If you like pop but claim this album is shit, you're a contrarian faggot

If you like pop but claim this album is shit, you're a contrarian faggot

>inb4 "you dont like what i like so youre wrong"

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ikl16iLeHIY
youtube.com/watch?v=NAh9oLs67Cw&t=737s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

but that album is pop and shit

why? i dont understand what can be so bad about it as to straight up rate it "shit"

Because it is shit

^ Sup Forums

>>inb4 "you dont like what i like so youre wrong"

You just deflected your own argument.

'this album is one of the most polarizing on the board, we should all understand this before making threads of this nature.


that being said, if you use words like "pop" and "shit" to summarize entire albums, you should stop posting altogether because everything you say is fucking worthless.

>albums virgins will never understand.

I have no idea what album this is.
why don't people put their names on album covers anymore?

aesthetic

its merzbow - pulse demon

>inb4
Anticipating an argument doesn't neutralize it

i dont like pop but that album is still great

I hate pop and like shit and I like this album

Thanks.

It's niether pop nor shit, but it is a masterpiece.

how am i supposed to trust your opinion when you don't use "but" correctly.

did you ever notice that the leaves in this album cover move when you look at it? pretty wild.

it's very annoying, honestly hard on the ears for a pop album. It's inferior to anco's best work & shouldn't really even be mentioned when discussing things they did successfully.

Pop is garbage, hcd pleaser for the taxes it brings in. You live in a box.

Animal Collective is legitimately one of the worst bands of all time.

This is what happens when a bunch of faux-artsy numales really want to be cool and different but are too dumb and uninteresting to do it any way possible and also think they're too good for anything that conveys any kind of emotion. Or is catchy. Or is written well. Or has anything redeeming.

Listening to this god-awful band is like having an 8th grader beat me over the head with a finger painting. It is so contrived it's agonizing. These guys so hard to be artsy it sounds like the members have veigns popping out of their forehead.

It goes out of its way to be different because it has no other ways to be interesting and the way it's different is just random bullshit. It's lame as fuck and them cranking that factor up to 11 doesn't change that.

I don't expect any kind of rebuttal because their fans are the worst kind of hipsters that act like babies when someone doesn't like what they like and think insulting someone is an argument.
The problem is that Animal Collective are a special kind of unlistenable; their albums don't reward active engagement, but they don't make good background music, either. Their brand of twee is cloying and grating like an attention-starved, sugar-crashing eight-year-old who wants you to admire his finger painting, while you're trying to wash the dishes

t. edgy middle schooler

???

youtube.com/watch?v=ikl16iLeHIY

tru

>faux artsy
>their brand of twee
Those phrases are almost as bad as "if you like pop" but otherwise it's true.

A lot of people on here are going to be roughly the same age as anco on about the same wavelength and that just doesn't go over well when it comes to having to eyewitness their transformative experience at you.

Can anyone honestly explain to me how garfield got popular? It's never been funny. How did this guy get his comic in the paper?

It started in the late 70s. You know how much drugs they were on.

>liking pop

>pop
>popular
>music for the people
>autistic

youtube.com/watch?v=NAh9oLs67Cw&t=737s

he wanted to make everyone in the world laugh at the same time :)