Where were you when you realised lolicon is illegal?

Where were you when you realised lolicon is illegal?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

it's not though

Where's the proof?

...

Lolicon is pedophilia. You are by definition, a pedophile if you enjoy it.

Probably fapping to lolicon

lolicon is small cute girls ranging all ages. just most of it is underage and porn

Not illegal in the U.S. Try again.

You obviously haven't read the US PATRIOT Act.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States
Say it again.

It is?

it's not though.

what? you told me to say it again!

Nigga you're supposed to say it again after reading it, with AUTHORITY and CONFIDENCE in your answer.

i did read it. nothing about drawn pictures

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

here it is again
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

tickle my asshole miku

Simulated child pornography was made illegal with the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The CPPA was short-lived. In 2002, the Supreme Court of the United States in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition held that the relevant portions of the CPPA were unconstitutional because they prevented lawful speech. Referring to Ferber, the court stated that "the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Virtual child pornography is not 'intrinsically related' to the sexual abuse of children".

and again
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

Okay, then check the page that specifically talks about drawn pictures. Too lazy to link here.

yep.

u safe

that's nice

I think I missed it being too busy not giving a fuck.

Tell me why mods are removing actual CP
but not loli
there must be reasoning behind this

also here
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

Because people report CP, and they only check the report tickets.

she looks 18

also why is he barely sticking his dick in her ass WTF

bottom out faggot

U.S. law distinguishes between pornographic images of an actual minor, realistic images that are not of an actual minor, and non-realistic images such as drawings. The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene, whereas the first does not require a finding of obscenity.

Your moral definition of obscene is not the legal definition of the word.

look here it is again
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_the_United_States

United States[edit]
Main article: Child pornography laws in the United States
The legal treatment of simulated child pornography in the United States requires an understanding of the components of that phrase: pornography, child, and simulated. United States law treats these as separate concepts, each worthy of analysis.[citation needed]

In the United States, pornography is considered a form of personal expression, and thus governed by the First Amendment to the Constitution. Pornography is generally protected speech, unless it is obscene, as the Supreme Court of the United States held in 1973 in Miller v. California.[citation needed]

In 2002 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition that the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA) was facially invalid in prohibiting virtual or cartoon child pornography. The basis for the ruling was that the CPPA made unlawful some forms of protected First Amendment speech, banning depictions of sex between children even if not obscene and not involving real child victims. Under New York v. Ferber, if the depiction is of real child abuse or a real child victim, as a result of photographing a live performance, for instance, then it is not protected speech. Under Miller v. California, obscene speech is likewise excluded from First Amendment protection. The CPPA made all virtual child sex depictions illegal without regard to whether the speech was protected or not, so that part of the statute was struck down as facially invalid.

actually wrong
i reported loli several times
nothing happened

ok

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

because once they save it to fap to later, they don't want no one else to get a hold of it

also why does the pov perspective in these cgi clips always move with the thrusting? fuckin annoying.

cool
im not a pedo but i don't see why being one is such a big deal... i mean, as long as they aren't harming anyone, it's kind of like being gay... pedos get judged for crap they cant control

I'm sure all loli is 18 plus.
He doesn't want to her.

The problem is, being a pedo always involves harm towards children. Children need more protection because their feeble brains are not fit to process the advanced imagery of genitals larger than or the opposite gender of their own, nor are their bodies developed enough for explicit acts.

because its supposed to be what you are seeing when you are fucking her, duh

so you're a pedophobe huh?

>she looks 18
well with that logic, i'm off to fuck a 12 year old

How is watching loli or CP harm inducing? What's already out there will always be out there and watching it does not cause the person depicted to relive the pain, no matter what the SJW's tell you.

no it doesnt? lots of people have rape fetishes that don't rape gtfo

i mean thankfully with pixels they are what age you think they are because its imaginary? whereas your 12 year old was actually born 12 years ago??


logic?

>loli
It stimulates the inner paedophile, which may lead to harming children later, either directly (>rape) or indirectly (real CP.)
>CP
Children were harmed to create such content.

but we wouldn't be experiencing it like that. unless we were holding an oval tube up to our eyes.

With that logic everything we see or do may lead to harming others later. Games and movies included.

>Children were harmed to create such content.
Agreed, but it's already out there. Watching the content does not cause anymore pain than is already inflicted.

but that's only if they choose to fuck a minor
also what about the 12 year old kids nowadays that finished puberty lol
or the rare cases of >18 yr olds that haven't gone through puberty, why aren't they protected?

Yep, that's the argument all paedophiles invoke.

>Watching the content does not cause anymore pain than is already inflicted
Except that after viewing the real content, the paedophile will wish to view it in person, if you comprehend. This is more harm. It's the same logic as violent video games creating school shooters, terrorists, and other criminals.

Lolicon is not pedophilia, you may think of it on a moral compass as equal to pedophilia, but that's just your opinion and the more you plead ignorance the more you aren't helping your case

What's up you pedo faggets. I got all your IP addresses. I'm going to find you bitches, and rip your fucking heads off. Go ahead. Talk shit. Because we all know you'd never talk shit to my face.

pic related: it's me

tbh, I'd be more concerned about people killing in video games then.

i'ma have to support this

Don't argue with him. Someone with paedophobia doesn't know how to respond rationally.

>It's the same logic as violent video games creating school shooters, terrorists, and other criminals.
Yes, that's what I said. What's worrying is you saying you believe that.

And I completely agree you. I'm just parroting what the government says, because at the end of the day, they are the authority, and we must bow to them, as their unloving and intolerant nature yields no room for unlike-minded individuals.

Any person who thinks they're helping children by attacking loli is just full of themselves

find an example where a kid shot up his school or became a terrorist and specifically said it was bc of video games

Says the guy in his moms basement who weighs 110 lbs.

>Lolicon is illegal
>Using children in prescription drug or car insurance commercials is okay.

Fuck off.

Do it faggot

unwatching this thread because this is getting ridiculous.

Adam Lanza, perpetrator of Sandy Hook '12. His mother noted that he played violent video games on his computer, and did not wish to be disturbed. Police videography of his home shows a taken-apart (remember he smashed his hard drive?) gaming computer, confirming such suspicions.

hey cutie

>Using children in prescription drug or car insurance commercials is okay.
Because it's not harming the children.
>pic related

>pedophobe

It's fucked up that as a society we're one step away from being unable to criticize child molesters.

okay take people with autism out of the equation.
also without the lolicon stuff im pretty sure these pedos would resort to actual kids

If you subtract people with autism, the world has no paedophiles.

They did it with homosex, why not with pedosex?

i'd say we're pretty civilized... look at isis
especially since it's sinful to be a homo unless you do it with an underaged boy

...

...

Fuck you, now I have to smash my hard drive and get the fuck out before the cops get here.

A pedophile is not a child molester. Holy shit you Americans are so dumb.

welp, there you go; you said it yourself, it's a disorder

Okay, so paedophilia is a disorder, but homosexuality isn't? They're slices of bread from the same loaf.

Look at this wanna be tough guy. Also, that's not your IP. Now go kys.

Found the pedophile

yep
i saw a video on youtube where a guy holding a "love trumps hate" sign was breaking windows

Post pic of yourself with TS. Otherwise you're just an other weak ass pleb.

>Americans are so dumb.
Some are, some aren't, just like every other society.

Researchers have proven the average IQ of Americans is 20% lower than that of other developing countries.

>U.S. law distinguishes between pornographic images of an actual minor, realistic images that are not of an actual minor, and non-realistic images such as drawings. The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene, whereas the first does not require a finding of obscenity.

it is in Aus

>The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene
>legally protected unless found to be obscene
>found to be obscene
>obscene
That's your key word. Lolicon, as Sup Forums defines it, would be very much found obscene.

>20% lower than that of other developing countries
well, we're still developing

Indeed we are. We still haven't adopted universally accepted standards (Metric system, proper English, etc.) and much of the population lacks access to the basic utility of uncapped, high-speed internet.

Not to mention, that nig nogs drag down our averages. Most developed countries don't have the number of nig nogs, that the USA does.

Canada has more chinks and street-shitters than other countries but nobody bats an eye.

Fucking this, sexual deviations from the natural order. Eg.

>Same-Sex Relationships
>Relationships with those less then 14 (or who have not gone through puberty)
>Inbreeding

This in regards to procreation, for socilisation inbreeding, and same-sex can be seen as acceptable if not used for procreation. But simply put the starting point is puberty regardless of relation to whoever along as it's consensual.

I don't know what you're trying to say, but if it reminds Sup Forums that loli is illegal, I endorse it.

but chinks rank much higher than nig nogs on intelligence tests

And despite that, nobody claims Canada's IQ average is unbalanced. But that guy claimed it was for the US. Can we just discuss the original topic instead of these side rants?

me too!

I am agreeing with the person I am replying to that having sex with a minor (as defined by puberty not modern laws), same-sex relations, and incest are deviations from the natural order, Which is to procreate.

Though with that said, and curbing procreation for a moment. The act of same-sex relations, and incest can be beneficial from a social aspect. So really I am agreeing, and disagreeing to his comment. It depends on context.

There is no context where sex with a minor is appropriate but same-sex relations, and incest can be appropriate in the right context. Same-sex in the sense of bisexuality, and incest in the sense of bonding.

>Where were you when you realised lolicon is illegal?

Australia.

Lol, we chewed people like you up in basic. Your nothing but a balloon animal you wannabe.