Has Human evolution ended?

Has Human evolution ended?

Darwin stated that evolution is driven by natural selection for mutations that favor survivability in the brutal competitive battleground that was the natural world. Humans have mostly tamed this brutality to the point where our worries arent surviving against lions or disease anymore.

I think that we have stopped evolving in the classical sense.

Other urls found in this thread:

statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html
lmgtfy.com/?q=government website for welfare race statistics
sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/humans-are-still-evolving-and-we-can-watch-it-happen
bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=RC-Cqkq6zWc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no

No such thing as evolution you stupid yuro cuck

Pretty much Evolution is adaptation. We still keep changing as the world changes. Because of how much we are modernizing and changing the world with out pollution there will come children immune to cancer and all that other shit that keep killing us off.

yes

i can't observe anything beyond my tiny postmodern world so everything has probablyt ended a million years ago too

the romans were degnerates

what a naive assertion

You misunderstand what scientific theory is. As a definition I mean.

Natural selection is still around to weed out some kids. Beyond that our adaption is sufficient enough to overcome natural selection.

It's even better than that as we will soon decide our offspring, and not mother nature.

The real question is will we become too great and end up destroying ourselves? A solution for Fermi's paradox suggests life does exist elsewhere, yet it's exponentially difficult to evolve past a certain level-known as the Great Barrier.

It's most likely this barrier is ahead of us, so I'd say we probably will self destruct

Nuclear war might change things.

No the environment now poses its own unique challenges, and evolution is such a long process that the last 100 years is barely a blip on the radar

Technology will evolve faster that biological adaptation, the next human evolution will be engineered not natural.

intellectually, humans are devolving, already. in 1921, the average IQ was 11 points higher, per person (in the US anyhow). They're literally getting dumber.

physically, yes, we have new challenges like obesity, pollution, and addtives in food.

hopefully.

I wonder why the average test scores in a country that is becoming less white are getting lower hmmm.

...

the world's becoming less white. not just the US. but the US is dumber than any developing country.

however -- explain why the largest group on welfare in America are whites in Red States (and not whites in Blue States).... that's an interesting one.

americans are not the whole world u retarded fucknigger. only because u brainwashed jewslaves are becoming dumber doesnt mean the rest of the world is. get your shit together tyrone

Yes, human evolution has stopped. Everyone I've ever told this to has disagreed with me, but I think it's because they have some kind of emotional attachment to the idea that this is not our final form, and not because they have any reason to.

Survival of the fittest no longer applies to us. Virtually anyone in the civilized world can survive to adulthood and have kids, no matter how fat, lazy, unhealthy, and incompetent. In some cases you can even have kids if you are born sterile, thanks to modern medicine. Cooperation has replaced competition for us. We don't let each other fail. It's true that many humans do not currently live in the 'civilized' world, but they will be brought up to our current standards on a timescale that's insignificant from an evolutionary standpoint.

It's also true that there are some selection pressures still in play. Various traits do make you more likely to have lots of children in the modern world. These pressures are insignificant compared to survival of the fittest in a competitive environment, though, and are drowned out by "free will", for lack of a better term. Humans have arrived at a point where our psychological complexity means that we often have higher priorities than reproducing, and just because a person is capable of having lots of kids usually does not mean that they do. Additionally, genetic fitness is pretty low on most people's list of priorities when choosing a mate.

Basically, we don't compete with each other for the resources that we need to survive and reproduce (we do compete with each other for resources in some ways, but by and large the losers of that competition still do fine from an evolutionary standpoint), and we constantly make decisions that work against the interests of our genetic lineage. How many kids you have has much more to do with the random circumstances of your life than it has to do with your genes, and what few selection pressures do still exist are drowned out in the randomness of it all.

Probably because all the smart people are behaving smartly. Waiting until they are financially settled before having a sensible / affordable two kids at 30.

Meanwhile billybob and diane had 3 kids at her 21st.

Idiocracy is very real

cancer happens when a mistake is made in duplicating the DNA, there are about 120 000 mistakes each time a cell replicates but we have system that can correct the mistakes, i do not see how evolution can help this unless we evolve to be immortal which would mean we would get simpler(most lesser animals,plants fungi and others live longer than the more complicated species and some are biologically speaking immortal) and evolution is about a organism getting more complicated over time to adapt to changes, the shit that is killing us off is the failing of the cell to reproduce an exact copy of it's mother cell, bacteria and viruses will also evolve over time and humans as organic beings will always have to die

then of course you'll have to explain black men like Neil Degrasse-Tyson, with IQ's well over 200.

statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

wrong

We pretty much have stopped evolving. Now anyone can live, reproduce and affect the world, for better or worse

Pic unrelated

Becoming a forever lost, empty rock of nothing in space.

Here


To say all of one race is stupid because its not all nature but nurture does take part in how someone grows. To deny nature is foolish as much as denying nurture. There will always be outliers. It is a curve

atheism and watching anime are symptoms of mental retardation

The U.S. is "dumber" than most of the developed world because it a shitty education system. That's legislation, not genetics. Those laws and that system, like the demographics of the red states, are an accident of history, not the result of humans having spent a few hundred years evolving a lack of math skills.

because businesses for the majority have abandoned the center of the counter in favor of high pop locales they can monopolize on, the more business leaves low pop areas the less sustainability they have

>has evolution ended
>implying evolution = natural selection
>implying evolutions ends
no retard, even when natural selection does not occur we are still evolving. we are evolving to have less muscle mass and body hair in general

Evolution never stops, its daily occurrence. Also Evolution is still a theory. It hasn't fully entered the realms of everyday observation to see its path. Next step is Homo-Ludens.(which we are currently in)

mfw when this is exactly the perfect exemple of a black man adapting to a white-dominant society.

prove climate change. you can't

prove evolution. you can't.

and... for fun. prove the world's round. you can't.

Also, I would like to note that if we did not subsidize these low intelligence people through welfare your "sensible" people could be reproducing at a much younger age.

No, it hasn't. Recent genetic studies show that evolution is still happening both century-wise and millennium-wise.
A couple of UK-centric examples: population genetic analysis shows that height and lighter skin have been preferentially selected during the last two millennia. Also, a gene expressing a nicotine receptor which relates to difficulty with quitting smoking has been selected against in the 50s when smoking was much more widespread than today. Currently, selection against that gene seems to have slowed down noticeably.

>statisticbrain

you might as well post breitbart as a source

>KEK!

nope.

prove you're not an idiot

Lol yes i know? What you trying to get at?

How do you respond to this?

Pic related. It is from the US Gov

/thread

Shit is always in a state of constant change.

that until evolution's proven, it's not a fact. indeed, nor are climate change or even the round earth theory.

statisticbrain is your source you imbecile, it's for entertainment purposes only

post a .gov source.

or be silent you fool. the onus is now on you to PROVE IT. I've got you in my sights, you buffoon.

Evolution is random. We are not evolving into a more perfect form.

i never said it was fact!!! i said its still a theory, read what i fucking wrote you complete and utter dribbling retard

Nah. Mutations are random. Evolution tends towards improvements in survivability.

Individuals mutate, populations evolve.

Firstly, the factors that will have stopped our evolution have only come into play within the last few hundred years, so the fact the there has been a bit of drifting within the last few thousand is irrelevant.

Secondly, there will always be some slight drift, but the end result will never be anything that's substantially different, because the drift is random and the type of evolution we've seen over the last several hundred thousand years requires selection forces that are powerful enough to consistently move things along in a particular direction for a long time. Nicotine is some debris bouncing off of the side of our boat, not a current.

census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html

Evolution has been proven since the 17th century, way before Darwin and Wallace's theory was published.
It is the name given to a phenomenon. Namely: strata of different ages contain different fossil species and older strata contain simpler life forms than newer ones.
Evolutionary theory is a model that explains how this phenomenon happens (quite well, which it is called a theory).

Yes. Humans used to evolve to adapt to their surroundings but now we just change our surroundings to suit us
/thread

lmgtfy.com/?q=government website for welfare race statistics

I am sure you prefer the completely un-sourced assertion still huh?

I guess you missed the part about intra-century evolutionary pressures. You may want to read sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/humans-are-still-evolving-and-we-can-watch-it-happen to get an overview.
You may want to read about kuru and the mutation it has selected in Fore tribes.

you idiot you made this.

2015
>press release

KEK

NEWP.

No, just look at all the thin people who evolved into fat asses!!
BTFO, OP!!

no, EVOLUTION IS NOT A FACT!

my god man, have you even gone to university yet?

I made all those .gov websites like
?

Do you have a problem with the United States Census Bureau?

Human evolution hasn't ended, lately it has been manipulated through technological means. one thing that is changing somewhat rapidly is the size of newborn babies skulls. in the past without medical intervention such births would not be successful and would likely result in the death of both the mother and child. now those births can continue thanks to c-sections and modern medicine. as this continues and those large headed baby genes don't die out we will soon be a society that will struggle to reproduce without increasing medical and technological help. we cut out some of the natural selection but those evolutionary changes still occur , they just aren't always positive adaptations

If you go down that road, nor is gravity.

Hope you dont float away the next time you go outside. Better buy a long chain just in case?

there's not even a listed SOURCE on that adobe document you've just posted.

tbh your racism and hatred are making you stupid. if you weren't already stupid to begin with.

in fact racists do tend to have lower iq's...

think about that, RACIST.

But evolution is a fact. You may be confusing it with evolutionary theory

You know you can just type in the title of the picture on that taskbar above you and get it right?

bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf

This is the United States Bureau of Justice Statistics


Nice argument. To say all of one group in a large sample is one thing is stupid

gentlemen, do you think gay homosexuals are a product of evolution? or a mistake?

are they a check for population overgrowth?

what purpose does the known homosexual serve?

Radical christian fundamentalist here.. Evolution is fake. The world is here because God thought about the earth and the animals and humans popped in one-by-one (in the processes of 7days) when he imagined it. Then he said It is good. Also God saved me from cardiac arrest i just asked him to make it stop and then he stopped it!! When i got to the hospital the doctors were like I'm gonna die and shit! but I smiled and said praise jesus amen halelugah body of christ! and it went away! amazing! and i went bankrupt too and allova sudeen my chruch game me a check for 1 million dollars whoooo!! thank you jesus!!!

Here, have a read friendo

>sciencemag
I don't particularly want to read that, as it happens. And I addressed your claim about intra-century pressures, plain as day.

Your argument seems to be that because there is drift, we'll be somewhere different in a million years. What I am saying is that that is not necessarily true, not that there is no drift.

Yes. We haven't stopped evolution though, we have only made the tolerance bigger. Genetics that would have perished in the harsh environments of the past are now allowed to live. The result is a mongrelization and degeneration of the human species as a whole, but especially of the white race, because it is by far the most advanced.

This unhealthy trend will lead to extinction, unless stopped by racial hygiene and an artificial selection of the best genes (like the National Socialists in Germany 1933-1945 tried to establish). Racial health and genetic selection will become an issue again in the future, after having been demonized for the past 100 years.

"Human Accomplishment" that's a hack book and you know that right?

Well you're a racist. And Ivy League studies have shown that racists do indeed tend to have remarkably low IQ's.

Indeed they've also shown that politically right-winged minds have lower IQ's than their left-leaning counterparts.

Evolution is BS .. we burn in the sun ... We are enginerd

Wrong.
We just generate our own threats.
Pollution, war, massive screen watching.
All of this will make some selection

tl;dr.

Genetic drift is part of evolution. So, your objections notwithstanding, yes, evolution is still happening.
Another example is selection against excessive infant head size (which has also been mentioned in other comments): C-section has become instrumental in reducing that selective pressure.

Same ivy league schools that are allowing and supporting this kind of rhetoric?

youtube.com/watch?v=RC-Cqkq6zWc

Most colleges are leftist indoctrination camps and people are waking up to that.

Also classy picture I am glad you believe so little in your own logic you have to post disturbing photos like a child to feel better. I have been on the internet a long time you are not going to disturb me.

Is it? I have not looked into that one specifically I have been meaning to. I just posted a random picture in my file. I will check into it; thanks buddy always;looking to know if things I have are incorrect.

Battleground just changed. We are now more than ever social creatures.

I'd prefer the Lions personally.

Also, I can't take your assertions seriously if you reject contradicting information because "you don't feel like reading it".

oh god we've found the retard

>"leftist indoctrination camps!"

done. you're blocked. don't bother responding boy, I won't be able to see your posts from now on.

You're mistaking evolution for epigenetics.

tl;dr version is pure homosexuality has no philosophical right to exist any way you look at it. Atleast it was kind of justifiable as an act back in the day when men would still enter into marriage contracts with women to raise kids while being gay. Today being pure gay is completely contrary any way you look at it to life.

humans have always had a massive social component.

although i do agree about the lions...

it's interesting how canines have helped us evolve, isn't it (and vice versa).

Keep screaming racist in all your debates sweetie. Your side is losing out because of that kind of arguing. It only makes me happier and happier when I see people like you.

should gay homosexuals be eliminated?

surely they were MEANT to serve some purpose (I still think to keep population in check)

Yes, the social component has always been a factor. However, today, the ability to pass on your genes is more connected to social status than anything else.

ah quite so.

I don't believe "eliminating" is necessary. Just stop promoting it and let it return to being looked down on because of it being an aberration from the normal straight people who sustain the country through family units. Homosexuality is usually tied to many ailments and tend to do a terrible time raising kids. They are statistically more likely to abuse children when they adopt.

I don't believe they are meant to have a purpose. Think of the theory of macro-evolution. There are many mutations IE changes from the norm but most are detrimental rather than beneficial. Detrimental things should not be promoted or accepted or you will become weaker as a whole.

Genetic drift is "part of evolution" in that it is a mechanism by which a gene pool can change over time. If your argument is that the gene pool will continue to change, then fine, yes it will, but that's a silly and pedantic argument to be making in this context.

How far back in time would you have to go to find a human ancestor that is recognizably inhuman. 300,000 years? What do you think you will see if you go 3 million years into the future? Let's assume that we haven't driven ourselves extinct or or radically altered ourselves in some kind of transhumanist movement. It'll be humans. It'll be humans because those selection forces that are still acting on us (and yes, there are some, I said it in my first post), are completely insignificant compared to the ones that made us what we are. Will every single gene variant exist with exactly the same frequency that it has today? No. Does that mean we will ever be the ancestor of a species that distinct from us in any important way? No it does not.

I don't know why anyone should take your assertions seriously when your argument is "I read it in a magazine, so it must be true".

No it hasn't, natural selection != evolution. Humans are still evolving through genetic drift.

You are particularly ignorant, evolution isn't directional, and your sources are bullshite anyway

Evolution never existed.

BS women are told from a young age that they should find a tall dark handsome stranger to marry
so in other words no one short

Is your argument based upon the qualifier of the out of Africa theory? It seems to me in this post
Where you say the last few thousand years seems to imply that.

There is substantial evidence that African centrist evolution is incorrect and we have been separated for long periods of time. Otherwise if you still believe in African centrist theory anyways you have to take into account the vast differences in biology between the races that have happened within the last thousand years, I would not call that irrelevant.

Between the races our bones are different as an example.

Neil Degrasse-Tyson is what we call an outlier.

Short man detected.

Silly and pedantic because you say so when it is actually fundamental to evolution. Biologists do not consider it silly. Medical researchers do not consider it silly. You may want to get up to date: evolutionary theory has advanced quite a bit since the 19th century.
Also, I mentioned Science Magazine because it references the studies it bases its overview on. But it is simpler to dismiss it without even looking at it

Arguing about racial intelligence is dumb and I've got nothing to prove, but I have never seen any evidence that Neil Degrasse-Tyson is anywhere near that smart. You only have to be at about 125 to excel in the more difficult STEM fields (e.g. physics), and the fact that he is so personable is evidence that he is nearer to that than farther, since most people with abnormally high IQs are weirdos.

I will say one thing. We as humans have done some awesome an crazy things to our environment. Even without any humans left on this planet, we've done so much to change the course of evolution. Like with every new type of plastic we make, some bacteria will evolve to eat it. So whatever happens to life on this planet, we will have been like gods. Shaping their creation. So millions of years from now, something may be looking to your fossils for answers on their evolution. or not, and God is just laughing while we burn in hell as non-believers

>believes evolution happens in a short enough timespan for us to notice change
You're a faggot, OP.

>immune to cancer
No, cancer is a normal process to kill off old organisms. You can't grow immune to cancer.

Neil Degrasse-Tyson is a meme scientist little better than Bill "I have an associates in engineering and I was on a kids show" Nye the science guy. He has not published or pier reviewed a paper in 20 years

I just think that the world population is too high. We are overdue for another world war or some genocides at least. So, along those lines, I think that once the population grows to levels well beyond what the planet can sustain, competition for nonrenewable resources will be the new natural selection. A society which loses this competition will become subject to a society which has won. This is why even though the Middle East is rich with oil, the United States always seems to be doing whatever it can to control the oil supplies. This is also why the house of Saud and the United States have very close relations.

WRONG

Evolution is the change in the allele frequence of a population. Because niggers are shitting out their niglets like crazy, the allele frequence of the human population (due to globalisation there's essentially just one population) does indeed change - towards a more nigger-like one.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii

never say can't