Only in america can president win election by losing 4 million difference in popular vote? How is that possible...

Only in america can president win election by losing 4 million difference in popular vote? How is that possible? Would any other country let someone who lost 5 million popular vote be a president, specially if he is racist and islamophobic? Trump lost 7 million popular votes to hillary and he is still gonna be president? Are you americans that stupid.and hateful??? Tell me this...why did you elect a guy who literally lost 9 million popular votes to his Hillary? If it was vice versa and hillary lost 10million votes difference like trump didyou would be all over her

Sad.

Yet if Hillary won electoral and trump won popular vote you'd be all over that.

>Trump won at chess, in a chess tournament
Yeah but if we were playing checkers, Hillary would have won!
You people need to kill yourself.

this /thread

The electoral college was created for this reason you mongoloid. The best candidate won because of it.

Good analogy friendo

Get over it, libtard.

Guys, this is Sup Forums 101
Sup Forums really needs to get with the fucking program

sauce?

Hey DIPSHIT, know what the recounts discovered? Trump actually had way more votes than originally counted in every case, plus it uncovered MASSIVE vote fraud, invariably favoring Hillary. If the whole thing had been audited you would have seen 60% of Hillary's "popular win" evaporate. Kindly fuck off.

There have been less than 100 counts of voter fraud on a national level since 2000. Go read more breitfart articles

Our Constitution tried to set up a government to make sure that it was fair no matter how populous a state was while still giving populous states a slight advantage (i.e. every state has an equal number of senators and different numbers of representatives). The number of electors that each state gets is the number of representatives in the house plus the number of senators. So California gets 55 electoral votes compared to, say, Alaska which gets 3. If we went by the popular vote, California would have an enormous advabtage over Alaska but because of the electoral college it makes it a little bit more fair. If it wasn't for our Constitution, the rest of the world would still have monarchies. Go fuck yourself.

Imagine you live in a community of 5 houses.
4 houses have regular sized families, and has 76 lazy niggers packed into it.

Should every person get a vote in the community, or every household?

source? Not that I don't believe you.

Kys

Toten alle juden

except in many countries you can win the popular vote but still lose.
Learn to election

If we had a popular vote then he would have campaigned differently and won it. It was always closer than the electoral map anyway.

Factually incorrect. I can't fix stupid so this thread is done.

>Only in america can president win election by losing 4 million difference in popular vote?

Except for literally every other democratic republic that isn't Greece or Iceland because OP is a literal mouthbreathing retard that doesn't understand that direct democracies are rare.

>How is that possible?
Research the basics of representative democracy and republics and then come back.

>specially if he is racist and islamophobic?
[Citation Needed]

Never forget that hillary won the popular by 6 trillion

where are you every time russian election fruad comes up every time they have an election?
oh that's right you're probably trying to not get put in the gulag

This right here. The most intelligent candidate won: Vladimir Putin.

The Republican motto: At least we're better than Russia.

> 4 million difference in popular vote
They were illegals so their vote shouldn't count
>specially if he is racist and islamophobic?
This shouldn't be a problem unless he was racist against white people.

Oh, but don't worry. The U.S. is a “democratic” country and a role model to all nations. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA