Do you agree with these ratings?

do you agree with these ratings?

They should both be a lot lower.

TFA yes

Return is too low though.

>Metacritic for movies before 2000
>accurate

>TFA yes
lmao
You CANT be a true Star Wars fan if you unironically like TFA. It has nothing to do with the old SW movies

>no true Scotsman

> It has nothing to do with the old SW movies

I'm fine with anything "star wars" that isn't george lucas at this point.

RotJ is underrated, TFA is just trash.

If you dislike marvel movies but think TFA is good, you're a hypocrite

I agree with the user score more here than the critic score.

I like both because I'm not an autistic contrarian.

V
IV

POWER GAP

VI
VII

POWER GAP

III

POWER GAP
I
II

put VII between I and II and you're right

totally agree

>hurrr look guys I heard the name of a fallacy once
Retard. There can be qualifications for things .

>do I fit in yet guys?

Return of the Jedi has some of the best scenes and set pieces in the trilogy.

What is memorable about TFA? It might be more consistent but it never has any flashes of brilliance.

A fallacy is still a fallacy, dude.

The magic of lowered expectations.

Jedi followed Empire, The Force Awakens followed the prequels.

Exchange III with VII, then put a small gap between III and VI, and I'll agree.

at least 6 has a space battle not even that shit 7 had one

all ROTJ had going for it was the last 30 or so minutes.

most of the movie was pointless filler that stretched on way too long.

I agree, for example Jabba's palace: all the creatures, the band and Jabba himself areamazingly unique. Show me such a scene with similar characters in TFA.

6 also had so much ''mysterious'' stuff in it. Jabba's palace, Boba Fett, the emperor, while all 7 can offer is fucking snoke and captain silverarmor