ITT: The least talented member of the band

ITT: The least talented member of the band

>implying he wasn't an incredible lyricist, haunting and original vocalist, and also sufficient at guitar

RADIO

...

LIVE TRANSMISSION

Love the guy as a singer and lyricist, that being said...

...

Ringo Starr haha

Brian Wilson

DELETE THIS

>not Barney

He was still the least talented

Geologist = Ringo
Deakin = George Harrison
Avey Tare = John Lennon
Panda Bear = Paul McCartney

Ranked least talented to most.

Nick Mason

He couldn't play the guitar there's a quote from bernard sumner out there about how he was completely against playing the two fucking chords on love will tear us apart live

Charlie Watts.

>John not the least talented
>George not most talented
Opinion discarded

...

Avey is by far the most musically talented.

Lennon was actually the definition of talented, which was why he was the least musically skilled outside of Ringo.

Lennon rode off of natural songwriting ability. Paul and George actually worked to get better at their craft.

Then why is Joy Division so much better than New Order?

thats kurt

>Ringo the least musically skilled Beatle
wew lad

>implying

So talented other members did his parts for him

[Citation Needed]

What are you talking about? They used a session musician on one track in their early days because George Martin was paranoid. Have you ever listened to his fills on A Day in the Life?

o i am laffin

Yeah sure, just look at new order, definitly waayyy better than Joy division ... Curtis is by far the best of the band like said, your either one hell of a bait-machine or a massive faggot

"talent" is a meme

>the goth faggot thinks joy division was better than new order

/thread

>goth
>joy division
>assuming even for a second that New Order worth something

>KYS

Also Blue monday is poor af