Syrian population- 22.85 million

Syrian population- 22.85 million
Iraq population- 33.42 million
Libya population- 6.2 million
Yemen population- 24.41 million
Sudan population- 37.96 million
Somalia population- 10.5 million
Iran population- 77.45 million

Assuming EVERY person in EVERY one of these countries is muslim (which is not true) that would mean:

212.79 million / 1.6 billion =

13% of muslims worldwide AT ABSOLUTE BEST cannot travel to the US

Nearly 90% of all muslims are still free to come and go as they please.

How is this a "muslim ban" again exactly?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#National_Socialist_attitudes_towards_Christianity
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because it is not? Its just liberal media BS...

Trump and Spicer both called it a ban.

They used the word ban.

Yeah but if I call the sky a chair, does that make the sky a chair?

Of course not. It's still the sky.

and the ban is not on Muslims specially it on people who live there, and there are nations with a shit ton of Muslims not on the list, nations that just happen to not be loaded full of extremists hellbent on killing us...

big fucking differance

das rayciss talk.

Tell that to the man who has said he wants a Muslim ban and keeps talking about how Christianity is in danger

It's pretty clear what it is

You faggots had better get right with God if you know what's good for you.

>differance
deconstructivist detected

why's that?

Which one?

Christianity/Islam has no place in a civilized world. There should be a travel ban on all of them.

sorry but you are wrong. Read the order. It makes exceptions for minority religions. So it is absolutely a Muslim ban.

how many die in the name of Christianity nowaday? how many kill for Christianity?

the numbers for islam is quite high
i rest my case

It's not a muslim ban. It's a ban aimed at countries known for being terrorists shitholes that often disguise as refugees.

Of course the MSM shilled against him so they're exaggerating things.

>How is this a "muslim ban" again exactly?

It's the laziest label the morons can agree on.

That's another lazy lie. If you'd actually READ the order (which you obviously did not, or are too stupid to understand it), it says that *after* the ban expires, people being religiously persecuted receive accelerated consideration for refugee status.

Until the ban expires, Christians from Iraq are kept out and Muslims from Turkey are not. It is not a "Muslim ban." You're a moron.

it's true Christianity has been pacified a bit since they killed the Jews in the holocaust, but it wouldn't take much for them to go back to their old ways. The mental damage is the same regardless if they worship God through Christianity or Islam.

Post a source that says the holocaust was a christian-based offensive against the jews. I really don't believe this but I'm willing to look at any facts you may or may not have.

The assault on Christians by ISIS is very clearly a muslim-based offensive as Islam is literally in the name of their group

It's a false equivalency and you are wrong.

You wouldn't be a shill would you?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#National_Socialist_attitudes_towards_Christianity

Nazi germany (leadership at least) was obsessed with the occult and satanism, hence the often weird and unnecessary medical experiments. To call it a Christian-based offensive is literally a false equivalency.

Those Christians are usually given the option to convert. Their death is a result of their own stubbornness and stupidity.

The Nazi's would have never been in positions of authority without exploiting the antisemitism of the German population.

So you support using violence against religious freedom and blame the victims when it happens?

Ok, sounds pretty tolerant to me.

How do you defend them killing them even AFTER they convert (which is a fairly regular occurrence as well)?