Any physicians here?

Any physicians here?

What will happen if we use enough energy and enough force concentrated in a small area?

There's going to be a lot of energy and a strong force in that area.

You mean: "Any physicists here?"

no im employed

You will create a black hole if you accelerate protons in a small isolated area

/thread

Im autistic, does that help?

No.

What will happen if I create a black hole?

you physically cant

Actually, you will not. To create a black hole you need enough matter to have it compress itself into a black hole. If you just accelerate protons you will still only have the mass of two protons, wich is not enough to pull in and compress more materia. Black holes are not created by density, but by mass, wich then increases the density. when the pressure is high enough that the atoms can no longer keep eachother apart, protons and electrons will form neutros -> neutron star. If this neutron star is big enough it will become a black hole.

you will die.

>physicians
I'm a physician. I know a little about physics too if your image is implicating your true intention. I can't tell if pic unrelated or brain dumb.

After two weeks of christmas food, I think I'm well on my way already.

Mate, everyone on this board apart from a tiny minority are too stupid to understand degeneracy pressure, it's not worth explaining these things to them.
Let them believe the 'LHC creates black holes' meme.

I guess you're right.

is there a doctor in the house?

> In principle, a black hole can have any mass equal to or above the Planck mass (about 22 micrograms).

Since you're asking for physicians, I'm assuming that's a cunt and you want to Fuck the Universe

Mate, I'm from Europe. If there's anything we understand it's degeneracy pressure.

It's something I've learned after people keep asking me to 'please explain string theory' to them when they hear I'm studying physics.

There's a reason we go to uni for this shit.

does anyone have this in higher resolution?

and the ugly people losers smell like poop but try to insecure to hurt me the ugly way even tho the ugly people losers that smell like poop is short and smell like poop and try to judge people and smell like poop and is fat and smell like poop and is goofy and smell like poop and cock block people from getting money and women the ugly way and the ugly people losers smell like poop and outnumber everybody and smell like poop

google 'gravity well' until you find something you like.

Cultural sciences fag here. Yes, I agree. Some shit just isn't worth explaining, some things are jargon for a reason. Better to just avoid some discussions and arguments, better to spend that time on fun shit instead.

Yeah why do you ask?
>physicists

and the ugly people losers smell like poop and try to judge me and fuck there parties and the ugly people losers smell like poop and i dont care if i make things akward and the ugly people losers smell like poop

and there ugly and pathatic and smell like poop and smell like poop and there ugly and the ugliest of them all but try to judge people and the ugly people losers smell like poop and there ugly and smell like poop and there ugly and the only thing good about ugly people losers is using them for money and the ugly people losers smell like poop or other connections and the ugly people losers smell like poop and if your broke and the ugly people losers smell like shit

Asking for phyisicists on Sup Forums -can't even spell it right. B8

I don't think not being able to understand a complex topic of a highly specialised field really implies a lack of intelligence. Maybe disinterest or lack of motivation. I understand nothing about quantum mechanics but am capable of other things that are seen as "intelligent".

I personally think a sizeable portion of Sup Forums are smart (and expect any response to that being that I'm stupid). Maybe I'm just optimistic but inferring intelligence is difficult if you instinctively base it on what you think is smart. Seems arrogant to me.

You're probably right though, explaining physics to Sup Forums would not be worth it to you.

Black scientist detected.
You just keep them.Nothing happens but you might get free some particles before they destroy themselves in a theory.

'Stupid' was just meant as shorthand for 'Have not studied and therefore do not understand even the simplest implications of Newtons laws let alone have the mathematical skills or knowledge of quantum theory, relativity etc to even have a chance of taking anything meaningful from a real explanation of the formation of black holes.'

You can see why I didn't type that though.

Show your work because this is absurdly idiotic.

But if you ask blackholes you should use mass instead of energy.Not free energy equals mass.In another theory you can crate a blackhole which exactly what some dead stars do.

It's a mouthful.

You're right, but the pressure from the huge amount of materia is the cause for the density?
I just about to finish upper secondary school, and haven't studied the subject more, so my knowledge of the subject is still quite limited.

As an object accelerates, its mass increases. At the speed of light, any object with mass is said to have near infinite mass, so it would weight the same as the condensed star but it would be smaller, tearing the continuum and creating a black hole.

>At the speed of light, any object with mass is said to have near infinite mass

No, you misunderstand relative mass.
The mass of the object doesn't actually increase, adjusting the mass you input into the equation is just a correction as the equation breaks down at such high speeds.

True mass as it is called is independent of reference frame.

To elaborate, relative mass is a 'made up' concept that is just the mass of the object modified by the lorentz factor. The changing is done by the lorentz factor, the mass doesn't change.

Well this turned out to be an interesting thread.

This, relative mass is a joke that only meme scientists use to make it easy for normies to understand special relativity. Even Einstein himself called it out:

"It is not good to introduce the concept of the mass M = m / 1 − v 2 / c 2 {\displaystyle M=m/{\sqrt {1-v^{2}/c^{2}}}} M = m/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} of a moving body for which no clear definition can be given. It is better to introduce no other mass concept than the ’rest mass’ m. Instead of introducing M it is better to mention the expression for the momentum and energy of a body in motion."

A physical example of this are Neutrinos travelling at near the speed of light.

They have a mass, if what was saying was actually true, just the fact that they have a mass (even though it's minute) would cause them to be creating black holes all over the place, or at least create insane gravitational fields as they travel through space. This doesn't happen though, we measure them arriving without our solar system being crunched.

You could get an explosion

>Any physicians here?
You would need some xanax

Nice reply.Lorentz equations was for the speed first.But it is not that much hard to realize time acts like opposite of mass.We use it for mass but there is not a exactly truth that speed effects mass.We only know speed effects momentum.But it is just a theory anyways.