WTF IS THIS FAGGOT SHIT!?!?!?!?!?

WTF IS THIS FAGGOT SHIT!?!?!?!?!?

Other urls found in this thread:

nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/the-sinatra-group/n10008
twitter.com/AnonBabble

oh my~

That's fine. What bothers me is that this is news worthy.

honestly star trek is a franchise where this sort of shit is actually appropriate

>changing social mores in mind
what did they mean by this

Sulu was always obviously gay

>first gay character

......

Social justice propaganda.

it's just a simple one-scene homage which is not going to be integral to the story, he's not gonna be sassy for the whole movie nor he's going to flirt with kirk.

I get it, it's suprising because star trek itself is gay

unless he's literally going to suck a cock in the latest flick, then why do I need to know if he's gay or not?

the whole enterprise could be cock gobblers part time, or pussy whippers.. but why do I need to know that????

Will he jerk off someone on a radio show?

gay agendas

Why do we need to know Kirk is straight? That gets shoved in our faces constantly

I am completely surprised the gayest character on the show turns out to be gay.

i could imagine kirk as bi desu. that dude just fucks everything he can. if you're happy to fuck literally a different species, i don't see how you'd have a problem with a dude

Brought to you by an old gay man desperately trying to hold onto his small fame from star trek years ago by sharing memes on facebook and inserting himself into comiccons

why is bond ? that gets shoved in your face.
might as well make every character gay even though it has no bearing on the advancement of the plot.

So characters being straight has bearing on the plot, but characters being gay doesn't?

>Look we put in a short scene that shows Sulu is gay
Great! where's the trans representation?
>*silence*
sigh

does that mean his daughter is adopted? btw his daughter was asian in star trek 6, does that mean he adopted an asian girl?

From the sound of it, it'll just be a scene where you see him saying goodbye to his partner. Presumably as part of seeing other crew members doing the same.

I'm sure Star Trek has artificial womb technology, but adoption would fit their social values too.

not becasue they are straight but if they are its to carry the plot forward.

you can't just have a character have his orientation on display for no reason. it must serve a purpose. that goes for everything written in a film.

if sulu is gay then how does that advance the plot? otherwise its just a propaganda scene.

we know why bond is straight. he's a womanizer. its the character. sulu being gay, does...what? who cares if he's gay.

homage to takai? fine but lets not act like its this great thing. its functionally propaganda.

>expecting anything less from Jew Jew Abrams

Say what you want but leave George out of this shitslinging

>only straight people can have romantic subplots otherwise it's SJW propaganda

Ah I see, you're an idiot. Fair enough.


They have a Japanese guy, but where's the Korean, Chinese, Nepali and Burmese characters? You call this diversity?

>it'll just be a scene where you see him saying goodbye to his partner.


alright, thats not that bad since it won't affect the pacing of the film IF they don't spend 3 minutes on that shit as if sulu is such a pivotal character.

>not writing
>not directing
>it's gotta be his fault

lel

Those were just the first Pornographic-Americans
doesn't count

This isn't SJW stuff, it's a tribute to George Takei who is a pretty cool guy.

Gay acceptance

No, you should instead conceal all sexuality. It has no place in the media. We don't need to know this about any character, as it's totally irrelevant.

>dat spit
well at least one of them was into it

ah I see you have blinders on to any viewpoints that aren't your own preconceived ideas.

I said nothing about sjws. romantic subplots are not the function of the secondary charcters, adn only work as a point or counterpoint to the main charcaters plot. otherwise it's just filler.

and sulu is hardly a secondary character. he's 3rd tier of the cast.

no wonder people like shit movies so much. they have accepted bad writing. maybe why they accept gay propaganda in movies.

I like it and it's a nice tribute. Also Star Trek needs a few gay characters or it'll be pretty strange, like there are no gay humans in the future. Some may like that, half decent people would think it a retarded omission.

You're right. I think we should outlaw product placement in movies. It's just propaganda. (Well, it is)

not i bonds case though. thats a big charcater flaw that propels the plot. though it is rarely written well in most bond films.


>you should instead conceal all sexuality

for the most part I agree. I like movies most when they stick to the plot and don't force romance just because. unless its crucial to the plot , it slows the pace of the movie.

Isn't this more like a transgender thing though.

nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/the-sinatra-group/n10008

Milli Vanilli what is this faggot crap?

>outlaw product placement in movies. It's just propaganda. (Well, it is)
lol it really is. and it can take you out of a movie just as easily if done incorrectly.

its more of a porn thing disguised as progressive thing.

daily reminder that only juveniles and insecure little men have any problem with homosexuality. by the stream of threads on Sup Forums today, it's evident we have plenty of both here.

>emasculates Japahinos for sjws
sounds like JJ alright

>daily reminder that this is bait

>ensures that the slanty will never get the girl
Jews fear the Samurai

This. I couldn't care less if they have a gay character in, something like 5% of the population is gay so about 1 in 20 characters should be, it's just the fact that they make such a big deal about it that sucks. When you put a character in just to show how awesome and progressive you are it sucks, which is the same reason all the shitty Mary Sue characters are going around these days. I don't know if this character is going to seem forced, but the media making such a big deal about it just motivates films to put in bland gay characters to make the news.

>guy that plays spock is gay
>give him black girl

>guy that plays sulu is straight
>make him gay because the guy that played sulu before was gay.

stupid as fuck.

2% of the population is gay

1 in 50 characters should be gay

Jews have a phobia of monoethnic societies

I get it, it's because the old actor is gay. Clever.

You're right, apparently i'm working with old debunked estimates. Still though, makes sense you'd have the occasional gay pop up in Star Trek with it being such a huge franchise.

But why did Sulu become gay in the other timeline? He was straight in the OT.

because the new timeline is shit.

OH MY!
also, bullshit theres been lots of gay characters in the shows, well not lots but many...maybe they mean first main character?

I'm so secure in my masculinity that I jerk off to gay porn

The ride never ends.
REEEEEEEEEE

You choose to be gay, user.

>WTF IS THIS FAGGOT SHIT!?!?!?!?!?

Puppetmasters operating the exact same way Soviets did in the cold war where they siezed absolute media controls where everything promoted their social ideologies

Why do we have two threads about this? I mean, the other one is full of literal faggots, but still.

This is major news, this is the biggest news story of the year next to captain america being a black girl.

They need something to get people to go to their site until the next terrorist attack or retarded Donald Trump comment.

It's the way movies are marketed now.

Thor:
>"IF YOU DON'T GO AND SEE IT THEN YOU'RE RACIST AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE APPROPRIATING HEIMDALL!"

Annie:
>"IF YOU DON'T GO AND SEE IT THEN YOU'RE RACIST AGAINST BLACKS PLAYING CHARACTERS WHO ARE OPEN FOR INTERPRETATION BY PEOPLES OF COLOR!"

Fantastic Fail:
>"IF YOU DONT GO AND SEE IT THEN YOU'RE RACIST BECAUSE THERE'S NO RULE THAT SAYS JOHNNY STORM HAS TO BE WHITE!"

Fatbusters:
>"IF YOU DON'T GO AND SEE IT THEN YOU'RE A SEXIST PATRIARCHIAL MISOGYNYSTIC SHITLORD! AND EVEN A LITTLE RACIST!"

Star trek:
>"IF YOU DON'T SEE IT THEN YOU HATE FAGS YOU INTOLERANT HITLER MONSTER!"

Weaponized public social shaming is not only a favorite tactic for shutting up critics, it's also apparently a marketing tool to sell movie tickets.

grow up kid

Finally all the years I spent protesting the lack of gay sex in Star Trek has been answered.

I wonder what other characters in the Trek verse were secretly gay and we didn't know it?

...

Not all paedophiles are also gay

>made the decision with Takei and changing social mores in mind.
Do they actually think they're going to change society by making straight side characters gay or are they just virtue signaling?