Lets see how retarded you fuckers are

Lets see how retarded you fuckers are

>will it take off?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)
youtube.com/watch?v=989FrJIzo0U
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

it won't, it need a airflow to take off

/thread

wrong, faggot

the wheels generate kinetic energy that powers the planes wing boosters

>immediately falls off back of treadmill
>critical mission failure
>Even if still upright will push against back of treadmill for eternity

How could anyone get this wrong?

fucking kekled

Yes it will, the aircraft propels itself by pushing the air backwards, not by driving really fast somehow. As if the wheels have anything at all to do with the plane taking off. Lol.

no. Ground speed does not create lift. If it was some sort of wind treadmill then yes.

Also fuck you for making me reply to this shit.

>it would hit the treadmill
>it's not a real plane

>implying an airplane doesn't require wings to fly

>the wheels generate kinetic energy that powers the planes wing boosters

totally plausible

what about now faggot?

fucking cancerous faggot kill yourself op

if the fan is strong enough it actually will

Kek

with a very strong fan it would, learn about lift

With the kinetic energy generated the entire treadmill would take off faggot, you need to restrict the airflow by pointing a fan at it from the top, therefore allowing the kinetic acceleration vector flow field to bend around space time thus elevating the wing tipped nose driven hover board.

you can
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)

no no no those are actually pretty funny

????

no the wings are in the way

Bernoulli says no

OP confirmed for not understanding middle school physics and mechanics

Didn't they test this on mythbusters a long time ago? Pretty sure it didn't work.

Due to the spinning of the music spin pad my sources say that it might in fact stay there.

depends on the direction of the spinning of the rotor and music disc

what is that a fucking griddle? go back to /c/ooking

Yes. Just more airflow. Enough to simulate movement.

OP, do you know this gets posted a lot?

It isn't clever.

The only guaranteed retard is OP.

Yes, if it spins fast enough

Just asking this questions shows you are retarded.

Wtf, it wont because the wings will smack against the sides of the treadmill

only if a terrorist is flying it

Yes it will. The jet engines will move the plane forward regardless.

No the wings will hit the treadmill supports.

If it were a normal runway that matched the forward speed of the plane but in reverse then it'd still take off because the wheels on a plane are NOT POWERED and are not required for forward momentum. They will just free spin while the engines move air backwards to create forward thrust and the plane will move forward and eventually take off.

The only way the plane would not take off is if the runway were moving fast enough backwards that the friction caused by the wheel bearings would be greater than or equal to the forward thrust provided by the engines. If that were the case the wheels would explode and the landing gear would shatter almost instantly dropping the plane down onto the runway.

Witnessed.

Can't disagree with the quads, let's just wait until a mod deletes the thread since there is nothing else to write.

sadly it will crash when it hits the treadmill

FUCKING GENIUS

Retard detected

Bernoulli is dead

If the engines are running, yeah likely. Their purpose is to create an air pressure differentiation, not just propel the plane forward.

It will go flying off the turntable long before it takes off, the vessel isn't balanced to spin.

woops i forgot that makes all of his contributions to math and physics irrelevent

>the wheels would explode
well thats false, with both the forward velocity of the plane and backward thrust somehow generated by the moving runway, it would be the same as if the plane were to go forward on a normal runway.

tl;dr

in both situation the wheels spin at the same speed

...

It will because air flow will be produced from the conveyor belt which is in the opposite direction of the plane. Because it's in the opposite direction the air will flow on the other side which will let the plane take off

The revolving of the turntable will transfer the ki energy throughout the helicopter causing it to float

>air flow will be produced from the conveyor belt
a very effective way to create an airflow isn't it, i use conveyor belts instead of fans

fans won't cause enough ki (or qi/chi) disturbance to let it take off because the fan only blows wind in one direction. An airplane needs air from multiple angles

...

...

just because air flows downwards doesnt mean it will take off. why do you think shadows start from behind the body but as you move shift up towards different sides? it is the same concept of shifting the chi throughout the body that shaolin monks use.

Of course not you dumb fuck. It will crash into the control panel first.

it will take off because the force isn't centered throughout gravity.

Clearly fucking not. The wings would hit the treadmill

>it is the same concept of shifting the chi throughout the body that shaolin monks use.
right...

You obviously didn't read the rest of the sentence. Wheel bearings are designed to be as close to frictionless as possible so i'm saying for the friction caused by the wheel bearings to counter the thrust generated by the engines (nearly 100,000 lbs) it'd have to be moving backwards at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour which would destroy the tyres and landing gear (and the force of the air generated by something moving that fast would probably destroy the plane too for that matter)

no

LoL. The plane is obviously smaller than the treadmill you dumbass

-Jason Blaha

No.

>The treadmill control panel risers are in the way.

It will take off because the treamill isn't heavy enough to make the plane fall off. I used to build hydrogen compressors I know what i'm talking about the centrifugal force of kinetic gravity can't be changed by a minor disturbance in the playing field

Either way, the pilots are gonna get sick....

It will take off. LoL at all the cucks not realizing that this is a trick question. It will take off backwards off of the trreadmill

If the pressure inside the plane exceeds the pressure required for fission into helium, plane will lift

Source: Politifact

witness my septs.....

Provided it could reach that specific model of aircraft's required rotational (the translational point of lift) velocity and the structure of the machine it is on did not interfere with laminar airflow over the wings then yes.

Damn, was worth a shot...

Wait what? the weight of the treadmill is inconsequential; it's all about the movement of the belt.
Unless you're taking the image at face value (which i wasn't) in which case check where those wings would hit and report back to me.

sure it can take off, just throw the treadmill with the plane on it off a roof at 700 miles per hour, it'll work itself out.

the helicopter won't fly because turn tables aren't real, we all know dj's use ipads and simply press play.

Many heavy lift cargo planes have propellers.
In front of the wings.
The airflow will provide more lift at lower speeds.
For relatively shorter takeoff.
So even some lift a zero groundspeed.
Not enough to take off, of course.

do you really think an airplane would not fucking blow through a treadmill at 700mph?

what if - the treadmill with the airplane on it are in a photo backdrop room, inside the cargo area of a flying plane? huh? can't prove velocity of an object with a picture.

what if the helicopter was on a turntable inside the cargo area of a plane. etc

maga

top kek

can you count?

It will hit WTC

With enough airflow over it's frame yes, but it's ground speed will still be 0 unless it's developing thrust as well once airborne

Depends how fresh the beats are

Yes it will take off in the plausible scenarios.

1. The treadmill is "loose" and can move freely
2. The treadmill is moving at some speed

3. The treadmill is moving fast enough to cancel out the acceleration caused by the jet engines


In scenarios 1 & 2 the plane takes off. The wheels are not powered on a plane, they simply allow it to move along the ground during takeoff and landing. The jet engines are unaffected by the treadmill and the wheels would simply spin faster as a result of the moving ground.

Scenario 3 is basically not possible. The speed required to cancel out the acceleration of the jet engines would completely obliterate the wheels of the plane. In this case the plane would not take off, but it's basically asking "what would happen if we took the acceleration of the jet engines and canceled them out?". Nothing would happen.

this, faggots who dont know what the dimensionless beat freshness coefficient is need to gtfo

>wheels would simply spin faster

Let's assume there is no friction on the wheels. The wheels exactly match the speed of the conveyor.
> Engines spool up, start to produce thrust.
> Aircraft attempts to accelerate
> Conveyor accelerates in opposite direction
> But wheels are frictionless and just spin faster
> Feedback mechanism, wheel velocity quickly reaches infinity
> Infinite mass
> Plane collapses
>If you do not reply to this post this your mother will die in her sleep tonight.

it might move upward a bit, but it will be blown backward because it has no forward thrust. Even if the treadmill moves in reverse and the wheels locked, it will have no forward force once their is no contact.

the actual paradox is that the treadmill hypothetically matches the speed of the wheels. but because of physics the wheels will always be spinning twice as fast, so the speed of the wheels and treadmill will increase to infinity causing the paradox. The plane would probably take off, tho, because the engines pull it forward. All the wheels do is roll like your mother after thanksgiving

I laughed entirely too hard

>Feedback mechanism, wheel velocity quickly reaches infinity
Yea, you're thinking of scenario 3, which I already covered. The speed of the conveyor would literally need to accelerate to a speed high enough to overcome the power of the jet engines, with the only point of contact to the plane being a set of freely spinning wheels. That velocity would completely destroy the plane, the wheels, and probably anything nearby.

No because treadmills don't generate lift. How could a treadmill "take off"?

no its a fucking toy moron

all of u guys r retarted the plane cant take off because it'd hit the treadmill

No it will not because there would be no air moving over the wings to supply lift.

What are her implants made out of that it won't break on cement.

Will it take off, Sup Forums?

Those are no implants.

No the treadmill will cancel out the motion of the airflow from the fan

Hence

force A (Treadmill) ----->

No because the rest of the treadmill is in the way.

itll crash right into the fan idiot

>scroll through this whole thread
>see no mention of the original mention of this theory
>mfw gavin free came up with this whole concept on the rooster teeth podcast years ago
>mfw you guys are arguing about something that was answered by an Oxford biologist

...

youtube.com/watch?v=989FrJIzo0U

yes

are u fucking kidding me dude

no.