Are you autistic, Sup Forums?

Are you autistic, Sup Forums?

move circle so plane is inside circle.

go out and in 7 times. done

On 7th create wormhole that lets you escape the circle without passing through the edge. NEXT

But the plane still crosses it once when you move the circle over it.

keep plane on axis. Add levitation magnet, slowly move magnet around circle. can do it more than 7 times if you please.

That is like saying "it's not gay sex if you don't push back"

Does touching the tangent count?

Depending on the definition you use a circle has no edges.

Slice circle in half. Pass through edge of cut circle 7 times. Leave through open hole.

Where are the scissors?

I think you mean no corners. Of course it has an edge you fucking retard.

Is my autismo good enough?

Turn circle, not moving plane. Did I win?

it checks out

'edge of circle' followed by "inside THE circle"
suggests such fuckery is allowed

You missed the part about "depending on the definition", jackass. An "edge" is often defined in mathematical terms as a straight line segment. Circles have no straight line segments, therefore they have no edges.

what?

...

in that case it would have infinite edges of an infinitely small length

fag

and me

Congratulations you guys can think critically about a question, your not autistic.

am I stupid? I read these directions 3 times and cannot understand what is being asked.

That's 8 times, faggit

This actually makes the most sense since the number 7 exists if you just count the last 7 crosses. Doesnt say only 7, so why not 7 eventually, technically.

Then it wouldn't be a circle. It would be a polygon with an infinite number of sides.

I don't get it, it's not even challenging

That's an awful lot of certainty regarding mathematical theory that even the world's top intellects are unable to prove either way

Who's to say a circle isn't just a polygon with an infinite number of sides?

...

Let me try

what the fuck lmao

good job crossing the line 3 times and making a fucking mess doing it

you sure showed us

Kekd

...

Well, shit...

same, but i found out by looking and at the pics everyone is posting

Oh, I didn't miss it. I was correcting you. What you were referring to is a corner. Circles have no corners. But they do have an edge, much like yourself.

did i do good??

Just me, and anyone who agrees with me. I'm only giving my opinion. The topic has been long debated by mathematicians smarter than any of us, and even they can't agree to the answer.

>using english dictionary definitions on mathematical terms

wew lad

But wouldn't that mean that a poligon wiht infinite sides and angles would be equal to a poligon with a single side and a 2pi rad angle?

One day

Hive mind

So you agree that by saying "It woudn't be a circle" you're speaking on an emotional level rather than an intellectual one?

Whew, here i thought i was talking to someone who put some stock in what they said five minutes ago

What about this?

autists will think it's legit

YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

Forgot pic because autism.
Pls respond

you will always end up inside because the plane starts on the outside and you have to cross the edge an odd number of times. Might as well ask if you can do it by crossing the edge only once.

Good plan. I'm not sure how i even ended up in a thread on Sup Forums but this has been a solid reminder as to why i rarely come here anymore

>fly the plane across
>fly
well drive it into the circle first

...

>being this retarded

Surely bait, but I'll bite. An edge is not a line segment. I don't care what your preschool teacher told you, user. An edge is a border. Simple as that.

...

>when you get triggered by geometry

Someone do one with portal gun.

So an autistic person cant think critically about question?

thx

fly in and out 8 times...you did the 7 but it does not say you can not cross 8 times

>the edge of circle
didn't know circles have edges

i'm triggered by the person shouting Sup Forums memes at the people discussing geometry, but good attempt at following a quote chain, dunce

it refers to the word 'circle'

no autism here

Idiots

No, I'm saying that I am CHOOSING one of the three possible intellectual answers.

it has to be exactly 7 times or your mother dies in her sleep tonight

>unique post count didn't increase when you replied

Safe to say you're samefagging, thus proving your shit bait.

Crossing the edge 8 times means you also crossed the edge 7 times.

where does it state that?

eight. you fucking medical examinayonese

You sound like those fat retards that handout marxist pamphlets at my uni

By that definition a square has only one edge.

My name is Nikola Tesla and I'm an autist.
I do not think you understand what the word "autism" means.
Your little "test" is for retards, of which you are obviously one, and is no more than child's play to me.

...

see...8 times and your out, you flew through circle required 7 times and use the 8th to get back out, op never states you can not cross circle 8 times

GDHDHDKIDIKSNSHWKIWLODIXUIWNDNKDSOWOEJDNDJESOWODKJDOWURIDOXOQWJIDOEWKNDKDOEOWSSJJDOW kkdndjeowowkdmdjkeowwojd dkdkejekek sekieikeikekiekoekqpwpbdownjdowaneuosw sikesiejesbucpwmejifolwbxuoknekopdusnenododow

this op is the samefag that did a "autism test" yesterday and apparently didn't understand then that it was an ethics test (with the trolleys)
op is gay and clearly fucking dumb

Sperglord, after you crossed it 7 times you are INSIDE the circle, so you ended up INSIDE the circle. You fucking failed and your mom dies because of it.

nigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigganigga

No, it has 4 separate borders which are defined by their geometric position. Are you seriously this retarded?

That is like saying a line has 0 edges. Which technically would be true considering a 2 dimensional line could never exist and would actually be a thin cuboid, but then again a perfect circle could never exist meaning it has more than 1 edge so this entire argument is pointless (pun intended).

you created another circle, but didnt fly through the edge of it... it does not count

Circles don't have edges numbnuts

Circles don't exist, numbnuts.

Here is what I think. I do not believe there is an "infinite" number
of edges in a circle, by any common or logical definition of the word
"edge." An edge can be thought of as a boundary - in which case a
circle, being a single closed figure, does not have an infinite number
of boundaries.

However, does a square, having in a sense one continuous boundary,
therefore only have one edge? Certainly we do not wish the term "edge"
to be so imprecise as to fail to distinguish between a square and,
say, a pentagon. So, one might say that an edge is a continuous
straight line on the boundary of a closed figure. But the circle,
having no such lines, has *no* edges under this definition. This I
find somewhat unsatisfactory, but less so than "infinite."

More pleasing to my sense of the word, suppose an "edge" is an open,
nonempty subset of the boundary of a simple closed curve that is
continuously differentiable. Under this definition a circle has one
edge - the entire boundary. A semicircle would have two edges: the
curved portion, and the diameter.

This seems sensible because we wish to distinguish the circle and
semicircle by an important property - a semicircle can be said to have
two "vertices." Clearly we would like to say that a vertex is a
"point," no matter how blunt, so to speak. A regular 1000000-gon may
be close to a circle, but it is still not yet a circle. Precisely
speaking, a "vertex" is a point at which the boundary fails to be
differentiable. A smooth curve, or a straight line, does not have a
vertex.

But this last thought brings us back to the beginning. Think of a
regular polygon of n sides. As n gets larger and larger, this polygon
becomes more and more circular; that is, it gets closer and closer to
approximating a circle. One might say that as n approaches infinity,
we obtain a circle. And hence, it may be argued that a circle is a
regular polygon with infinitely many edges. Well, perhaps so. But
there are two reasons why this thinking is not satisfactory.

First, how long is an edge in such an infinite-sided polygon? It must
have zero length, and therefore is not a line but a point. So can we
truly call this zero-length segment an edge? The definition of "edge"
I gave does not permit an edge to be a single point - it must contain
more than one point.

Second, this limiting process, when applied to curves in general,
implies that any curved figure has an infinite number of edges - for
example, the semicircle would also have an infinite number of edges.
But for the reasons previously given, we would like to distinguish
between a circle and semicircle.

So, in short, it would seem that a circle has one "edge." But in fact
the definition that permits this to be so is not a commonly perceived
definition, as "edge" in common usage implies "straight line." Thus,
I feel that the matter is made more precise by simply not using the
word "edge" to describe a circle at all.

...

captcha: anzac A380

Agreed
Op: a dumb fag
The "test" is not a test. Just a monument to stupidity.

...

this is now a pilot of peace thread

By this logic you can't use the word circle, either. As a circle could never actually exist for 2 reasons
>infinitely small depth
>impossible to have no corners/edges
So if you're gonna be a pedantic niggerfaggot, then at least do it correctly.

...

...

test

that you think there is an answer other than it is impossible is amusing
the image presented in the 'test' (which it is not) makes it impossible
impossible is the only answer

>modifies the test question posed and makes up his own answer to a different question
>being this fucking dumb
the image is clear
"the" plane, referring to it, as presented and where presented makes the test (of stupidity that you believe there is a solution) very clear
impossible and btw, not an 'autism' test either as 100% of autists would spend 1 nanosecond arriving at the answer: impossible

...

>100% of autists would spend 1 nanosecond arriving at the answer: impossible
maybe that is the test

The true autism test is not replying to this retarded thread.

Again, that's not me, that's an ongoing debate amongst math scholars.

Is it autistic to use sarcasm?

Obviously, unless you can type 1,000 WPM, but you still brought it up.

This is like telling someone to cross the edge of the circle once and ending up outside of the circle. It's impossible.