to spread communism. They could have simply kept the border secure and let the West clean up Germany or whatever but instead they sacrificed more lives than any other country for basically nothing. Fuck communists and fuck you for defending them.

>killing someone isnt the same as killing someone
t. you, a retard
will we ever be able to go back?

Nope that happened deliberately in Ike's death camps. Bolshevists practiced scorched earth tactics. Even the Wehrmacht didn't have enough. Stalin considered POW's as traitors anyway and sent them right after liberation to gulag.
youtube.com/watch?v=LQdDnbXXn20

>i am 16

this is the most retarded shit i've ever read i dont even

the german army isnt going to kill itself

If we do away with pic related then sure.

youtube.com/watch?v=xBXoXB3QvyI

>ten million fucking men died on their side because the higher echelon of Soviet leaders wanted to spread communism
you're a retard who doesn't know anything. Stalin was opposed to internationalism in 1939, that was a Trotskyite view and you'd be shot for it. Soviet policy was pretty inward-looking rather than the permanent worldwide revolution shit of the 1920's.
The reason the Soviets didn't "keep the border secure" was because Stalin was busy purging the army leadership and they were woefully unprepared for Barbarossa. By the end of 1941 an offensive war was necessary just to get back to their 1939 borders and at that Stalin wanted a buffer of Soviet-friendly states in eastern Europe so the same thing didn't happen
and honestly if it weren't for D-Day they probably would have kept going and made all of central and western Europe red as well