Where do you stand Sup Forumsros?

Where do you stand Sup Forumsros?

not completely retarded like you

That test is garbage with leading questions.

There are better tests with that same chart being used.

I'm center, 3/4 to the bottom. A hybrid of socialism and capitalism is ideal and liberty is extremely important.

We won't like each other op

My result, I would consider myself to be more libertarian though.

...

mah

nigga

[spoiler]i'm black[/spoiler]

ama.....
how tho... i would vote trum if i lived in the us tho
and id be 2nd amendment gun nut con but heeeyyy.... this chart is bs

lol ...im like literally ghandi

...

the fuck outa here

Trump is much more leftist than people like to admit. Anti- TPP, pro-worker, against lobbyists, calls out wall street regularly, him and Sanders have a lot in common tbh, probably why I don't hate him.

It's just an inconvenient truth to liberals.

best quadrant

...

...

yeah thinking about that, your right....
hes basicly the best of both worlds, he uses comon fucking sense and hes pretty much anti fucking shill establishment

congratulate yourself harder
you certainly are representative of your ilk

5 left, 3 down.

...

...

Comrade?

>Common sense.
>Wants to build a wall.
Neck yourself.

...

Right here

Pick a side fagot.

ou hell no what a shame he wants to stop folks from illegaly immigrating into your country yeah makes 0 sense

>it's a "large concrete walls don't hinder mass movement" liberal. Tell me, what surrounds your local Federal prison?

Agreed.

Hahaha

I drive by the facility in Concord surrounded by 20 foot concrete walls and I wonder why they would use those. Why can't they just use liberal idealism to restrict movement of undesirables?

This except two squares up. I am not an sjw, nor am I a some sort of devout commie. I just do not give a shit, and want neetbux.

I like ideas from both parties, I also think both parties have fucking retarded ideas too.
I voted for Harambe.

All of you purps are either retarded or just need the silver sp00n out of your mouths for a while.
And you authoritarifags are either memesters or evangelical nazis who are into astrology. Either way you're
too edgy for me.

eh bro you're a little too far into idealism territory.

a couple sane, rational adults here.

Seems about right.

...

Here son

LOL, centrism is irrationality by definition. A centrist either has no philosophical principles or refuses to apply them consistently. Since philosophical principles are determined by reason, centrism is irrational. Defined by inconsistency and contradiction.

That's nonsense and I'm not even a centrist. You can have centrist principles that aren't contradictory.

says the liberal edgelord fag...

I am glad I am an authoritarian man since I support an oligarchy where my portfolio grows at the expenses of the meek and less fortunate.

>being pragmatic is irrational
lol.

>silver sp00n

Kinda hard to have that when you were birthed by farmers who couldn't afford the gas it takes to make it to the nearest hospital. Do tell me how I'm retarded though, because your political peers are so smart that their theories have never been successfully implemented into any civilization ever.

Yeah that one is alright. Tell me when you're done reading it

Anarcho-Capitalist here.

here's how you're retarded: your parents were farmers. that's about as dumb as trying to be an actor.

What do you do for a living?

Not an argument. You either believe in property rights or you don't. The principles that protect the right to own your body and mind as property extend to physical property like home and businesses. If you believe that you have the right to smoke weed but not the right to keep your property without threats of force or coercion, you're a hypocrite.

Mechanical engineer.

So progressive and free-thinking

I am a SnacksMoot fag, aka bottom left freedom lover.

It's the chinamen who have turned you all into nazi suckup fags.

You have killed /b, been socially engineered by chinamen, and made every day the same set of threads.

Learn to use your right brain, authoritarian faggos

Not evangelical, but I am a National Socialist. Christianity is a weak religion. As the Fuhrer himself said:
“Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers—already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity!—then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.” –Hitler’s Table Talk, pg 667

How did i do?

My nigga

lol no.

>freedom lover
Except if you want to be productive or own property. Then your freedoms end, right? Idiot.

Did Christianity prevent him from victory, too?

niggerfaggot

>I don't have an argument

No, things aren't that simple. You are simple minded and need to put things into overly simplified categories.

Principles are clearly defined by reason. Also, not an argument.

Come up with something less stupid so he and I can take it seriously.

here OP

No, how about you just address it as is? This is why political discourse is never advanced in any medium now, one side or another gets butthurt or flustered and just drops the whole fucking plate.

Welcome to pragmatism

Come up with one yourself so it can have a rebuttal. You drastically oversimplified complex ideas and expected people to follow along seriously.

Again, not an argument.

>never been implemented
Every policy I support has been successful implemented somewhere. If you think a more Laissez-faire sided capitalism works then you should at least give U.S. history a little studying. But if you like being dirt poor and vote to keep it that way then I can't really argue with you. I hope you find a real job someday user

Everything is a spectrum, you're being too absolutist about these things. Until you accept that, no one can have a real discussion with you.

...

my nigga

I gave you an argument, and you refuse to engage it. I'll make it simple so even you can see it
ARGUMENT: Property rights are derived from the human capacity to use reason and the ability to own body and mind. Because human beings own their bodies and minds, they're capable of owning property, by definition, because both of these things are property. Things derived from property, like labor and the products of labor, are protected by the same principles. Thus, human beings morally can trade property with one another voluntarily, and all consequences of this are moral and protected by the principles of property rights. The right to body and mind are fundamentally the same as the right to property, thus the "libertarian" left is a contradiction, as it only allows for one of these.

For example "you either believe in property rights or you don't" as you're presenting it is a drastic oversimplification of the issues at hand. You need to accept that in order to have any kind of meaningful discussion.

Kek you wish. Have fun flipping patties after you get through college

...

>I hope you find a real job someday user

Me too. I don't know what I do with these concrete finishing tools all day, I guess I just like playing with them.

What juncture in US history did allowing the market more freedom cause more harm than good?

You're still being an absolutist.

>everything is a spectrum
You're on a spectrum all right. And the statement that "everything is a spectrum" IS a statement of absolutism. "everything" and "is" are both statements of absolutes. You've already contradicted yourself, and you haven't even made a coherent argument yet.

Everything is on a spectrum is not a contradictory statement, despite your desire to label it as one. No I'm not autistic. Frankly I'm one of the most normal people on Sup Forums.

Absolutism is the only consistent way to view reality. Is reality real? Does existence exist? If yes, welcome to the world of rational thought. Even babies can understand object permanence after age 2. Why can't you?

"Everything" and "is". Both of these are statement of an absolute. Thus, they can't be on a spectrum. Can yes be no?

>Frankly I'm one of the most normal people on Sup Forums

Well good god, isn't that just an amazing feat to have tucked under your belt?

Why do you think object permanence gives you free reign to make black and white political statements about abstract concepts.

Isn't it amazing that you focused on that instead of my actual point.

...

Uhh...you mad bro? I'm 27 and have been working for a company for 6 years in the Automation industry.

I don't care about your actual point, I'm not in this argument. You said a funny thing and I made note of it.

...

I already explained why. And you haven't made a point. All you've said is "nothing is certain" and haven't qualified it with any evidence or reasoning.

Honestly your attempt to link human ability to understand that physical objects are still there when not in sight with refusing to understand that political affiliation is a spectrum reeks of underclassmen college idealism.

USA

You do realize you haven't actually addressed a single argument right? You've just said "nuh-uh".

Close to Gandhi

You linked two college underclassmen concepts with the typical "I understand the universe" attitude of a college underclassman.

I never said nothing is certain, you misunderstand me. I'm just saying that political affiliation is complexed and nuanced. Making black and white assumptions is ridiculous and shows an inability to understand the complexity at hand. Listen man I know you're not dumb, you don't need to keep trying to showcase that. Just argue your points.

If you down a shot of bleach, you'll be even closer to Gandhi.

All you've done is refuse to understand nuance in political affiliation.That's where you've gone wrong, and that's what I'm addressing.

...

So lets stop talking in circles, what's flawed about being centrist? Be concise.

lol no.

Chaotic good faggot.