POV porn XD ahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

POV porn XD ahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Nice.

Is this shit for real? A world collapses on me right now kinda.

pmub

the mystery is gone now...

> Watches pov porn
> Doesn't care if camera never pans down enough
> Implying porn isn't already an illusion even if actually fucking

This is how it was back in the day, when cameras were that big. Now our phones take much, much better video than that giant contraption.

wise answer, nothing to add

>Now our phones take much, much better video than that giant contraption.
But no more accurate.

this guy knows what's up

u know shit about cameras

AMAZIN

>u know shit about cameras

You're an idiot. My phone takes 4k video at 60fps. That thing does not even do blu ray quality. Fuck off.

Topkek

A little bit of fancy camera work, a little bit of acting, a whole lot of editing and BOOM!... Movie magic.

You dumb fuck

>keeps calling people names
>thinks he is winning an argument

Bullshit. Cameras are still that big and widely used. Google "Sony PDW-700" one of the few standard devices for electronic news gathering.

I like the look on the male actor's face...
> imma gonna give this whore the fake fucking of a lifetime. Gonna fake dick her so hard her grandkids are gonna feel it.

WTF are you blabbering on about? Did I ever say that cameras that big aren't used anymore? No. . . I said that our phone cameras are better than THAT camera.

And you'd still be wrong.

what kind of shitty pov porn are you watching where its not a single shot showing penetration

cellphone:
> tiny shitty lens
> tiny noisy as fuck sensor
> low dynamic range
> low bitrate / awful codec

Your 4K 60p doesn't mean shit. Why do you think pro cameras can still cost $10/20/30k+?

stop replying to obvious bait

Absolutely. This guy knows his shit.

Either way, I'm calling fake cuz I don't see why a porno production would choose this kind of camera. They usually use a much smaller/cheaper (but quality plenty good enough for porn) handheld camera and have the dude doing the fucking operate it.

lmao

Guessing you don't watch a lot of studio porn. Its pretty common to have 2 or 3 cameras (usually a couple of shoulder/stand mounts and 1 small handheld for close work) and a laptop for smashing out quick edits and post-production work before it gets done properly.

Only time the actor gets given the camera is when the studio wants 'real' porn, and even then the handicam guy usually stands behind the guy and shoots over his shoulder.

>Implying they don't use GoPros now

Based on that dude's hair, that bitch's awful fake tits, and the CRT TV, I'd date this clip to 1998 at the absolute latest. A serious pro camera of the type that would be used in high-end porn shoots (say a RED DSMC2-based rig) is going to be MUCH smaller that that thing.

yeah i guess 'studio porn' doesn't sound like the kind of thing i'd want to watch...

Nah... its pretty fucking boring. Fake tits, fake asses, fake noses, fake orgasms. Shoots can take anywhere from 3 hours to a few days for a single scene...

Boring to watch, boring to work on. Pay's pretty good at least.