Agrees women and men should have equal rights

>agrees women and men should have equal rights
>is against feminism

Not hard to see why some men might think this way.

The more vocal feminists aren't striving to attain equality; they're after special treatment.

sounds about right

...

Nice try op

>extreme/vocal minority represents the group

>agrees women and men should have equal rights
>is against feminism
Yeah. It's called logic. What you said is representative of many men AND women btw.

...

That's some nice bait you have there newfriend, mind if I use it sometime?

Well, I guess if that's what the dictionary says then...

How is it bait? It contradicts the literal definition of the word. Is THIS bait?

>words don't mean what the dictionary says they mean, they mean what my personal special snowflake definition is.

>personal special snowflake definition
I guess you are a member of Black Lives Matter too.

It's about giving one particular group more rights, not about giving everyone the same rights. It's identity politics not equality.

>Advocacy of women's rights
Not men's rights
Not both men's and women's rights
Get that through your thick skull and into your tiny brain!

>minority
kek

I don't see the point you're trying to make

Says who? Some blog you read on tumblr with 300 views or whatever that has a 75% chance of being a false flag Sup Forums troll so that what the word means now?

this is indubitable and you all know it

Fuck you faggot

Feminism and Black Lives Matter have the same problem. They aren't about what they claim to be about. If they were, all feminists would be anti-Islamic and Black Lives Matter would be protesting in Detroit and Chicago every day of the week.

>if you like peanut butter on your toast that must mean you hate cream cheese on your toast
>including one thing means excluding another thing even though they aren't mutually exclusive
>"on the basis of the EQUALITY OF THE SEXES"

You tried... I guess.

Do you have any non-anecdotal evidence to the contrary?

what the hell? is feminism still brainwashing you dumb bitches?

>says who?
Says feminism, the definition posted above states it's about advocacy of women's rights. You won't find a feminist group that advocates for mens rights or any other group.

Yeah it's called going to a liberal arts college/university

Equal rights activist != Feminist
Do not be biased in your goals of furthering human rights

>ON THE BASIS OF EQUALITY OF THE SEXES

Supporting women's rights does not imply opposing men's rights you stupid shit

>If they were, all feminists would be anti-Islamic

The forms and practices of Islam that subjugate women, as much as any religion, they are against it.

Third wave feminism and ideal feminism are very different from each other

>actual retards still taking the bait

feminism has good intentions but when it shows up in places it's not needed, the supporters start to actively look for things to protest about to stay on the good side of things

This.

Third wave feminism is after gender superiority, not gender equality.

The point is that you are Egalitarian or Feminist.
>Feminist only worry about women's rights
It's in the definition
>Egalitarian is all people
You can't say you worry about all people's rights and say you are a feminist. You are blinded by PC culture and are actually an Egalitarian

OP how do you feel about MGTOW

Didn't say they oppose mens rights, if they truly wanted equality of the sexes they'd advocate for both mens and womens rights. Try to use some basic reasoning before you start screeching about how people that don't agree with you are stupid, it's not difficult.

>Tries to tell educated people feminism wants equality.

Dude, no feminist is seeking equality anymore. That ship sailed 35 years ago.

It's about man bashing now

>Feminist only worry about women's rights
>only

No. Literally no one fucking says that. Not the definition. Not one single feminist of any note says this.

>Egalitarian

Invented by anti-feminists. Feminism implies egalitarianism by this definition and it literally always has.

You are cherry picking... what the definition says is that it advocates for women's rights... not men's rights, as if men have all the rights and women don't.
>realsexism.com
Just a few of the issues that WRA don't care about

don't see any level-headed feminists reeling them in, so yep, you allow them to represent the group.

>Implying women have less rights than men

>Not one single feminist of any note says this
WHOA! slow down there buddy. we both know that there are definitely feminists who say this

It's not just men that understand it isn't about equality.

Less than 7% of women call themselves feminists but are for equality. Pew poll.

Can confirm.

>egalitarian invented by anti feminists
>feminism implies egalitarianism
>feminism implies anti feminism
That's some nice reasoning you have there.

Gives leftist organization's definition of feminism.

AYRTS,IA?

If a woman rapes a man (Which is possible, though harder)
and the woman gets pregnant, the man still has to pay child support.
The fact that men mansplain has nothing to do with dominance or balls, though uncomfortable they are, it has to do with size and angle of the coccyx.

Women do not ear 77% less than men in the same job, this number is taken from an economical average, not individual average.

Women take more off time and do less overtime then men.

Rape is not an epidemic in western civilization. At least, it wasn't until people started accepting refugees that do not care about western culture.

Rape in college campus is also a myth. Actually, government reports show that women are less likely to be raped on college campuses than after graduating. It is less than 2%

this

Correct. What the feminists say is what defines it.

This is why less then 7% of women call themselves feminists, but are five quality rights.

This is because they can see through the smoke screen that these man haters hide behind.

But but Google says it! Never mind my actions and words! Instead give only weight to liberal definition I found.

...

>Merriam-webster is a leftist organization

Using Google's definition of feminism is like checking Snopes for one of Hillary's scandals.

If a video existed of her killing Vincent Foster in a blue pantsuit, they would claim the story is mostly false because the story said her pantsuit was red.

I imagine the most common position among feminists is complete opposition to the draft, for men and women. Got any data?

Reminder: Do not reply to feminist threads, troll or not.

That's the next link tard. Do you even fucking Google?

Next tell.us all the primary definition of gay is happy because thats what the dictionary says and fits your narrative.

But how about you address the fact that polling shows WOMEN who are for equality refuse to call themselves feminists.

What do THEY know that you dont???

0/10

>Less than 7% of women call themselves feminists but are for equality.

Yeah, and it's a very recent phenomenon. Anti-feminists are pushing an agenda and strawmanning feminism. I understand nuance exists but it isn't that sensitive either, well established words, concepts, and movements don't just change over night like that over some counter-meme gaslighting shaming fickle people into believing words now mean what THEY claim they mean.

I liked how serious shit is being spoken on this thread even if it is full of ad hominems, but not simply degenerate fur and other kinds of porn.

Reminder to call them out on being a bait thread and post evidence that feminism is fraudulent for newfriends browsing.

>That's the next link tard. Do you even fucking Google?

I'm aware and that's my point. It's the same fucking definition for all intents and purposes, so what does it matter that Google uses the same definition and they are a " leftist organization"? Is Merriam-webster a leftist organization? If a leftist organisation said "breathing oxygen is condusive to sustaining life functions" would go suffocate yourself?

LOL...Doesn't know that isn't Merriam Webster definition, but Google's....derp

Hey, to prove my point look up the definition of gay. Google is liberal - their definition says homosexual.

Merriam Webster says Happy.

Now eat a dick and learn about links dumbass.

>post evidence that feminism is fraudulent

>Literally no one has yet to do this
>the smug faggot who made this post didn't even do it

>be OP
>post shitty feminism thread
>get triggered when anons post reasonable arguments against feminism
>unable to post any kind of decent counter argument
>shitpost on twitter about being raped while crying alone in a dark room

>be me russian.
>russian-georgian parents.
>glory to motherland.
>filhy capitalists with their cancerous identity politics and considering our glorious ideology to be for race mixing gives me autism.
2 sentences, comrade.
>women stay at home, cook, care for kids, assume womanly activities, guardian of the home.
>men work, earn a living, feed the family, strong role model to all mmembers, the guardian of his family.
Feminists are nearly always cunts.

I am against 3rd wave, and 4th wave feminism.

I understand why the may want voting rights, education, and I agree with that.

But traditionalism is the true way.

Women will always be weaker then men, both physically and mentally.

>triggered, comrade?

>What the feminists say is what defines it.

What DO feminists say my scholarly friend? Enlighten us.

Leftists quickly make changes to definitions WHEN IT SUITS THEIR AGENDA.

See they definition of gay for proof.

Of course, when leaving the old definition agrees with their agenda, they leave it. That is why they haven't updated the definition of feminism.

Oh, and stop lying. You said the definition screenshot was Merriam Webster. Weak back pedal isn't fooling anyone.

You publicly showed you are an unobservant moron.

>feminism is the same as believing men and women deserve equal rights

You sound angry user, are you feeling triggered because people don't agree with you?

It won't matter. Women's reproductive rights are on the chopping block. The Unstumpable Trump and Electric Fence Pence are about to crush modern feminism.

The Affordable Healthcare Act has already been repealed, and committees are forming to pick its carcass clean. With it all the breastfeeding regulations.

Planned Parenthood is about to be shut down.

The left pushed hard for 8 years, the right is pushing back.

Feminism has been polluted, perverted and subverted to such an extent that it no longer seeks equality. Modern feminists want men to be slaves to women. New age feminists, SJWs and political correctness culture as a whole are completely against equality and justice. They don't care about you unless you are dark skinned, female, religious (but not western religion) or a combination of the above.

R you happy people who cant afford healthcare are going to suffer terribley

Not triggered that people disagree with me, I already knew that. More triggered that no one has any actual evidence that feminists are opposed to equality or against men's rights, etc.

>if you cant afford healthcare move somewhere with universal healthcare.

>Canada.

>UH.

>Costs less to live there.

They're opposed to equality by the simple fact they only advocate for womens rights. Stop being a self centred cunt and focus on human rights and the needs of others instead of just your own needs.

>R you happy people who cant afford healthcare are going to suffer terribley

Please try sounding less retarded.

I'm stating the facts. Nothing more.

>Leftists quickly make changes to definitions WHEN IT SUITS THEIR AGENDA.
>See they definition of gay for proof.

It's utterly immaterial to anything being discussed. Again, if a leftist organization claimed you needed to breathe oxygen to live, would you suffocate yourself?

>Of course, when leaving the old definition agrees with their agenda, they leave it. That is why they haven't updated the definition of feminism.

We aren't talking about anything except feminism. YOU brought up the word "gay".

>Oh, and stop lying. You said the definition screenshot was Merriam Webster.

No, I didn't say that. I actually went and clicked on that link and looked at MW's definition to be sure to make the point. My logic was: user thinks Google using X definition for a word means they are a " leftist organization". See that a non-political dictionary uses the same definition. According his logic they must also be a leftist organization. Thus:
>Merriam-webster is a leftist organization

Thought this was obvious.

>caring about x means you don't care about or even oppose y

It's not working.

Wanting one particular group to have more rights then every other is opposing equality. You can't fight for equality without advocating for the rights of other groups.