POWERFUL: 'Birth of a Nation' Poster Sees Nate Parker in American Flag Noose

The heartbreaking new poster for director Nate Parker's Birth of a Nation continues the theme of powerful historical images for the movie's marketing campaign.

The image sees Parker's character, Nat Turner, being hung by a noose made out of the American flag.

“Resistance lives in the air in this current moment,” Parker explained. “Anyone who sees this film should leave the theater and feel compelled to be a change factor with respect to relations that are taking place in this country.”

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=I3kmVgQHIEY
youtube.com/watch?v=I3lFBq7_CPk
youtube.com/watch?v=MD6Rjyo77NY&t=10m20s
youtube.com/watch?v=qUmwyJEH_pE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

damn...

I wish we could have big budget white nationalist propaganda like this

nigga das racis

really makes you think...

I thought Birth of a Nation was white nationalist propaganda.

>heartbreaking

African-Americans reclaimed it like the infamous "N word"

He literally got the title 'Birth of a Nation' from a big budget white nationalist propaganda film you ignorant piece of shit.

youtube.com/watch?v=I3kmVgQHIEY

>making a movie celebrating a black man murdering innocent people in the name of black power mere months after a black man murdered innocent people in the name of black power

This will go over well with the non-cuck crowd

>eternal victims

Well, he deserved it.

Damn...so deep...

wait wait wait
are you telling me thats not jamie foxx? I even thought it was him when I watched the trailer holy shit

>first scene released shows him chimping out and murdering people
>second scene release is him in a noose trying to make people feel sorry for him

He a good boy he dindu nuffin.

nothing scares honkies like an angry black man.

It's the only thing they do well. That and sports; occasionally music

this

Jews have rebounded every time they've gotten rekt because they focus on succeeding in life through work, plus they always have each other's backs. Meanwhile black men are the biggest threat to black men, statistically speaking

It's Will smith you fucking racist

>yfw the concept of racism will never go away as long as idiots can exploit the idea of perceived racism for financial gain

>Jews
>not playing the victim card constantly

Funny how they're only an oppressed minority when it's convenient

are they remaking birth of a nation?

>this shit is 3 hours
what the fug

>BoaN comes out
>Sudden demand at colleges to have buildings named after Nate Turner
>Obama makes Nate Turner Day a national holiday before he leaves office
>Statues of Nate Turner are built in all major cities

I bet they'll leave out how they butchered women & children

No, just using the title ironically for an entirely unrelated movie about John Brown's slave rebellion.

Sorry user, it's a white person film, you're expected to have the mental capacity to process multiple hours of narrative.

This is literally more than a century old, you aggressive retard. It's "big budget" is not even a 100th of The Dark Knight's

i only watch kino thats 90 minutes or less. no long pleb shit

Just wait until Hillary is elected and we have a Janet Reno day

Sorry, Nate Turner's slave rebellion. Whatever, it's a black chimp out movie is the point.

They also killed women and children who were hiding. Do you think they're going to show that?

yeah they're taking it back

Whitey cucked again

>It's "big budget" is not even a 100th of The Dark Knight's

I don't think the amount of money spent on the dark knight movie even existed in that time period user, that's not really a fair comparison. You have to adjust for inflation and shit.

Sounds like exclusively watch pleb shit 2bh

>Janet Reno

Holy shit I forgot about that collectivist cunt.

"Hey remember when the Federal government sent a fucking swat team to steal a little boy from his family to ship him back to a communist country? Good times"

this

Just let it go, less than 1% of people in america at the time even owned slaves.

>Implying that was a bad thing

He had to go back.

>"We built this country"
>Half of the states never even had slaves

This is pure kino, don't fucking @ me.

100,000 dollars in 1915 adjusted for inflation is about 2,000,000 dollars in 2016. The Dark Knight had a budget of 185,000,000 dollars--Birth of a Nation wasn't even big-budget for its time, let alone 2016. It just was insanely popular and made tens of millions of dollars

white ppl so upset lmao i love it

Why is Sup Forums so upset over this?

I hope so, it will show that rebellion or revolution isn't necessarily black or white. Women and children don't suddenly disappear to magical women and children land during conflicts.

Sup Forums is populated by serious cinephiles who consider the D.W. Griffith to be one of the most significant and creative filmmakers in history. We're all deeply concerned that this film will not live up his virtually perfect filmography, which we've studied quite extensively and discuss frequently

Too bad. Your ancestors virtues are your future undoing. The Arabs were smart enough to castrate and kill their slaves while the Americans laid down their lives to end slavery worldwide. The cracks are already showing with whites themselves displaying a self-hating complex.

This is mostly true.

And white racism is still alive and well even after this. Just watch this documentary based on real events:

youtube.com/watch?v=I3lFBq7_CPk

Really makes me think. Fuck white people.

>doesn't show Arab slave trade
>doesn't show what blacks do to other blacks
>let's make movies to make you hate white people from 200 years ago

Wew lad, the tribe is really going all out next summer.

They weren't even that many anti-black movies in 1916 as much as anti-white movies in 2016.

People who know the story (read a fucking history book) knows how this plays out.

>Turner is a slave
>has a vision from God
>decides to lead a rebellion against slave owners
>kills something like 50-60 whites
>is eventually captured and hung
Of course slaves saw him as a hero. While white people saw him as a bucher.

>slave owners
>innocent
>raped and murdered slaves with no remorse
>innocent

Turner also spared poor white people during their rampage. They didn't own slaves and we're seen lower then normal whites.

Name them wherever you see their works.

disgusting if that flag was real it would have to be burned now

Hyped as fuck. I love that the butthurt threads are already starting

JUST LEAVE ALREADY

FUCK OFF BACK TO AFRICA

WHITE PEOPLE ARE LITERALLY BENDING OVER BACKWARDS FOR YOU

>MUH COP KILLS
STOP DOING NIGGER SHIT
GET A JOB
GET OFF WELFARE
MARRY A WHITE
PAY YOUR TAXES
BRUSH YOUR TEETH
STOP BUYING WIGS
STOP LISTENING TO RAP
STOP LETTING LIBERALS TREAT YOU LIKE A PET

wtf, I hate niggers now

This movie is fucking retarded. This is entirely racebaiting nonsense intended to further racial tension. It's not even about the birth of a nation, something which its namesake was about. The entire event was just a small and relatively pointless riot which served to accomplish nothing aside from the murder of civilians. I wish they had made this movie about the Haitian Revolution, which truly could be considered the birth of a nation, and actually was a somewhat relevant event in history. An uprising which involved tactic, wit, and perseverance.

>the 1% of the white population is representative of all whites

>hate niggers now
>now

I guess better late than never...

>MARRY A WHITE
Fuck off with your race mixing

and the academy award for best picture goes to.....

>This will go over well with the non-cuck crowd

so about 5-10% of US whites?

>An uprising which involved tactic, wit, and perseverance.

And now they're a 3rd world eating mud cakes. Let the state of every post-colonial african country be a lesson to self-righteous niggers everywhere. You need whitey to function.

Non american here. Is this slavery thing being blown out of proportions? I read that less than 5% of the entire US population at the time had slaves. But when I see a movie about that period of US history it makes it look like the entire country was a racist cesspool.

but whitey is the devil #blacklivesmatter nigga kill all crackers

Just saying man, they beat the whites before. Take that as you will.
>hurr they're 3rd world now
It wasn't even about that. I'm just making a point to say that, if they're going to use that title, at least make it accurate.

You underestimate how many white men are conservative. I would say that the majority are, although at least 40% of them are cucks.

It's the women that are all white guilt ridden SJWs

You're just being an ignorant racist, remember the six million slaves who died during the civil war.

FACT: every black man in america is STILL a slave, retweet for our brothas in chains.

Mostly rich southerners owned slaves, they weren't cheap to own. Slavery was outlawed in the north.

>Hispanic

Hispanic is not a race

Brown mesizto mexican indians weren't even consider hispanic until the 70s.

If you call brown indian Mestizos hispanic then you are falling for the kike meme for white people to be against the original hispanics like spaniards

isn't this movie about an historical event? what are you all so mad about?

From kings to slaves, shaking my head to be honest family.

I don't get how this is their argument. They have every opportunity possible

Sup Forums gets butthurt over movies that are "white guilt".
But yeah, this movie is based off a true story.

>what are you all so mad about?
Depends on who you ask.
As for myself, see As for the virgins, see any post that uses the word "nigger"
Example: REEE I hate blacks for being black

youtube.com/watch?v=MD6Rjyo77NY&t=10m20s

>enslaved the jews
>become enslaved by jews

P O T T E R Y

a historical event that included murdering children.

they have silenced us for now, but we will RISE UP and destroy the EVIL DOGS.

If you're a poor black person (like a significant portion of the black population) who also happens to look and talk like a poor black person, a good number of people are going to assume that you're a criminal/dangerous/unintelligent/etc.

Imagine people of the future living in a time where they don't have give recognition to the fallout of Hitler or slavery.

You need to check your privilege, user.

youtube.com/watch?v=qUmwyJEH_pE

They didn't kill all whites

>poor niggers aren't criminals
never go full retard user

Libshits still go back to the Crusades to justify what muslims do today.

Leftists will never move on.

Isn't nat turner the porn guy?

It's giving itself more importance by appealing to the current sociopolitical climate of BLACK LIVES MATTER, when Black Americans are their own worst enemy from a statiscal standpoint which, for some reason, is never shown on mainstream news outlets (hint: most news outlets are liberal self righteous shitholes, and any that are not exist simply as a contrarian foil to the former).

It stole the title of a great and important film in history in a sort of reclamation process for blacks and is skewing that perception to meet the current political agenda of indignantly misinformed leftist cuckoldry for a problem that is indeed systemic, but mostly due to their own communities and self treatment of themselves therein, rather than whitey keeping them down.

But the real reason I'm going to be mad is the /his/fag in me is going to see that they are going to treat him as some kind of savior, when all he did was incite a riot that got him and a bunch of innocent civilians killed and worsened race relations. Oh, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the birth of a nation, it's just taking white nationalist propaganda (albeit important white nationalist propaganda in the history of film) and making it black propaganda instead.

I've never seen anyone say that Islamic terrorism is justified because of what Christians did during the crusades.

>Birth of a Nation wasn't even big-budget for its time
Name a movie with a bigger budget from 1916. Go on, I'm waiting.

Knowing that this exists bothers me. Has anybody in this thread actually seen Birth of A Nation? It's not white nationalist propaganda bix nood kill blackey, it's about the civil war. D.W. Griffith's views look incredibly outdated by today's standards but for the time he was on the cutting edge of progressiveness. He hired actual black people to be in his movie in minor parts and went out of his way to show that they're just people like everyone else in the movie and that circumstances were driving the country to violence.

Griffith's movie could honestly do a lot more good than this crap for America right now. Griffith made a movie about fraternity and tolerance but this movie feels like a deliberate attempt to divide and aggravate people.

And that's not even to mention that Birth of A Nation is easily one of the best movies ever made. Even now it's impressive. This on the other hand looks uninspired as all hell.

*1915
My bad.

>this much strawman

Yeah lad, it's not about race baiting and historical revisionism, it's just butthurt stormfags.

You're a nigger.

Nice try, Milosevic.

>13% blacks
>60% whites
>implying it wouldn't help

Case in point.

What did they mean by this=

>D.W. Griffith's views look incredibly outdated by today's standards but for the time he was on the cutting edge of progressiveness
what the fuck are you talking about. there were mass protests and boycotts at the time of release

Help with what? Further shitting things up?

> taxes paid for a replacement car

Thanks niggers!