Which was better? The 60's Lolita or The 90's Lolita

Which was better? The 60's Lolita or The 90's Lolita.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/pYbNpamv5Dg
youtu.be/zlUF_hJbUE4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Russian lolita

the book desu

Which one is the lolita in this?

As a movie, the original.

As fap material, the remake.

Haven't read the book. This is Sup Forums.

90s

Agreed. Truer to the story.

Even worst, that shit is in Slavo.

nice pick haha

Which one's hotter? That one.

I'd say both are equally good, but the 60's one is overrated and the 90's one is underrated.

this 60's one is not overrated. it's barely ever mentioned-- but better than Dr. Strangelove which faggots always take to.

60s one is pretty good if you're not autistic about the source material

As far as Kubrick goes it's one of his lesser works but still not bad

They made Lolita a conniving bitch in it though

>Lolita is better than Strangelove

( y o u )

Why are Jeremy Irons and James Woods so damn awesome?

No it's not you, lying sack of shit. Kubrick's is true to the book, which is a black comedy. 90's version is shit.

Nice trips. Anyways, the Kubrick one isn't true to the book. The censorship made it impossible to accurately portray the Lolita and Humberts relationship. The 90's version did that perfectly.

pfffsshhhh HAHAHA. this. so much.

worth the read?

I fapped so hard to that one.

For OP, the original was too heavily censored to be good.

Lolita (2017)
Starring with Lexee


WHEN? WHEN?

does this lexee have nice feet?
if they are going to do a reboot
the girl has to be an acclaimed footslut to pull of those scenes where she teases

Of course, she is, faggit.

>Feetfag

Nigga, please leave

sue lyon was cuter tho

>he hasn't read the book or seen the movies
your opinion is invalid, fag

those feet are too lewd

Hated Kubrick. Watched Lyne's just yesterday for the first time. Really amazing. Kubrick's actress was a fucking roastie not a nymphet.

The one in my basement

...

This was cast by a real pedo

...

1962 Lolita was hampered by Hays code and one of the few instances where Kubrick meddling with the script didn't do the movie a lot of favors.

1997 Lolita was closer to the source but ultimately lacked finesse.

Read the book, watch the 60s version for curiosities sake. No adaptation does the source justice.

anything is better than a kubflick

Didn't look like Lolita though. Looks-wise, Swain was a really good choice, even though she looked a tad too old (albeit being only 15 during the time of filming)

I get they couldn't cast someone much younger than 16 or 17, but surely they could have found a 17 year old girl who looked more childish. much closer to the 12-y.o. in the book?

>ultimately lacked finesse.

And humour! At least in the regard Kubrick's version fared better.

The one in the middle.

You could find an adult that looks 12

90s version has Frank Langela's cock swinging left and right on camera when he's running away from Humbert while his robe was untied.

the first one has 30 minutes of peter sellers doing maybe the worst comedy characters capture on film

While the overall portrayal of Quilty isn't THAT bad, Sellers was actually ill-suited to the role.
Also Kubrick's version is too much "in yer face" at some points while leaving out the "NO FUCKIN WAY" when it'd be necessary.

youtu.be/pYbNpamv5Dg

Superior telling

...

>As fap material, the remake.
Except if you're a footfag. Kubrick's adaptation panders to footfags like not even a Tarantino movie would.
Guess it's all due to the Hays code.
youtu.be/zlUF_hJbUE4

Im so glad that Monroe hardcore scene was finally released

...

The problem with the 90s version is that it isn't funny.

The book is serious but it's also really funny.

Haven't seen the 60s version so I can't comment

who or what is that?

Damn, you my sister from another mister

see:
The humour is THERE but often in a somewhat heavy-handed manner.

...

>They made Lolita a conniving bitch in it though

But that's what she is... if you "BELIEVE" Humbert's account, that is.

sellers was kubrick's personal god, and that's why those scenes go on forever for no other reason. when they were filming strangelove, kubrick was literally rolling on the floor, laughing

Why would you cast a porn starlet as Lolita? That's just stupid.

>Lolita starring Siberian Mouse or Cat Goddess.

make it happen.

Katerina Kozlova AKA Monroe

You have fapping to do

>Katerina Kozlova
The tennis player?
Doesn't look at all like her. I think you're pulling my leg here, good sir.

>Im so glad that Monroe hardcore scene was finally released

You wot mate ! Give me some sauce.

i-is this legal?

Good movie??

The Irons version doesn't quite capture the duplicitous nature of Humbert and makes him a bit too much a straight tragical figure who is likable and easy to fool. In the book it's more ambiguous and uncertain how much of the story is true and what is just Humbert attempting to deceive you.

Irons is more or less portraying HH as characterised by HH.

Of course. You know that everything coming out of Russia needs to be officially sanctioned by Vlad himself.

looks illegal. No fap on my side.

good for 90s nostalgia if you were born in the 80s and had your first fap on Aerosmith's "Crazy" video.

All these normies that don't realize dd/lg relationships with actual teenage girls and middled aged men are a real thing and more common than they think.

I couldn't watch the 60's version, it just seemed like some asinine movie that had the same character names as the book. 90's Dolly at least pretended to not be too old.

I'd love a version with a real nymphet but it will never happen.

WEW LAD THE FILM

We need to bring back the seventies, I guess.

I think the issue with filming Lolita is that the book, because of the way it's written and how selective it is in its descriptions, is not pornographic. A film inevitably has to be, because you can't "hide" things on camera like you can in text.

>A film inevitably has to be, because you can't "hide" things on camera like you can in text.
Are you fucking kidding, there are many ways to 'imply' something within scenes with actors, that's called acting ffs

she's in her 30's.
seriously.

I don't understand why normalfags like to say that Lolita isn't a book for pedophiles. I couldn't stop laughing during Humbert's ranting in chapter 5 because it was just so relatable.

Is she, like, the Russian Emily Kinney or something?

Anime adaptation when?

those same normies say leon is a pedo flick
i don't get it

Why are people saying Kubrick's isn't faithful enough to the book? The biggest biggest difference I can think of is the way Quilty was handled throughout the story

Wait, why did you laugh if it was relatable?

Doesn't feel the same

I disagree then I guess, I've read the book a while after seeing the movie and I had no such feeling

On empornium. If you don't have an account, how are you even on Sup Forums.

Peter Sellers ruined the first one

That's some bullshit male fantasy. Most virgins can insert a tampon with an applicator without trouble

>Kodomo no Jikan
>bullshit male fantasy

You don't say?

How does Nabokov even portray those feelings so accurately without being one himself ? Its a fucking amazing book.

It's funny to hear someone articulate things you've always bought but never said. It's like Seinfeld.

written by a woman

I've always have considered 90's version far better

link ?

Look at the fucking filename, you can't find it with all that there?

Literally everyone has wanted to fuck a 12-17 year old at some point in their life, it's human nature

>Russkaya
>Lolita
i don't want the cop at my door
seriously there is no available link, torent are dead, pls make a mega link if you have it

TOR that shit, you fuckhead.

yeah sure. I call bullshit.

...

russian lolita is just called a 'romantic movie' also dominic swain has aged like milk

Fuck off. Dominic Swain is a cool guy.
Dominique Swain has aged like milk though.

>TOR that shit
Why? Is a porno you dumb fucker is legal all over the world.

What the fuck is she even doing?

Reading a magazine