S/fur

s/fur

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OLpeX4RRo28
youtube.com/watch?v=rcOFV4y5z8c
youtube.com/watch?v=HEYbgyL5n1g
youtube.com/watch?v=pVbLlnmxIbY
rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=xin-wei
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

That is a motherfucking anteater. And she's actually really cute. Wow.

...

...

...

Zero requests that some sharks and dragons are posted.

Sorry, had to do it.

...

You people and your glorious porn. How many furry pictures do you think you've seen in your lifetime (porn and no porn).

...

requesting any other picture from this series

Probably close to 750k or so. I alone have 70k and have posted a total of about 250k.

...

What part is that?

That would be the cloaca, dear Zero. That's where you put your peepee.

PLEASE POST RAINBOW GIRL EATING HOTDOG

Post all your shark and dragon stuff.

...

...

How do I into framerate independent game logic?

A scwillion

Sorry, can't do requests, my folder isn't organized.

Does this ever happen to you, your about to fall asleep or close your eyes and hundreds of furry pictures flash in front of your eyes. It's happened to me a few times and it's really cool

I prefer to use the terms: cock, penis, vagina, and pussy.

Can't say it has. And that's a dude, by the way.

...

Fair enough, Mr. Lucky.

Hey, someone post a thread with this image then let's see if we can match it up in catalog with the matching image I'm gonna post right now

I'm gonna use the text "daily reminder that" so whoever posts this can finish the sentence however they want.

I haven't seen Draka in a while. Wonder what (s)he's up to.

Mr.lucky?

You got 777

>Not 23.jpg

Come on, friend.

...

Really?! Has anyone here experienced furry images getting stuck in there imagination. It's rare but cool when it happens. You can almost rendering them walking around in vibrant detail.

...

plz

hol up
Is that the necklace from shark boy and lava girl

Possibly. I haven't seen the movie since I was a wee lad, and watched it at the theater, so I don't remember.

Oh...I did...

...

...

...

Alright, now to see if they magically line up on a board where I can't bump my own threads.

...

...

...

...

That's 2cute

Any one agree that nuclear fusion is the power source of the future?

...

...

I'm more curious as to when we'll start finding "physics-violating" power sources.
We already have an engine that disobeys conservation of momentum, and our universe comes from a massive violation of the conservation of energy.

Never going to happen. The fear, misunderstanding, initial costs for reliable reactors, and general ignorance of it means it'll be waaaaay in the future if we don't find another source. Our current reactions are shitty, ill maintained, and not common. The fear of another meltdown - which is immensely unlikely if constructed right - clouds the public eye.

>reactions
Reactors. Though technically that isn't incorrect.

Please expedite your untimely demise

Except Lockheed-Martin is already making a fusion reactor the size of a semi trailer that will produce 100MW iirc.

Please youtube.com/watch?v=OLpeX4RRo28

Damn, this fox girl gets me every time.
Is there more of her?

Yeah, Lockheed fucking Martin. Not your typical city's reactor. Maybe it'll start changing the minds of people, but I wouldn't get my hopes up. After Chernobyl and Fukushima, no way it's happening soon. Same with the Alcubierre drive and any other "groundbreaking" science. Hogwash I call it. If it's infeasible then it's at least impractical. Meaning no one wants to spend millions and millions of dollars because "nuclear fusion is dangerous!".

...

MIT had a tomahawk reactor and got the plasma to 2 atmospheres of pressure.

And? We don't even have properly function reactors currently.
youtube.com/watch?v=rcOFV4y5z8c
youtube.com/watch?v=HEYbgyL5n1g
youtube.com/watch?v=pVbLlnmxIbY

Those were fission, a fission reactor meltdown wouldn't be nearly as dangerous.

Here I did a google image search found a rule 34 page for the artist
rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=xin-wei

What does it matter who is developing it? If it's a viable source of energy, the private sector will either invest in it, or it won't. Fuckin' commie.

Oh, that's right. Regardless, you're only further proving my point.

How's it going dudes?

Damn auto correct, it was supposed to say 'a fusion reactor meltdown wouldn't be nearly as dangerous'.

Meh, playing Blood Dragon to pass the time.

Commie? Nice ad hominem. I presented you with a perfectly valid argument explaining why you're wrong and it won't happen, and you simply call me a "commie". Great argument. Now find out where we both are on this chart.

Note ->

Fair enough. Decent?

Wew lad. Nothing you said made you a commie, it was a joke. You didn't prove me wrong so much as you have an opinion that "fusion is never going to happen," and I stated LMT is making a reactor.

...

I'm good. Just telling people why nuclear fusion won't be our primary energy source any time soon.

Again, you're further proving my point by mentioning that it's dangerous. Saying that it "wouldn't be nearly as dangerous" still implies the inherent danger of it. That's not to mention the cost associated with, a. building the reactor, and b. maintaining the reactor. We can't even keep up our current fission reactors which are few and far between. Do you REALLY think we're going to be using FUSION reactors any time soon? Nah, son.

And I'm telling you why it won't happen.

...

Yeah, it's pretty fun. Although, I have no idea what to do now.

...

What I don't get is why people are so obsessed with the latest technologies. Why do people do that? "B-but so-and-so is making it!" Who fucking gives a shit? Unless it's going to be in every major city within the next year then it doesn't matter. And fusion reactors are sure as fuck not going to be on that list as cool as it would be.

I dunno. Maybe I'm just a jaded cynic, but I don't see the point in obsessing over neat ideas like that because they're just that: ideas. It isn't reality, yet.

Of course it won't. It's not a fully tested and functional energy source yet. Solar, wind, hydroelectric and all their variants are the likely candidates.
google is your friend.
I'm more interested in rocket sciences. Fission pulse boosters and plasma engines in the next 5 years. Sign me the fuck up.

I mentioned Lockheed-Martin because they specifically said they were developing that reactor with a certain output within a (relatively) short timespan. Nothing obsessive about it, it was just relevant to the topic and worth mentioning.
Wind power is not viable, it's far too costly to maintain in it's current state. Solar has come a long way, though. Sucks on a cloudy day, obviously.

Exactly! That's why I'm telling people to not get their hopes up about it.

Now rocket science is cool as shit. I don't keep up with it, but stuff like that is awesome. I want to see the SR-71's successor, and see scramjets in use.

...

...

...

With the current turbines yeah. But I saw somewhere some prototype which uses vibrations from the wind instead of fan blades.
Astronomy is one of my big things. And rocket science as part of that. Not big on planes as much but I am keen to see scramjets used.

Astronomy is pretty cool. I've always found astrophysics to be one of my favorite STEM fields. Theoretical physics too. Of course, I'm not nearly educated enough to be apart of it.

Vibrations? Sounds interesting, at least

...

From my reading it would only be dangerous to the people standing right next to it because of the plasma

...

...

Go ahead and tell that to everyone else. The average person is remarkably stupid and ignorant on such a topic. They couldn't care less about nuclear fusion, and probably couldn't even tell you the difference between fusion and fission.

...

Night everyone, I shall await the day of eternal glory that many of you will experience in Valhalla.

...

Fare thee well, brave warrior.

...

Why not use thermal turbojets?

I don't have the mathematics for it. If I was able to do more than basic calculus and trig I would be able to go into it.