Is this true?

Is this true?

Your graph doesn't even represent anything

What do you even measure ?

woman or dude asking?

It's a distribution dumbass.

well just have t asume that the percentages are how much they rate i guess

Women having an unwarranted sense of self importance/worth, yes.

Distribution of what ?
If you don't name your axis, they don't represent anything
Retard

Think about what this means. Men are much more likely to engage in conversation with a woman online than the reverse. Therefore, women have the luxury of being able to be more choosey. They will get 100 messages a month, so why not engage with the hottest 10 percent of those who message?

its attractiveness vs % of people on okcupid
do you want a number for attractiveness you retard or what

This measures the likelihood that any one data point will fall into that column. By percentage, which is shown.

Dumbass.

distribution of the population surveyed. If you're not a retard, it's quite clear.

The graph is saying that most of the women that paticipated in this say that 80% of men are below average, while men have a more equilibrated thoughts

Are you blind, or just retarded?

Whereas the men of all age groups consistently rated 20-year-old women the most attractive (which produced a very lopsided chart), their ratings of all women in general produced a very symmetrical chart. In Rudder's book he even describes it as "close to what's called a symmetric beta distribution - a curve often deployed to model basic unbiased decisions." Therefore it appears that men are very unbiased/honest in the way they rate women.

They don't need to directly name the axis if they tell you the fucking measurement, retard. What are you 12? It's a distribution of ranked attractiveness. They didn't put in the arbitrary numbers that they used to gather their data because... They're arbitrary.

btw its a plotting of actual data. asking if its true is kind of useless. the real question is; is it true of people in general, and not just OKcupid users.

Nah, it's not accurate.

Reason being women base most of men's attractiveness on things that aren't looks.

Women evaluate a man mainly for social skills/wealth/power/humor. Looks take a back seat, but they do certainly help.

And so much of a man's attractiveness is weighted on social skills that if you don't have them you MUST work at it. To get any woman.

How men are judged:

50% social skills
15% power
15% wealth
10% sense of humor
10% looks

And yeah, I pulled those numbers out of my ass but it seems about right....

Any wealthy/powerful man will be treated like they're *very* physically attractive by nearly any woman.

>the numbers aren't accurate because I changed the parameters
Its raw data. this is how the women actually "voted"

Seems like women prefer men slightly older than they are up until age 38 or so, then they like them slightly younger.

>I made up arbitrary figures based on my sole opinion
>trust me more than the data set
The fuck?

Lol, fucking retard. If there's anything OkCupid does right it's collecting statistics.

This guy gets it.

I'd like to see how they weighted this. I have a theory that women are much more likely to browse the site deliberately, actually looking for people they have a chance of being in a relationship with, whereas men surf all available accounts and rate them accordingly.

It is accurate, its just an accurate measure of how women respond to male looks on an online dating site.

Also your percentages are bullshit, if a guy is an extremely good looking and wealthy athlete but is basically autistic is he going to get more or less girls than a guy who works as a plumber but has extremely good social skills? Your distribution implies the plumber does better, but I doubt that's how it goes down at all.

I think common sense is located in the penis. It's the only way to explain why women lack it so badly.

oh so a really good looking billionaire is half as successful with women than an obese homeless man -- so long as the homeless man is sociable, right? lulz

He did the same thing sjws do.

you morons, these % are right in cases of an average man. Ones that are ultra rich or famous have a green card for pussy and nothing else matter.

i just..... i can't. the fucking racism here. you people are ill literally shaking right now..... wow.....just. just wow. literally unbelievable. ill never understand this......place. it feels like after the past 2 weeks i have been here it just seems to get worst and worst..... blatant racism child porn spam animal abuse anti semitism holocaust denial woman hating homophobia fat shaming off topic adult cartoons the list goes on and on....... the n word literally hurled around like it was a casual insult...... are there even moderators to control this insane place??!!! disgusting.....are you even "humans"? or just jaded pieces of SHIT??!! i see why you people are callled the sewer of the internet...

i am with you user, this really is a poor distribution graph

It represents that women find MOST men physically unattractive where as men find women attractive based on a smooth gradient.

Think of your wife/GF/prospective. Think she is you are attractive to her, guess again. Want to know why a hand full of guys are doing 99% of all the fucking while half of the guys aren't getting laid at all? This is why. Welcome to the disposable sex, where the only rule is out last and out live while distinguishing yourself as indispensable.

Game on. Don't suicide user.