Dear Sup Forums...

Dear Sup Forums, I can understand why a truly poor person that has intelligence and drive that oddly enough cannot succeed would support progressive/communist ideas.

But, why would rich celebrities like Madonna support socialism/communism/progressivism?

Other urls found in this thread:

ew.com/article/2016/12/09/madonna-calls-out-sexism-abuse-billboard-speech/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>celebrity
>madonna

pick one dipshit.

Normal humans have this thing called empathy which makes them care about the well being of their fellow man even if it doesn't help themselves.

1. has millions of dollars
2. free lunch wherever she goes

yeah, she's a celebrity.

>Normal humans have this thing called empathy which makes them care about the well being of their fellow man even if it doesn't help themselves

But, socialism/progressivism has never demonstrated empathy. Collectivism nearly killed all the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock.

Everyone knows how communism fails people.

True socialism is a trap, it takes a failure of empathy to embrace it.

This is the communist party of Portland, Oregon.

They embrace and push every single progressive idea right now.
1. Kill or depose Trump
2. illegal alien love
3. Muslim love
4. 3rd wave feminism and SJW central

Pushing for a huge government control of every aspect of your lives.

And capitalism doesn't? If it weren't for unions and regulation we'd still have kids working in coal mines 80 hours a week.

Why would a white person in the USA that wants to succeed in a career want communism/socialism/progressivism Sup Forums?

And true capitalism is hell.

>But, why would rich celebrities like Madonna support socialism/communism/progressivism?

empathy

yeah but we don't faggot, hence it works. The only reason we know how you*feel* about this it is because it works as well. Back to tumblr you commie faggot.

>implying that communism has ever pushed for success and happiness among its people

But, we know true capitalism works for more people than socialism.
1. Japan
2. United States
3. Germany
4. South Korea

All examples of free open market with minimal government interference.

It works because of socialist ideas you dumb fuck.

You aren't my brother/sister/dad/mom. I don't want to work hard to support your lazy ass while I slave in the pit. Fuck you cocksucker. Get a job and support yourself for once.

>It works because of socialist ideas you dumb fuck.

I know it's hard not to insult everyone that doesn't believe like you do, so I understand your stupidity.

But, socialist ideas include equality, which has nothing to do with quality.

Everyone is not equal. Everyone is not capable of becoming an Einstein.

>implying that communism has ever pushed for success and happiness among its people
That's not what I said faggot.
All the countries you listed have regulations, unions and socialist safety nets you retard.

To answer OP's question. P fucking R. It's great PR and will land more money in her pocket, 800 million is just not enough. Next time some emotionally driven dog feels like the world isn't going her/his way, Madonna's fake speech will ring through hi/her/whatever the fuck made up non-sense head and in defiance to the ever looming patriarchy she'll strike back by buying some Madonna products.

Plus Madonna she gets to pretend she feel connected to the common people. A little vacation from her bubble of excess, if you will.

Socialism/progressivism has failed every country it has landed in.

The Cuban and Venezuelan governments have failed to demonstrate empathy. You're simply wrong. Some ideas can simply be ignored.

I have a career. I also have empathy for those less fortunate than me.

Your blatant stupidity is what bugs us. We are not equal. We are not ants. Your lack of any sensible comprehension is irksome. Can you understand how a leech operates??

Wrong. Markets in 3 of those countries are regulated as fuck. Also, much higher taxes on the super rich, strong unions, and more support for education.

Unregulated capitalism is as bad as communism.

What are you even talking about, that has nothing to do with anything I said. Are you retarded?

But, competitiveness helps everyone, because it gives everyone a chance to succeed.

But, It only takes a total fucking retard to embrace true socialism. Someone that seriously wants to see everyone fail equally.

it still works faggot. Never said it has to one or the other. Obviously one true form of X will always have problems. Our system works, not for every last mother fucker, but enough. It will never be perfect.

You don't seem to understand my point, I'm not advocating for a socialist state. I'm just saying social programs to help the poor are a good thing.

Because she's a woman.

She is parasitic by nature.


Yes, it really IS THAT SIMPLE, yet true.

You are the retard that embraces Socialism, socialist ideology, and ideas, right?

The one that embraces equality among all people, that burger flippers should earn a living wage, right?

marketing. By being in the news as "A person for the people" she can regain some of her fame back

>it gives everyone a chance to succeed.
Not everyone is born into a favorable situation and a little help goes a long way.

by embracing progressivism, you're embracing a socialist country. yes, you're embracing a government that is big enough to "take care of us all", reduce free speech, and control production.

She's in favor of removing free speech, so that dissenting ideas are shut down, just like all progressives at this point.

Is there not a single intelligent person on Sup Forums that can defend this?

I'm pretty sure i read somewhere that she got forced into some roles and people took advantage of her when she was beginning her career, which is why shes vocal about womans rights in particular and equal rights in general.

ew.com/article/2016/12/09/madonna-calls-out-sexism-abuse-billboard-speech/

Etc etc. you can google more articles.

The point is that part of socialism is equality. you arrive at equality through progressive thought.

Stop likening Socialism and Communism, they are different. Progress is also why we arent living in mud huts.

TLDR: Get the fuck out of your house once in a while.

Does it work? Wealth inequality is ever increasing, automation will soon make unemployment skyrocket and the only thing that can save us is socialist safety nets.

Nope.

This is why mostly women defend that.

>Stop likening Socialism and Communism, they are different.

That's just playing hide the ball. The rest of us all know they're hand in hand.

Progressivism, socialism, communism in America are one in the same.

The goal of socialism is communism - Karl Marx

>Does it work? Wealth inequality is ever increasing

Capitalism has built the biggest middle class in the world. It does it in Germany, Japan and South Korea.

Companies compete for good employees by offering better benefits, safer working environments, higher pay with career progression and responsibility.

Happiness doesn't come from government programs and regulation.

>The goal of socialism is communism

Vladimir Lenin

There is nothing good in government control Sup Forums

>Companies compete for good employees by offering better benefits, safer working environments, higher pay with career progression and responsibility.
They're required to offer certain benefits by the state and are required to follow certain safety regulations by the state.
>Happiness doesn't come from government programs and regulation.
It doesn't come from slaving away at a corporation either.

Wouldn't you want the possibility of becoming a millionaire?

The United States has more millionaires than any other country due to capitalism. The good life awaits those who try.

The good life doesn't await those that depend on the government.

>by embracing progressivism, you're embracing a socialist country. yes, you're embracing a government that is big enough to "take care of us all", reduce free speech, and control production.
I never said any of that. I embrace programs like Social Security and Medicare.

>It doesn't come from slaving away at a corporation either.

People at the top and near the top love what they do, they devote 12-16 hours a day, with no personal life, because they enjoy it. Success doesn't come easy in the capitalist world.

Only the government promises you things for nothing.

>The one that embraces equality among all people, that burger flippers should earn a living wage, right?
Why shouldn't they?

EMPATHY

kek

Even those programs ended up costing more than they were worth, because of corruption within them.

The bigger a government is, the more corrupt it is. It has always been this way. There is no intelligent defense of socialism/progressivism.

>People at the top and near the top love what they do, they devote 12-16 hours a day, with no personal life, because they enjoy it. Success doesn't come easy in the capitalist world.
>because they enjoy it
Or maybe they feel pressure to succeed and waste their lives working for a company that doesn't give a shit about them.

>Why shouldn't they

Because the world needs innovators and should reward them for their hard work.

Burger flippers offer burgers, which is nice. But, an engineer has spent years learning his/her craft to help many more people and that should be worth something, and encourage more to try in fields that pay more and offer more advancement.

We don't want to reward people for mediocrity. It simply breeds more mediocrity.

>Even those programs ended up costing more than they were worth, because of corruption within them.
Both programs have been running successfully for decades.
>The bigger a government is, the more corrupt it is. It has always been this way.
And who owns politicians in this country? Corporations not the people. It's corrupt but not in the way you think.

>Or maybe they feel pressure to succeed and waste their lives working for a company that doesn't give a shit about them

Good companies simply haven't done this. They demonstrate their thanks for your hard labor with all kinds of incentives, like more pay, more benefits, more vacation, more responsibility.

A company that doesn't do this will failure at the end of that tunnel.

The most successful capitalism oriented companies have demonstrated the ability to reward their best contributors.

Engineers make more than burger flippers, burger flippers can still make at least a livable wage.

In Mein Kampf Adolf Hitler constantly pokes fun at German communists/socialists because they are of a "privileged class" who support these ideas because they are popular and fashionable.

Those that are actually poor don't have time to invest into politics, they are too busy trying to put bread on the table.

>The most successful capitalism oriented companies have demonstrated the ability to reward their best contributors.
The most successful companies are the ones that cut costs everywhere they can.

take Welfare for example. It is demonstrably a failure. Barely two points of people living beyond the poverty limit since it started.

It's cost 17 trillion dollars and has produced little more than many families that are more than more families that are generations on welfare.

>The most successful companies are the ones that cut costs everywhere they can.

That's simply false. They cut costs in America as a result of government regulation. Now that some of the regulation red tape is gone, hiring thousands has happened.

Oh fuck off, I'm world traveled you impudent slave. Don't lecture me underage plebeian. This mother fucker links an entertainment website as if they're not all the same machine. Get fucked with your "equality". You fuckers are obsessed with that term as if it's a good thing. There's enough equality in the world. The rich are equal among the rich and the poor among the poor, ect. Bleeding heart faggots, you're all a bunch of Borg like Marxists indoctrinated lemmings.

You just do not understand the fundamental truth in this life that only comes with age, so let me clue you in. You will never be anything worth a shit till you learn how to step on the little guy without remorse. It is the only way to true wealth and power. It is the only way to live out your dreams. Someone, by necessity, will have to be stepped on.

Mark my words, if you keep this line of thought up, one day you'll be on your death bed realizing the absurdity that is life, realizing that all your feel good hopeful ideas will all be for not. Realizing that in the grand scope of things nothing matters, there is no prize and death is the ultimate outcome all that you did, on that day you will be thinking, dammit, I should have stepped up my game and gotten ahead instead of wasting my time with equality and the useless needs of the common. Madonna knows this now and so should you before it's too late.

You're next step is to rationalize why this can't be and then total denial. The hard part is getting past the denial, facing your true nature. If you never get passed it, you will never get the life you truly want. You will always settle for less.

To stay relevant in the public eye.
And sell her music.

That's been Madonnas entire story for half a century. Welcome noobs.

>>why would rich celebs support socialism?
>empathy
No
Or at least, not necessarily.

Rich celebs are rich because poor people buy their albums (or songs) and see their movies. So if you want people to keep buying your albums and watching your movies, you better not come off as some kind of dick. In fact, to be a multi-millionaire artist of some sort, you're basically sucking your fans' dicks as much as they're sucking yours. Otherwise it could affect your sales.

>i sold out long before you ever even heard my name
>i sold my soul to make a record
>dipshit and you bought one

because that is what the globalist agenda is, a false sense of global freedom and friendship but what it really means is an enslaved planet under one ruling elite.
The celebrities have to fall in line or end up 'suicided' or 'an accident' and face public humiliation and smear campaigns.
See Michael Jackson for details.

It keeps people from starving, I'd say that's a success.

When they cut costs, it's because costs were to high for the company to stay alive and a profit wasn't being obtained since costs grew.

Efficient motivated intelligent employees get rewarded handsomely when they help a company grow and succeed.

You don't get a successful company by hiring equality. You get a successful company by hiring and keep motivated people.

This is how unions bring companies to their knees, and how Detroit doesn't make cars anymore.

Well, Mein Kampf is a sensible, well-written, well thought out perspective on modern 21st century governmental reform.

lol

>They cut costs in America as a result of government regulation. Now that some of the regulation red tape is gone, hiring thousands has happened.
Nice alternative facts.

>What is LEAN and TPS

Nigger, you dum

It produces dependency on government programs. It's not made up, it's fact and it fails bright and upcoming people that otherwise might contribute to the world.

because it helps them not feel bad for having succeeded where so many fail

>Nice alternative facts.

What causes costs to increase? The EPA put my parents out of business because they didn't have the right kind of tanks. There was nothing wrong with the tanks they had, they just didn't fit the new regulation

The costs were too high to replace them, and as a result it put my parents right out of business. The government continues receiving it's funds to regulate, but my parents business was gone.

It keeps people on their feet.

>It keeps people on their feet.

It keeps people on their knees.

FTFY, no problem.

>What causes costs to increase? The EPA put my parents out of business because they didn't have the right kind of tanks. There was nothing wrong with the tanks they had, they just didn't fit the new regulation
I guess your parents should've planned better.

Capitalism keeps them on their knees.

Sup Forums Once again shows it can argue about things with no facts or understanding.

Some classic really stupid misconceptions.

Lets start with the dumbest thing
>>Progressivism is bad
Jesus christ you are stupid bro. Literally the only consistent theme in that ideology is Progress. Being against that is the most goddamn stupid thing you can be against. Just sit in your rocking chair and don't disrupt the rest of civilization.

Now if you are against current PROGRESSIVES, you might have a point, at all.

>>Capitalism is the one way people do anything.
Ahaha, whoa there buddy. Not everyone is as lazy as you. Incentive structures are not absolutes, and a given one *encourages* people. Many people aren't encouraged by money, and there is no way I would be such a moron as to claim that Capitalism is a failure because of that.

Maybe stop playing in absolutes, because it makes you sound like a foaming at the mouth idiot.

>>The Government cannot be trusted, it will ruin everything.
Classic, Sup Forums, anarchist trash. Does the idea that we have some of the least corrupt and best run governments HUMANITY HAS EVER HAD mean anything to you?

Of course not, they are not perfect, so you flail your arms around like some retard who burned himself on the stove.

Maybe you should fight (or at least argue) for government that *doesn't* suck.

Too hard? Too scary? You think that boogieman is going to come get you? Well suck it up you sheltered losers, the only reason you have the society that works before you is because of that government.

You know what immigrants like when they come to America? Its not the freedom. Its the LAW and ORDER. Maybe you had too privileged a live to realize how sweet it is here,

Or are you too Triggered because I said the word "privileged".

>>But I am afraid of real things that never happen to me. I heard about them happen once even!

Ok buddy, maybe some of that is real. Most of it isn't.

Correction: Closed-shop states that give Unions the power to choose hiring policies for companies is why Detroit doesn't make cars anymore.

Collective bargaining and unionization are good things, especially in the industrial age where businesses can have thousands of easily and equally disposable employees. Unionization allows for workers to band together and fight for better work conditions, competitive pay and benefits, retirement packages, etc...

Truth be told, you wouldn't need unions if the government had backed worker's rights from the beginning.

Besides, unions also provide skilled and trained labor, which is the trade-off that companies get for the higher pay. Sure, some unions can be shitty, but trade unions like the IBEW, the Teamsters, the UBC, the Ironworkers, the Pipefitters, the Boilermakers, the Machinists, etc... churn out highly-skilled labor and are an asset to the middle and working classes.

But I guess you're right. Unions are just an absolute evil and businesses will value an employee for their dedication and hard work because it's the right thing to do.