Tfw you realize after all this time that it's democrats and liberals that are the real fascists

>tfw you realize after all this time that it's democrats and liberals that are the real fascists

Basic Tenets of Fascism:

>"Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong.

Democrats: You don't want to sell a cake to a gay couple because of your religion? We're going to tell you you have to or close your business.

Democrats: You don't want to perform gay marriage in your church because your religious beliefs don't agree with it? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/church.

Democrats: Don't want to pay for contraception/abortions for your employees because your deeply-held religious beliefs disagree with the murder of unborn children? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/charity.


>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.
Democrats: Bigger government, more control of individual lives, more taxation. We can spend your money better than you can.

Democrats: Don't want/need to buy this product? We'll force you to buy it or we'll penalize you a few hundred/thousand dollars every year until you do.

Republicans: Smaller government, states rights, less taxation.

How do you explain this, lefties? Why do you use the label "fascist" to slander republicans when it seems it lines up more with your own ideology?

Other urls found in this thread:

abc7ny.com/news/nypd-muslim-woman-lied-about-attack-on-subway/1656487/
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/paul-jones-trump-supporter-shot-at-cleveland-bar-d/
downtrend.com/71superb/crazy-liberal-kills-ups-driver-thinking-it-was-donald-trump
theblaze.com/news/2016/11/20/gang-of-four-who-brutally-beat-trump-supporter-in-chicago-is-about-to-receive-justice/
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/01/06/facebook-live-attack-chicago-suspects-in-court/
cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/01/23/sean-spicer-press-briefing-inauguration-viewership-sot.cnn
wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/27/veri-j27.html
rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens
rasmussenreports.com/
cbsnews.com/news/americans-sharply-divided-along-partisan-lines-over-travel-ban-trump-cbs-news-poll/
google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/21/white-trump-protester-sucker-punched-by-black-trump-supporter-in-brutal-video-of-tucson-rally/
google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/03/10/politics/donald-trump-protestor-punch-face/index.html
youtube.com/watch?v=tytKO3HoRz4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Wow, that's a very skewed view you have. Also a couple of those things are factually wrong (like no one is forcing churches who don't want to perform gay marriage to do so).

It's okay to fight bigotry and intolerance, doing so doesn't make you intolerant.

So it's ok to be fascist if you claim it's "fighting bigotry and intolerance"? Isn't that what the nazis said? How do you explain forcing your agenda on everyone else and quelling any dissenting opinions with physical violence, riots, punching people in the face, and pepper-spraying them when they voice their opinion (Berkeley for example)?

>2017
>still unaware of what fascism means

and im out of here faggot

sure shill

Republicans: Smoke pot. ILLEGAL
Republicans: Anal sex, blow jobs. ILLEGAL
Republicans: Abortions. ILLEGAL
etc

...

this

I laid out my position quite easily in OP. Are you saying liberals can't be fascist when they contain 9 out of 10 characteristics (and the1 they don't posess is simply "hurr durr has to be right wing"?) Doesn't make sense at all and it's a cop out honestly.

If I've got a shoe with every component except laces, it's still a fucking shoe, idiot. The only shill is you.

You've got enough strawmen there to keep a whole farm bird free.

I'm not forcing my agenda on anyone. And it's a load of bullshit to claim that all our protests are violent. Sorry if a fringe decides to get carried away (or even infiltrated, that happens too), but that is certainly not the method of the majority.

It's okay to punch Nazis, seriously those guys aren't up for having a good faith debate, they just want to shit over everyone. They're going to make shit up against us anyway, might as well give them a black eye to whine about about.

By the way, the pepper spraying was done to liberals, not by them.

...

Post a link where he said this.

Shills out hard today.

no, ur just unaware of what fascism means, u uneducated faggot nigger

...

It is never not okay to punch Nazis.

Then why vote one to be your president?

>Our protests aren't violent

Muslim HRC supporter lied and said she was attacked by Trump supporters on a subway, assaulted, and spit on. Later arrested for filing false police reports.

abc7ny.com/news/nypd-muslim-woman-lied-about-attack-on-subway/1656487/

Black man shot at bar for simply saying he supports Trump

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/paul-jones-trump-supporter-shot-at-cleveland-bar-d/

Anti-Trump liberal KILLS UPS driver after mistaking him for Donald Trump

downtrend.com/71superb/crazy-liberal-kills-ups-driver-thinking-it-was-donald-trump

Gang of 4 blacks drag Trump supporter out of his car in daytime traffic and brutally beat him

theblaze.com/news/2016/11/20/gang-of-four-who-brutally-beat-trump-supporter-in-chicago-is-about-to-receive-justice/

Gang of anti-Trump black Chicago residents kidnap handicapped teen, imprison and torture him for 48 hours while streaming it all live on facebook

sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/01/06/facebook-live-attack-chicago-suspects-in-court/

>Sorry if a fringe gets infiltrated

Post any proof that liberals have been "infiltrated" by someone else

>it's okay to punch nazis, they don't want a good debate

Only I'm looking for facts right now in a good debate. Seems you're just calling anyone who disagrees with you a "nazi" to automatically justify punching them in the face (using violence to quiet a dissenting opinion).

>the pepper spray was done to liberals not by them

Oh the girl assaulted on camera was a liberal? The facts are not on your side but keep making things up, pal.

It's probably poorly stated, but you *do* have a right to disagree with facts if you have evidence that suggests said facts are not correct.

Just because something is considered a 'fact' by most of the population doesn't mean it can't be disproven, but disproving something many people believe requires a lot of solid evidence.

I don't know who this guy is or care about American politics, I just wanted to say that.

Here ya go
cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/01/23/sean-spicer-press-briefing-inauguration-viewership-sot.cnn

inb4 CNN left wing media blah blah blah. It's a video of him saying it. The source doesn't matter

see

Democrats: You don't want to sell a cake to a gay couple because of your religion? We're going to tell you you have to or close your business.

This is discrimination, a little different, I see where you're coming from here. No religion prohibits you from completely interacting with homosexuals, so deciding to not sell something to someone based on what they do in the privacy of their own home is peetty at best, but is it ethical for a government to restrict this? The answer is not clear.

Democrats: You don't want to perform gay marriage in your church because your religious beliefs don't agree with it? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/church.

There are people who have tried to sue for this, but this is nothing that any notable figures are pushing for, you have to be weary of this "loud minority" that media likes to focus on. Like pretending that all Trump voters are uneducated hicks, or that all Hillary voters are fat sjw's. It's just not that simple, and a tactic that media uses to de-legitimatize any political opponents.

Democrats: Don't want to pay for contraception/abortions for your employees because your deeply-held religious beliefs disagree with the murder of unborn children? Don't care. Do it or we'll close your business/charity.

I would say this is a much more complex issue.
Imagine that this is a company who is against vaccines or gmo's and refused to pay for something simple like a flu shot for your children.
This last part is pure speculation, but I feel like a lot of this times when this comes up it's more about not wanting to spend money than having any moral obligations against the specific problems.

This is now a bear jew thread.
1. Both political parties are corrupt. Don't forget what the DNCdid during the election, but at least they aren't led by a narcissistic fuck who is setting this country up for failure.

2. Punching Nazi's is always okay. Doesn't anyone remember this from
Indiana Jones?

no u

Not forcing by violence(mostly), but excluding and misrepresenting those views which go against the collective majority view of the western world.

pt 2

>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.
Democrats: Bigger government, more control of individual lives, more taxation. We can spend your money better than you can.

Democrats: Don't want/need to buy this product? We'll force you to buy it or we'll penalize you a few hundred/thousand dollars every year until you do.

Republicans: Smaller government, states rights, less taxation.

If you were saying conservative vs modern dems or reps, then yes, I'd agree. But right now Democrats accept that fact that they want a bigger government, while republicans say they are in favor of a smaller government, unless it's against their personal views, (abortion, drugs, gay marriage).

At the same time, I do see where you're coming from.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but fascism is when one (small) party is in control and has extreme rule over it's people. The U.S. would be more Populist unless I'm mistaken on definitions.

And I still think it's unfair to compare the U.S. to a fascist government, under the rule of either Trump, or Hillary.
The biggest thing I think people need to realize is that no matter what, you will always be under the rule of someone. And I would rather have one like the U.S. where it's an elected body with the interest of the people, rather than one where the group with the most people and biggest guns and do what they want because they can crush all opposition.

I didn't. I'm from Scotland and couldn't vote, but if I could I'd have voted against Trump.

Let's get a movement going, Sup Forums. Let's infiltrate the ANTIFA terrorists and fuck their shit up from the inside. Their childish, destructive tantrums have gone on too long. They are extremists in every sense of the word, wanting to shut down free speech they don't agree with, and murder anybody that doesn't follow their agenda. We need boots on the ground to start taking part in their clusterfuckery and attack their members from within. Law enforcement won't do anything against these faggots, so it's up to us. LET'S RESTORE ORDER TO AMERICA!

...

Got a catchy name for this grass roots movement? Need something that really gets people's attention.

> Muslim HRC supporter lied and said she was attacked by Trump supporters on a subway, assaulted, and spit on. Later arrested for filing false police reports.

Wow, you want to cherry pick a few cases and apply that to the entire group. I may be liberal, but that's not something I do. Everyone's got their extremists. If all you can see is the extremists, then you'll never understand the main position of the group.

> Post any proof that liberals have been "infiltrated" by someone else

It happens all the time
wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/27/veri-j27.html

> Oh the girl assaulted on camera was a liberal? The facts are not on your side but keep making things up, pal.

In the UC Davis case (I don't know which case you're referring to), it was the police who pepper sprayed a bunch of Occupy protesters who were peacefully sitting down.

Well, no. I don't want to go and be an autissimo naming it something like The First Order. If star wars hadn't used it for a shitty reboot, then it might have been fine.

>Wow, you want to cherry-pick
I posted 10 instances, how is that cherry-picking exactly?

>B-bu-but we're being infiltrated look at this PROP SOCIALISM WEBSITE

Are you fuckin' for real right now? kek. Because an obvious left-wing fringe socialist website would never lie, right? Get fucking real kid.

>I don't know which case you're talking about

The girl at Berkeley who was assaulted 2 days ago with pepper spray for simply talking to a news reporter. Are you trying to play stupid now or are you really this misinformed? Also you can't equate police using riot tactics to stop actual riots to a civilian man assaulting a civilian woman for having a different opinion.

>I posted 10 instances, how is that cherry-picking exactly?

There are 320 million people in the US. Presumably that means 160 million liberals (although stats indicate more).

Your sample size of ten incidents, with no controls, no standards and a transparently common narrative cannot tell us anything of value about liberals.

You know what I love is that I see all of this controlled speech bullshit as a direct result of the US education system. Im in my twenties and I remember when I was in school in the 90's bullying was an extreme issue that people were looking for ways to address. This was the peak of participation trophies, varying degrees of special education, integration programs, and if a school board picture didn't have at least 4 races shown with both men and women it was deemed unfit for children's eyes because it might give the wrong impression. We were all taught that words have power, and what we say affects other people. We were all taught that calling someone names can hurt just as much as getting their ass kicked.

I want to say that in the initial stages that it worked. There was a decrease in Bullying and related suicides (I'm too lazy to look for a citation, fuck you. This isn't a peer reviewed journal). I think were it went wrong was with the parents who got super into into this and wouldn't let anything happen to their precious snow flakes. I remember seeing these parents storming around school when I was young, complaining about violent recess conditions (Swear to fucking god), or no left handed scissors for their unique little child. Teachers had to bend to this, because no teacher will ever be able to get away with saying, "I think your kid needs to be toughened up." or, "I think your kid is too shy/awkward/loud/aggressive/etc." instead we all got newly diagnosed disorders, and regulations for special treatment.

The hyper liberal speech controlling protesters are just a logical conclusion of this teaching. Young kids are impressionable. Our first decade or so strongly informs our outlook. I can't overstate how severely implemented this control of speech was integrated into schools. I honestly feel pretty lucky. I went through the earlier iterations of the speech control, but the culture was solidified for the college age kids we see now.

>your sample size with no standards

They're all clearly anti-Trump assaults on civilians. I don't think you have half a clue what you're talking about. The majority of Americans support the stuff he's doing, so I fear you may have just pulled your "stats" out of your ass like every other liberal usually does.

57% of Americans approve of the temporary immigration ban

rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens

Quit trying to push some narrative that the liberal mindset is some normal thing. It's not. Liberalism is dead.

>Liberalism is ded
Lol try again faggot. The democratic party is dead. The majority of us who are liberal have at least one major issue with the current democratic party. All we've seen is a bunch of reactionary ass grabbing. And for reference fuck the hyper liberal dumb shits who think every day should be story time.

...

>They're all clearly anti-Trump assaults on civilians.

That are not representative of the bigger picture. You cannot prove that the protests of 160 to 1.5 million people are violent by pointing out the violent actions of less than 20.

I never defended "liberalism" from your failed understanding of statistics and objective proof because I don't have to, anyone with two brain cells could see you're a shill.

pussy

>rasmussenreports.com/
nope

cbsnews.com/news/americans-sharply-divided-along-partisan-lines-over-travel-ban-trump-cbs-news-poll/

...

>waaaa you're a shill for pointing out the truth

You keep saying "statistics" and "objective proof" when I'm the only one who's actually posted either one in this thread. You have no facts to support your position, just hot air.

When the nazis (favorite buzzword of the left) were doing their thing, you faggots love to blame the germans who stood by and did nothing as being "just as guilty." So tell me, fuck-o. Show me any source where the "peaceful protesters" have stood up and stopped this imaginary "minority" that you keep referencing. Where have the "peaceful liberals" stood up and stopped them from setting shit on fire or destroying property? Show me evidence to support your claim or shut the fuck up.

google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/21/white-trump-protester-sucker-punched-by-black-trump-supporter-in-brutal-video-of-tucson-rally/

google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/03/10/politics/donald-trump-protestor-punch-face/index.html


"Those liberals are just violent fascists!"

KYS

fuckin kek you seriously arguing the validity of rasmussen now?

Fuck outta here shill

2 instances to the 10 I posted. Also those happened a year ago, have you looked out your window lately faggot?

KYS

>shill

Ugh, I'll explain with an example this time.

>Assertion: white people love to shoot students.

>Evidence: Collumbine, Newtown, Anders Brevik, Elliot Rodgers.

>Conclusion: I have found five examples to support my theory proving my assertion about 1.3 billion people correct.

You get it yet?

it's true though. They do

OP is 100% right and anyone that remotely thinks otherwise is a basement dwelling faggot.

Blowjobs illegal? Gtfo out of here, schlomo.

>Democrats and liberals are fascists

Literally stopped reading right there. Your post deserves not to be taken seriously, when the faux Republican tweeting of the United States has taken some of the most authoritarian stances within 3 weeks. Actually, you're all fooled, because he's not the president, Bannon is.

...

Fascism is not a certain policy direction. Fascism is not right or left. Fascism is a style of communication - a mood. Fascism is visceral and angry. This country has been flirting with fascism for a long time. Rush Limbaugh with his bombastic lie telling, scapegoating, and chest pounding Americanism is very much a fascist. Fox News? Joseph Goebbels would look at Fox News in awe at how completely they have realized his fascistic vision. One thing I am certain of; if you think Trump is not a fascist - you don't don't understand fascism - not at all.

So it's not like the Trump and his fascism have appeared out of thin air. The conservatism of Ronald Reagan is dead as a political force and is replaced with fascism. Quit running from it, quit calling yourselves conservatives. Own your radicalism, unfurl your freak flags and give your fascist salutes to El Duce Trump. And prepare to lose in November because there still is a sane majority out here that perseveres.

And spare me the tripe about fascism being a leftist or socialist ideology, or about state ownership. If you think that you need to turn off Beck pick up a few books by Paxton and Eco.

Fascism is by definition militaristic, so liberals and and democrats really aren't fascists.

Their intolerance of criticism and willingness to suppress or shout down dissenting opinion does make arch liberalism a form of totalitarianism though.

/pedantry over

>literally stopped reading right there

>literally can't handle the truth

ok, snowflake. don't claim you're educated and don't live in a fucking bubble when you get triggered by a few words on Sup Forums. fuckin kek

tell me what's factually wrong about my post.

>your post deserves not to be taken seriously

you can't just silence an opposing viewpoint just because you disagree with it. that's precisely something a fascist would do.

haha faggot

All this poetry and not one actual fact. Sad really.

>OMG Goebbels would looove Fox News
>all this chest-pounding

Notice how liberals never have actual facts, just colorful metaphors and similes not at all based in reality? Yeah, you've noticed too.

It might just be that I'm not quite as left as alot of other leftists are, but aren't you taking this to extremes a bit?

Like obviously you would for the sake of your argument, but in reality it's only the fucking third wave feminazis and their fucking irl Tumblr army that's fucking it up for the majority of the left. They're the stupidest, and the most outspoken, and as a result you've based your opinion of the left on the retarded minority.

The term fascist is used too much. Both Dems and GOP are shit stains and corrupt. Both left/right people just have confirmation bias and call anyone names who disagrees with narrative provided for you.

We're fucked. Journalism is dead and controlled by corporations and share holders.

social media spread fake news for left/right

24 hour news channels dilute journalism with endless speculation.

>>"Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong.

>>"Everything in the state". The Government is supreme.

These two statements epitomize the current "Republican" president and his people.

I say we just embrace it and become the fascists liberals make us out to be.

Advantages:
>Place liberals into gas chambers
>Shoot liberals
>bomb campuses
>Round up and deport the jews
>Round up and deport the blacks
>place liberals in rape-camps just like ISIS would have.

Disadvantages:
>No asian waifus :C
>Liberals will whine and piss slightly louder than they do now
>Jews will try and use central banks to destroy the country.

I suppose we could just continue with our current trend of nationalism, but really, when it comes down to it liberals will accuse us of extreme fascism if we disagree with them in anyway for any reason.

Why not pull out all the stops and just go for it? Infiltrate an AntiFa black block and start quietly stabbing them to death.

For Right Wing Death Squads and kick in the doors of known activists and execute them.

I mean, if we're gonna get accused of being extremist fascists, we'd might as well deserve it, right?

It's not like they'll call us anything else, they're like broken records, or retarded children, that are incapable of critical or creative thought.

I tried to talk to one the other day and all of his arguments devolved into "true communism has never been tried" as if that some how justified his violent rhetoric.

I'm not even sure liberals count as human at this point, you have to be able to analyze the world around you to be sapient.

...

I fucking love that end line dude. Imma steal that shit.

Question for libtards in this thread

do you choose
a)
>police are violent psychopaths and cannot be trusted.
or
b)
>No one needs a gun, only the police should have guns, and you can always call the police.

Leftist hypocrisy is so absurd you'd think it was performance art.

>Praise Kek

>this is now a kek thread.

...

neither, dipshit.

but guns should be harder to obtain. much like a driver's license. Also just like every other profession, there are good cops and bad cops.

its the methods the left uses, user. put simply people are to afraid to stand up for themselves in this tough world so they want the government to do it for them. they are terrified and have absolutely no way to defend themselves. they need daddy to tell them everything is ok and they'll be taken care of. when people get together wearing masks to destroy things, the rest of us know they are cowards. they won't show their face because they are scared of what they've become. the very thing they think they are fighting against. its cowardly.

How's about option c?

>There's room for improvement in the fields of law enforcement and gun control.

Right wing simple mindedness is so absurd, but I'm a liberal so I can rationally point to poor education and political tribalism as the culprit rather than writing it off as performance art, like a simpleton might do.

You probably voted against your own independence

This guy sounds educated.

You sound like a pompous buffoon. Typical.

I'm sure your average 7th grade science student sounds like a pompous buffoon to you.

to piggy back on that a little further, no one wants to pay for people who whine and destroy things when they don't get their way. we teach our children this is wrong because it raises spoiled little cowards. i personally love it when people rioting in the streets get a baton over the face. i LOVE the look on their faces when the cops grab them. they scream and cry like they don't understand why they are being arrested. its the ultimate life lesson and you really see it captured on the look in their eyes and the way their voices crack as they are being dragged away. you call it fascism. the rest of us call it order and there is nothing a limp wristed liberal can do to stop order.

So then racism isn't, and hasn't, been a problem for decades. Also, cops are heroes and BLM are just race baiting cherry pickers.

Maybe one could fix A so that B can be achieved

Democracy is a shit form of government anyways.
Majority rule isn't fair.
People are stupid, and will continue to drink the kool-aid.

"CBS" Didn't their poles say Trump had no chance being elected?
>i'm sure they're rite this time

>guns should be harder to obtain

>REEEEE they asked voters for a PICTURE ID to make sure non-citizens aren't voting! FUCKING RACISTS

kek

liberals are just one big ball of fucking hypocrisy

Solid words, guy. I would just say that what some people call hyper liberal is no longer liberal, and not because people took LIBERAL ideas too far, they took PROGRESSIVE ideas too far and have morphed into a dead end culture known as the regressive left. They are regressives.

Care to elaborate on what you're trying to say here?

>MFW democrats and republicans are BOTH retarded and you will all cause the USA to go down the shitter faster than it can be saved

Being non-partisan is where it's at.

Isn't a big thing about fascism a strong desire for nationalism and isolationism? Dems and Libs have the opposite of this. I was under the understanding that fascism and communism were opposite extremes that both shared a belief in authoritarian governments.

youtube.com/watch?v=tytKO3HoRz4

Dems/libs share 9/10 tenets of fascism. If I score a 90 on a test, that's an A at most universities.

my main fuckin man right here

Apparently no one paid attention to the 20th century and the lessons learned so we will probably have to go through it all again.

Everybody can be guilty of cherry picking.

>Blowjobs illegal? Gtfo out of here, schlomo.

You didn't know anti-sodomy laws make blowjobs illegal?

It's ironic you use that quote, when the liberals assaulting people with different opinions, rioting, destroying public property, destroying private property, and blocking roads, stores, highways are literally calling themselves anti-fascists.

Not that I disagree but let me ask, at its core is fascism more of a set of political ideals or just a set of cheap tricks to bolster your political position? Because it seems like we're mixing the two into the definition.

Yeah they're both pretty fascist in that regard. Fuck I'm glad I'm an anarcho-communist.

If you are fighting bigotry and intolerance you'd be fighting the political left. They are literally the thing they say they are against.

You didn't know those anti-sodomy laws were also voted for by Democrats. Those laws are a sign of the times they were passed in.

I came to this realization after the last election. when i look back now, i feel like an embarassed clown that used to wear jncos or had 30 piercings in my face then wondered why no one wanted to hire me for a job

I like the term regressive left a lot more than hyper liberal. Thanks Bruh.

I have a lot of hope for my generation. We aren't all idiots, but right now the regressives are the most vocal. There aren't enough people who are relatively moderate speaking up. That needs to change or we are doomed to be grouped in with the butthurt rhetoric.

For now let the regressive lemmings jump off a cliff of their own making.

nice cucking queenie

>well said buddy

>A cliff of their own making

couldn't have worded it better myself

Found a Sup Forums gobbler