>shitpost re-run I beg to differ. It's a clearly wilful (agent dependent/induced, or non-spontaneous, or artificial) structured (ordered, non-random / not noise-like) phonic sequence.
Michael Foster
>It's a clearly wilful (agent dependent/induced, or non-spontaneous, or artificial) structured (ordered, non-random / not noise-like) phonic sequence. Speak English please.
Nolan Stewart
You know what? Fuck that. The more interesting question isn't whether Stockhausen made music or not, but whether his music is good music, or bad music (a position you implicitly adopt).
Those are all words in the English language, put together in such a way that it is coherent to speakers of the English language. Protip: disregard the parantheses if you don't understand him.
Maybe you'll find the above electronic classical a more resonating experience than Kontakte. It's a very consonant, slow build-up of, essentially, canons and drones. (Radigue was fascinated by Tibetan chanting.)
Gavin Howard
To be honest, I am not particularly fond of it. It's too minimalist for me. I'm posting it for the fogeys. I'm trying to lure you guys into the pit of electronic music with the traditional harmonic treatment present therein.
I'm not a fan of Mozart's symphonies (although the 41st is pretty good). He's writing symphonies as if he's setting a non-existent libretto to music (some of his symphonies are very similar thematically to various arias from his operas too). This restricts the development in his symphonies significantly. An orchestra can do a whole lot more than a singer. That's what the symphony is all about: absolute instrumental music at its most intricate and clear. I doubt he ever cared much for this species anyway. I don't like Tchaikovsky's symphonies for the same reason; the music is too song-like. Missed potential.
Mozart's concerti however, are a thing of wonder. Here there song-like composition is an asset, especially for an instrument like the violin. Concerto No. 3 -- youtube.com/watch?v=tOPE5XIX4FE
Can you trip or something so I can filter your stupid opinions, it bothers me to have to read them every thread.
Dylan Brown
That's derivative as fuck. If you want to post spectral music, at least post the good stuff.
Pierres Sacrées, Iancu Dumitrescu youtube.com/watch?v=Z2CjcpIFwOQ (No electric or electronic devices are used in the performance by the way. It's all in-vivo on acoustic instruments.)
Jonathan Perez
Of course I could use a trip. But I won't. Get triggered shit-for-brains.
Bentley Sanders
what are the harmonic rules for 12 tone composition?
Dominic Hall
>organ continuo Why is this not a thing more often?
Aiden Adams
It is, you're just not listening to the right music
Elijah Scott
There are none. Dodecaphony revolves around harmonic elision.
Camden Gray
Except it isn't. Even in that video only the first movement had organ continuo.
Chase Powell
well clearly more than one note is allowed to play at once so what are the rules when that happens? Does each voice just have to contain some version of the row?
I recently realized I really enjoy classical music but getting into it seems pretty overwhelming.
Does anyone know of a good collection of most influential/well-known works or something like that? Something that has a bit of everything so I can get lightly acquainted with it and discover what I enjoy the most. I would love a download but I'll even buy physical stuff if you know any good ones.
