Why can't Amerifags admit that there is a gun problem within their country?

Why can't Amerifags admit that there is a gun problem within their country?
I'm genuinely curious

Other urls found in this thread:

cdc
nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3#12
cnn.com/2016/04/19/health/sandy-hook-lawsuit/
thehill.com/regulation/266107-gunmakers-should-face-lawsuits-from-gun-violence-victims-dems-say
thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/276591-sanders-on-lawsuits-against-gun-manufacturers
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

because muh freedums

Its not the guns. Its a lack of dead liberals

We don't, the media just says we do

>the guns are the problem

Celeb threads aren't the Cancer of Sup Forums, this troll thread bullshit is.
If you DO reply to this idiocy, just type 'nokosage' in the option field.
OP is trying to bait normal people into replying by starting an argument. Ignore him. He's never even been to the United States, and doesn't know what he's talking about.

cause its part of what makes our country great. It's literally in our constitution.

would you say that everything that your country is founded on is a problem?

guns account for a minute percentage of the murders that occur.

Man I bet you typing all of that up will really change the outcome of this thread. Props.

nigga wat

cdc gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

Going by these numbers we have more an issue of people mishandling toxins than gun problems.

Because guns are not the root cause of the problem. If we banned them we would simple have a "knife" problem or a "basball bat" problem.

So rather then go full retard and ban guns we let our law abiding population defend themselves with the best measures they can... a fucking gun.

Any stupid monkey can tell you if you take away guns that there is going to be a lot less "gun violence". however if you are capable of basic thought process you will look at what happens to the overall rate of crime after guns have been taken out of the equation.

The opposition to additional gun control isn't a failure to acknowledge there is a gun problem. There is already substantial regulation of guns, but these laws are not enforced, particularly against those who commit violent crimes.
Additional regulations would only be enforced against the law-abiding.

Only problem with guns is that niggers get their nigger hands on them. We have a nigger problem

Or kids drowning in swimming pools.

And i mean swimming pools are not built with the soul reason to kill children! they kill far more children then the things that are built to kill children!

WONT SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!

American are teh uber tuff guys who like to polish thier phallus... sorry guns.

the government says it's a gun problem, in reality it's a poverty problem. well-fed well-employed citizens don't go looting and robbing. Britain tried banning steak knives for this reason and look how it turned out. You have to give people a reason to go legit.

thats because niggers cant swim

Because a majority of Americans are retarded by most standards.

>knife problem
>baseball bat problem
No you wouldn't. No other country in the world has this problem.

I am an Amerifag, and there is a serious problem. In fact, most 'Muricans I know say there's a problem. I'm not sure where you're getting your information at about Amerifags not admitting to a problem.

Why do yurocucks care so much about what goes on in America?
I'm genuinely curious.

Please dont bring logic into this. Let the muppets recite thier NRA propaganda and just laugh at them.

Because it's basically TV for us
The only other thing we have is Coronation Street

as long as you americunts keep on imagining the need for a world police
-stay home, redneck, leave us others alone

USA has a lot of problems but guns isn't one of them

>send nudes

How could she resist that? Sooo tough.

We don't. Remove niggers from the equation and our gun violence rate is that of Belgium. It's not a gun problem, it's a nigger problem.

amerifag here and i'll say this:

>fewer guns = less gun violence

yes, i'm a gun owner

then get a fucking life, and leave us alone

>being triggered

>being this triggered

I don't think minute is the word you're looking for mate.

>"About 41% of the homicides worldwide occurred in 2012 with the use of guns, 24% with sharp objects such as knife, and 35% by other means such as poison. The global conviction rate for the crime of intentional homicide in 2012 was 43%.[9]"

Less gun violence but violence overall won't change much. If anything it would increase temporarily because muh government our takin are guns

But this makes sense. How dare you say something that makes sense?

We have a people (see: nigger) problem. Not a gun problem.

Look at Switzerland. Guns everywhere but there aren't mass shootings every other weekend.

But also,

Fewer niggers = less violence.

And yes I'm a nigger owner.

Top kek

thanks for agreeing with me, user :)

Do you really think our criminals on the streets will miraculously change their ways and turn in their guns upon a ban? The # of criminals here is innumerable, and the count in Europe is diminutive compared to ours, Eurofag.

...

nice b8 m8 I rate .000000000002/8

Is pointing out that guns were made implicitly to kill people by comparison to a moronic pool rant helping your argument?

But màaaaaahh guns you faggot sissies. The constitution demands i keep loaded automatic weapons under my bed for my kids to find dammit.

Can a basball bat kill 20+ people in a nightclub?

kek
kek x2

A Semi-truck can.

>blaming an inanimate object for a problem within society

Why not start suing Ford for causing drunk driving deaths?

A truck driven by one of your precious "refugees" can.

Betta Bin dat knoife der govvana!

very dumb logic there pal

Remember when Obama ordered the CDC to study gun violence in opposition to a 20yo ban on the CDC studying gun violence? Ever find out what happened to that much hyped study? Here it is:

nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3#12

Conclusion: effectively reducing gun violence has been found to hinge on three active policy implementations

>community policing
>educating the public
>closing bars an hour earlier

Notice none of those things deal with gun control.

That sucks your nation is so piss poor boring that you have to take an interest in other nations politics to be entertained. I can't imagine how shitty your nation must be. My condolences dood
>thread about an internal national issue
>mah team America epic may may
Yurocucks can't even be consistent. Fuck it must suck to not be American and just be bitter as Fuck. Waking up everyday. Knowing there's a whole nation of people that comparatively, make your life look like shit.

In the news tonight: Edgy emo teen clubs 30 people to death at his middle school. For more on this developing story lets cross to Mike....

We have too many nostalgic cowboys and niggers

This.

Fucking this!

Because Muricuns are the real terrorists.

It is funny that gun shooting retards kill more people a year in muricah than terrorists do world wide. So who is the real terrorist?

...

>see facts about guns
>they hurt my feelings so ill just ignore them
>i dont think they are really facts so i can say they are just made up bullshit
>let me dig up an artical that lumps all "gun deaths" including suicides and justified shootings is as "gun murders" and ill act superior!

Too bad no one at Bataclan except the peaceful followers of Muhammad had a gun...

Why can't germany and france admit there's a truck problem in their country?

But you'd think that a firearm causes more damage than a knife or bat? You can't really stop someone from shooting someone but you can restrain a lunatic with a stick.

>Innanimate objects are the problem

Those mudslimes must've fucked you silly, bubs

Typical liberal, you completely avoid answering my question. Nice logical fallacy there, pal. But theoretically, yes, it's possible, but it wouldn't be as easy.

My point is, even if you ban guns the people with malicious intentions WILL NOT TURN THEM IN, YOU FUCKING PRETENTIOUS FAGGOT.

Wasn't my logic.
cnn.com/2016/04/19/health/sandy-hook-lawsuit/
thehill.com/regulation/266107-gunmakers-should-face-lawsuits-from-gun-violence-victims-dems-say
thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/276591-sanders-on-lawsuits-against-gun-manufacturers

pretty much this
>we use to club each other with a stick and rocks
>must ban nature

No. the best way to kill 20+ people in a night club is by far to use a home made bomb(s) or toxic gas.

Which anyone with half a brain can do.

no source? great!

>I am fully retarded

Yes, you are fully retarded.

come and take them commienigger

Look, euroshit, its simple. Guns?Not a problem. Niggers, Moo-slimes, crazy fucks? Problem.

But it's much easier to just get a rifle and stick up on ammunition from your local walmart.

No, but an ideology did.

because there's also a rampant government problem and to "admit" there's a gun problem is to make the government problem even worse since if they can take their guns from them they've pretty much given up

The only gun in my safe built with the intent to kill humans in mind when it was made is my WW2 bolt action nugget.

The sporting AR and AK variants i have were built with the intent to put holes into paper or for hunting.

My cowboy guns were built with the intent to make a metal target go "DING!"

The claw hammer i have in my garage was made the the intent to hammer in nails and to pull nails.

The important thing to remember here is that it is not the intent of which an object was made. but the actions taken by the person holding it.

Here is your reply.

The point isn't that you can win pitched battles against a professional army with all its ordinance, as a rag-tag citizens' militia with small arms. The point is that you CAN FIGHT. You can bleed them. When they come patrolling through your neighborhood, you might be able to take a couple of the fuckers with you. Hell, you might even be able to run away and do it again; they couldn't engage in endless "manhunts" for everyone who resisted them. They'd never feel safe and there could be shooters behind any window.

Of course, they COULD call in the artillery and air-support and level your neighborhood, sure. What would this get them though? Well, it would piss a lot of people off when innocents died and play into the hands of rebels. It would make a lot of the soldiers in that professional military seriously consider whether they were doing the right thing or not. Finally, it would simply kill people, and NO ONE wants to rule a nation of corpses.

The aim of a tyrant is to control, not to kill. What they want is to be able to have militarized police & gestapo point guns at people and cow them into submission to whatever dictates they want to impose. If citizens are instead waiting behind their doors and ready to shoot first when the jackbooted thugs come around, they've already failed.

So, the point is to fight. If you resist, you're not being controlled, and you're also undermining attempts to control others who can't or won't fight. Yes, you might die, of course. However, that's why Patrick Henry said what he famously said, more or less.

"As long as people can resist, they can be free, and tyrants can never succeed." When you're talking about using swords, knives and clubs against modern military weapons though, it ACTUALLY becomes pointless, because you can't bleed them at all. They'll just shoot you with beanbags, rubber, water cannons, microwave guns and other submission devices.

That's why Americans having guns is so important.

>But it's much easier to just get a rifle and stick up on ammunition from your local walmart.

No it isn't, to get those you need to get a 3 day background check and a lot of money.

To make a bomb, all you would need is some household products purchased over the counter. Same goes for gas.

yes. somtimes gun thinks. and kills.

This, so much.

When someone in anti-gun Europe does start shooting up a theater, there's no one to stop him until his body count is in the dozens. Even many of your cops don't carry guns there.

In Chicago, which tightly restricts firearm more than most of the country, there were 800 homicides last year alone. Go ahead and try to blame that on white Americans with legal guns.

it's not as easy to randomly shoot 20 people

you are a brainwashed tv-drone and it shows, nothing IRL is as it's shown on television, just like porn

>oh shit, I'm angry, better start calling him a liberal and typing in caps, that will show him.

>even if you ban guns the people with malicious intentions will not turn them in
Australia 'banned' guns 21 years ago, haven't had a mass shooting or terrorist attack since. Hypotheticals about how bad people will still conjure up ways to hurt others are irrelevant as there is no evidence whatsoever to reinforce that claim.
>inb4 Nice. That's one incident

could you say it but use littlerer words, coz it takes so many minutes to read.

Then if it's so easy how come it never happens?

But we haven't even played cowboys and niggers yet.

So arming everyone is the answer?

Surely you can see the problem here, what if a politcal party tried to take military action like some of the countries that you've helped arm? I'm sure the Colombian government is riveted that FARC rebels can freely arm themselves in their American built capitalist landscape.
What happens when actual terrorists start operating in America and not these attention seeking fanatics. Will you be happy you've kept the firearms flowing?

Everyone always tries to whittle it down to "criminals will just use knives if guns are banned". But what if we round up instead of down?
What if the UN passed a treaty saying "all right Bois bombs are back on the table" surely you'd say there's no need for them in this climate and making them available is explicitly advertising their use.
The same way that being able to obtain guns easily is an excuse in itself to use it.

guns are made to kill living things.

But a hammer was build to put nails in wood.

So you are correct about the hammer, not about the guns

>SPOON FEED ME!


Ok now we take a closer look at the picture as we can see

>sources FBI and CATO Institute.

Rather then have 20 links they decided to list their main sources and if you do or do not belive them you can go to their sources and look the information up yourself.

However if you want spoon fed links then look at this.

>The important thing to remember here is that it is not the intent of which an object was made. but the actions taken by the person holding it.

I think the more.important thing is the fact that he is actually holding it in the first place. Lots of countries just dont have guns. Very peaceful places.

If you werent such a cock-sure country full of arrogant rednecks and special interest political groups you might learn somethibg from that.

The Orlando shooter had two separate government issued gun licenses, one to carrying public, and one a professional carry license. He passed multiple background checks. In any nation, regardless of even the most strict gun laws, he would have been legally allowed to own and carry guns.

>Doesn't know how easy it is to make a pressure cooker bomb or mustard gas.

Fucking moron.

the second amendment to the US constitution has already been infringed.

at the time it was written, US citizens could own the exact same weapons the government had.

now, you can only own certain firearms that are approved by the government.

I think I mentioned this before, you obstinate fuck, but the people here are different than there. Last time I checked, Australia never had gangbangers on the streets who steal and kill with near impunity, did they?

And before you condescend me again and say "hurr that's only a small minority try again", those types of people are responsible for 10x more gun deaths than every annual mass shooting.

I've had a rifle for 24 years that hasn't killed any living thing. I guess it's broken or something.

Except countries that dont allow anyone to have guns.

But you guys have guns and still have the massacres. More than most other places. While you're waiting for some gypo to shoot up an Italian cinema it's happening in your country all the time and usually the people to stop it aren't gun carrying eagle loving citizens it's the fucking police like everywhere else.

Where is this idiotic society that you cents keep talking about? Why aren't your lax gun laws beating the bad guys?

kek, a source is a link to the webpage containing the data or the ISBN from a book. source without leads are worth nothing.

But I found a similar image to yours, but saying something quite different!

You just havent had your mentally unstable moment yet. Give it time. Perhaps drink more.

eurofag

Again, if it's so easy why doesn't it ever happen?