>traditional folk
>100,000+ years and still strong
>classical
>2000 years and still arts peak
>jazz
>100 years and still improvising
>electronic
>80 years and still innovating
>rock
>50 years and already dead
>traditional folk
>100,000+ years and still strong
>classical
>2000 years and still arts peak
>jazz
>100 years and still improvising
>electronic
>80 years and still innovating
>rock
>50 years and already dead
>>traditional folk
,000+ years
Citation needed
go to bed turny
10s not applicable? What about King Gizzard?
electronic came before rock? Didn't rock begin in the 1950s with the likes of Chuck Berry? The fuck kind of electronic music was being made then?
m e m e
>Ben UFO
>Black Madonna
>Mall Grab
>Ricardo Villalobos
>Kode9
These are the real artists who will be remembered from this generation. Every other Sup Forumscore artists you fuckers like will be pretty much forgotten in a few years. This is a fact.
>100,000 years
kek
Traditional folk music has existed since man first bashed 2 rocks together.
OP is memeing but that's actually relatively accurate. Synthesizers were around by that point, and classical musicians experimented extensively with them.
>EDM
>rock
>boring
lol op
It's not dead, it's just branched off into punk, post-rock, mathrock, pop-punk, hardcore, shoegaze, post-punk, metal, and all sub genres of metal
>The fuck kind of electronic music was being made then?
Pierre Schaeffer and Halim El Dabh were recording electronic music in the 1940s
You're proving his point
Stop posting this b8
Is it the 90s again?
>his point
Fuck off OP
You're actually missing a fucking chromosome if you think all of those aren't rock to some degree
What album is Les Ondes Martenot? The only info I can find is on a 2000s twee pop album by a band of the same name.
>It's not dead
>posts dead subgenres from 2 decade ago
this
>100 years and still improvising
This is a weird statement. It's like saying:
>classical
>2000 years and still notating
Like, improving is just the way the music's made.