After the antics at his first press conference as president, is it even dawning on his supporters that that guy is nuts?

After the antics at his first press conference as president, is it even dawning on his supporters that that guy is nuts?

Other urls found in this thread:

thedaily.online/post/2017/02/06/trump-literally-can-not-stop-laughing-at-the-anger-of-the-left
qz.com/913318/a-jewish-reporter-asked-trump-about-anti-semitic-attacks-and-trump-told-him-to-sit-down-and-be-quiet/
twitter.com/DavidNir/status/832309058115874816
twitter.com/Kris_Sacrebleu/status/832325609132953604
youtube.com/watch?v=EVOR34IZ4Es
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

his supporters are completely gorilla shit insane too

lmaoing at your life.
thedaily.online/post/2017/02/06/trump-literally-can-not-stop-laughing-at-the-anger-of-the-left

Samefagging. Advice - stop sucking fake news tit, homeboi

It's dawning on us that the field of journalism is nearly entirely populated with liberals.

No matter what he does, they are only going to inform the American people of the worst of it and they are going to intentionally keep Americans ignorant of anything he does right.

The blue parts are where people actually live.

if that were the case why wasn't every state blue?

The Trump supporters on my FB feed were all like "Trump REALLY told them yesterday, He ROCKS!

Sharing that map should be mandatory in the Trumpanzee starter kit. Hey retard, guess where a vast majority of the country lives! I'll give you a hint. NOT THE RED AREAS.

More people live in the red areas than the blue areas.

The total population of the red area > the entire population of the blue area.

After a long time of suppression, finally the silent majority of people took their voice: idiots elected an idiot. Most people are idiots and for the first time, they decided the election.

My perspective as a Brit was that it was a great press conference. It's nice to see a genuine guy in a position of political authority when all you seem to get anymore are corporatist shills. He's seems to have a good work ethic too. He was spot on with the BBC as well. Americans seem to laud them as some journalistic impartiality gold standard but that couldn't be further from the truth. Sure, they're not as bad as the likes of CNN but I regular see them editing videos, interviews after asking leading questions etc. to put a liberal bias on them. The man is more worldly than he gets credit for yet the left same to paint him as some lunatic because he prefers to speak as a regular guy. Personally, I prefer that to politically groomed robo-shill speak

I watched the 1st 30mins and thought it was p good. I don't like his attacks on information leaks but I understand it from his standpoint. I fail to see how people are getting that he's a loon from this. He's not reading off some telepromter. He's got some notes and is just tellking what's he'd gone through and what he's doing as prez. I don't even see how this is a big deal.

>regular guy

He talks like a bullying con-man

Which is correct.. he fucked them.up..The media., As usual, shit all over themselves.. what do you expect
.? He is at war with them.

You are a dumbass. He threw a tantrum on live, international TV.

This is a good example of how fucking stupid a trump supporter is.

Interpret it how you wish. The main take away from it is that he speaks is mind and is not groomed by anybody on what and what not to say. That's a far cry from Hillary with her 'public and private positions'.

1. is he retarded?

2. mentally ill?

3. dementia?

which is it? the world is laughing, this is H I L A R I O U S

Trust me when I say, most of the world is paying attention to what your orange president is saying America.

Even better, is watching it on CNN and laughing at their mediocre attempts to discredit Trump.

Their rhetoric wears thin, and you can see the liberal bias shining through as they get more desperate as Trump calls them out on their bullshit.

Your president might actually be Deez Nuts in disguise, but his promises (which it would be really cool if they came to fruition) and his tendency to act quickly (if not a bit irrationally) might just be the best thing that has happened to America in a long time.

Left fucktards can suck a fat orange one.

hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>retarded enough to defend the retard!

Threw a tantrum? He seemed to be enjoying the whole thing. He even said he was. That's really selling it short I think.

>My perspective as a Brit was that it was a great press conference. It's nice to see a genuine guy in a position of political authority when all you seem to get anymore are corporatist shills. He's seems to have a good work ethic too. He was spot on with the BBC as well
My perspective as a fellow Brit is that you are clearly deranged and I'd guess you're thinking of voting UKIP

A Jewish reporter asked Trump about anti-Semitic attacks, and Trump told him to sit down and be quiet

qz.com/913318/a-jewish-reporter-asked-trump-about-anti-semitic-attacks-and-trump-told-him-to-sit-down-and-be-quiet/

Trump's exchange w/reporter asking about 48 bomb threats to Jewish centers: "A very insulting question."

twitter.com/DavidNir/status/832309058115874816

Here is Donald Trump talking about the uranium. Word for Word #TrumpPressConference

twitter.com/Kris_Sacrebleu/status/832325609132953604

>but I regular see them editing videos, interviews after asking leading questions etc
I think we'll need a citation on that. You've actually been in a BBC editing suite and seen them editing their videos to put a liberal bias on? Because that is what you have just publicly claimed.

If everyone but you is retarded maybe it's time you considered the possibility that it's actually you who is the retard?

As an outsider we pretty much just assume the Americans that complain about Trump are the whiny University aged millennials still sucking on the liberal teat to look cool in front of their friends. It's also pretty much internationally recognised that you have the worst media. Fox News is probably the only thing you've got close to fair reporting

even fox news is turning against this moron. but that's also fake news. sad!

This is millions of times better than Hillary winning

>trump wins
>makes the entire world hate republicans, trump and the right wing.

this is the biggest non-violent victory that leftists in the west could ever imagine.

WOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

That map is fake

The majority of America live in CITIES or the BLUE areas. Take an example of one state: Ohio has 2.3mill living in rural or RED areas. With total population of 11.6mill that leaves 9.3MILL people CONCENTRATED in the BLUE areas of Major cities like Cleveland, Columbuc and cincinati. although red has far more square miles it has an insainly lower population.

>The media., As usual, shit all over themselves
You mean the part where they politely pointed out his was giving out incorrect facts about the size of his electoral college victory, for him to first claim he was "only talking about Republicans" and when that was disproved then airily wave it off as "figures I was just given....but I have seen them somewhere". This is the leader of the free world, not the president of a second-rate local council

God I love trump

This man has obliterated the GOP. I hope they let him stay for a while.

>The main take away from it is that he speaks is mind and is not groomed by anybody on what and what not to say
And isn't that exactly what's so scary - he has a passing association with the truth, a need to be "right" "best" and "biggest" and an inability to even consider views other than his own

>As an outsider
>Fox News is probably the only thing you've got close to fair reporting
please stay outside, thankfully our orange overlord will assure that

So let me break it down for you.

You see video A presented outside of the BBC. This does not seem to have any sort of spin on it.
You see video A presented by the BBC. This differs from the original video greatly and a spin has been introduced.

no it isn't.

>Fox News

BAGAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

>The majority of America live in CITIES or the BLUE areas.

you're wrong. It's nearly 50/50 city/rural. More people live in rural areas.

He constanlty starts sentences
and never finishes them, but instead he drifts, you know, he just talks on without ever getting back at, and that's not the only thing, the thing is he keeps talking, and I'll be honest, but I've never seen more dishonest media, but I think the financial media are honest, but I got a phonecall, there was this story they told about the women, big frontpage story, but the called up my office, "we never said that!", I have to tell you! They never gave us a restraction, but then I went on to other things. Next question!

Small hands equals small cock

Census bureau says 80% of America's population lives in BLUE cities. Why we have given electoral college votes to square miles of empty land rather than densly populated cities is beyond me

Yeah Fox News gave the questions of a presidential debate to one of the candidates hahah.

Oh hang on a second...

They always decide the election. Stop kidding yourself.

Please, enlighten us.

What has he done that hasn't been a train wreck where the train is pulling carts of manure that is on fire?

I'll wait.

nope
www census gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-33.html

OK, so you haven't actually seen them editing their videos. You have seen two different videos with different emphases. But no idea which is closer to the truth.

And a citation still required. How about linking to a couple examples on line of such videos? Or is this just anecdotal, defended with further anecdote?

actually Megyn Kelly admitted that Fox gaves Trump all of the questions to the Fox news "debate.

but you're a retard or a Russian.

not even close. use google faggot

Democratic primary debate*

Fixed that for you, loser.

Bless, you are trying hard though little snowflake.

Actually I'm a Brit and he's already stated he wants to make a deal with us as a matter of priority. So you'll probably be seeing more of us.

Not since the post-war era.

Why are Muslims good for America?

He doesnt give a shit about the uk.

Where is that trade deal now?

Has he forgotton.

Nope, the uk is irrelevant.

Snowflake probably reads the daily mail child porno.

i would absolutely take his word as well.

>all of the journalists at Fox News receive talking points from Rupert Murdock, which makes them nothing more than bobble heads.
>but the fact that all other journalists receiving their talking points from the Council on Foreign Relations via the the Associated Press doesn't undermine their credibility.

I said 'I've seen them'. That pretty much straight off the bat is me admitting to anecdote. I didn't make the claim they do this as a matter of regularity. I've seen them present edited versions of original full videos that put an incorrect spin on them. That's why I refuse to put them on a pedestal as most, including yourself, are doing

Not really a point in arguing with trump supporters on sites like Sup Forums like they're just normal people. They're either white supremacists or edgelords who thinks it's hilarious to see everything going to shit (as long as it's not affecting them)

Trump calling out the media when no one else does reinforces the fact that he is an outsider. That's exactly why he was elected in the first place. The media lies constantly and they obviously have their own agenda that they were going to push regardless of how Trump treated them. There's no reason for Trump to play nice with people who are paid to smear him.

>This does not seem to have any sort of spin on it.
In other words, it agrees with your particular viewpoint
> This differs from the original video greatly and a spin has been introduced
So this one does not agree with your viewpoint, so it must be doctored and the other one the unbiased one.

Did it ever occur to you that exactly the opposite could be happening? And do you then go and do some research to see if you can find more facts and come to a conclusion?

No, because that would require both work and critical thinking, and you're happier in your bubble.

What's the tally on Americans killed by Muslim immigrants compared to Americans killed by rednecks and hillbillies?

At least the Muslims don't go all Deliverance on you before they kill you.

doesn't matter, i'm isolated from reality and brown people scare me

The media just quotes what he says then shows the actual stats and facts side by side.

But in this alternative fact world, I guess that's doubleplus bad.

i watched it and it was quite amusing
what was nuts about it?
that he called the media liars?

As pointed out, the blue areas are the major population centers of the country.

Also, the red areas are inhabited by a bunch of rural inbred redneck retards who shouldn't even be given Nielsen boxes because of their poor choices, much less the ability to decide national policy by electing a retard.

Considering the 3 biggest killer of those in the red areas is Diabetes, Heart Disease and ATV accidents, is it really a good idea to let them vote?

people unironically believe this after watching that press conference, and it's absolutely the problem. this is beyond identity politics, it's like professional fucking wrestling.

What you actually said was
>but I regular see them editing videos, interviews after asking leading questions etc. to put a liberal bias on them
You did not say that you had seen videos - you said you had seen them editing videos and interviews after asking questions.

So how could you do that if you weren't there? And now, having been called on your bullshit, you're starting to back away from your original claim of knowledge of deliberate editing, to an admittedly anecdotal claim of editorial bias on behalf of the BBC, but with no corroborating evidence. Do I have that about right?

Which, distilled down, comes to you saying "I think the BBC has a liberal bias, but I have no evidence to support this claim".

I'm pretty sure 90% of Sup Forums Trump supporters are doing it for the lulz. I have never met these crazy people in real life.

But them I'm a normal person so have no need to go to trailer parks.

>No, because that would require both work and critical thinking, and you're happier in your bubble.

/r/iamverysmart.

You seriously think an unedited, original video has more chance of being biased than an edited one? Are you clinically retarded?

You're misinformed

The russians, basically

yyyoouuu....are a retard.

and so is the dipshit you voted for. You are the strongest argument for a national eugenics program.

An internet for you. I wish people would see that they are more likely to die from that cheesburger they stuff into their fat gullet, or struck by lightning than die from a muslim. But of course, you cant logic the sheeple..hell, most muders are committed by someone the victim knew.

You think you need to see people editing clips on a computer to know things were edited? Isn't it enough if you've heard/seen the original content and then subsequently heard/seen the cut down version by the BBC?

All these kids trolling in here.

Hey dipshit.

We realise he's an idiot. However entirely worth it, just so people like you learn something useful.

That was entertaining as fuck but it's not right. He's not pacing himself at all. He's only had the job for less than a month and he's already losing his patience.

I can agree with him on some issues but he keeps bringing up Hilary and bragging about winning the election.

I loved it. Fuck MSM. You'd genuinely have to be out of your god damned mind to believe a fucking word they say.

Mike Flynn having to resign wasn't because of Russian espionage, but you wouldn't KNOW that if all you did was tune into MSM. So no, fuck them. Treat them like little babies because it's how they deserve to be treated.

ITT: Liberals believe that the people who live a 20 minute drive from a city are party of a city's population.

>You seriously think an unedited, original video has more chance of being biased than an edited one? Are you clinically retarded?
Were you there for the entire footage being taken? No? Then how could you know what was and wasn't edited, taken out of context?

Am I clinically retarded? No, I have the power of critical thought and I'm exposing f;laws in an argument. You'll notice I haven't actually expressed an opinion on any potential bias of the BBC.

I also note that, in tradition of this sort of challenge, you're now working ad hominems into your responses, because that always helps to win an argument - much better than evidence.

quick, get your head back in the sand before you do any research, it'll burst your bubble

It has to do with population density and education, or the lack thereof.

TRUMP IS THE SHERIFF, NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT HUH GUYS?

youtube.com/watch?v=EVOR34IZ4Es

yeah, liberals

Well, depends on the traffic. I mean, I live in the city and it's still a half hour to 45 minute commute for me to get downtown every day during rush hour.

that train that is about to slam into germany is the I slam train

The dude can't even get HIS facts right and then gets pissed at "fake news."

Clear your history and cookies and look at default YouTube's homepage and you' wont' find the press conference anywhere.

I wonder why.

Does he not have a guy that does his speeches...

>Isn't it enough if you've heard/seen the original content
How do you know you've seen all of the original content. All you've probably seen is two differently-edited clips.

And you're offering no evidence to back up your claim, so I have to believe you? Which I don't.

I want you to show me the same video edited by two different organisations, one of which is the BBC, and demonstrate editorial bias. But you can't. You (or your acolytes) have tried to insult me, but have offered no evidence.

...

Judging by the way you talk you're at least autistic if not retarded. That's not an ad hominem, just an observation. I've got nothing against autistic people.

But can you seriously not work out what the difference between original and edited footage is? Let's say that footage exists that is 10 minutes long. Someone then presents that in a segment of clips totalling 2 minutes long. You don't think you'd be able to distinguish between the original and the edited version of the footage?

The whole leftist agenda is to discredit not just Trump but anyone else who decides to follow in Trump’s footsteps. The Leftists are afraid that, after decades of New World Order successes (e.g., globalism, unchecked immigration), Trump’s ideas will spread and undo the New World Order framework that the Left has carefully built. The leftists are panicking (so much so that I’ll bet many of them have trouble sleeping at night). Trump’s ideas must be portrayed by the Left as “illegitimate” and “extreme”; everything Trump does must be criticized and ridiculed.

Or at least less edited.

Have you heard of the concept of Metropolitan Area? It's this fancy concept that probably hasn't permeated the 18th century world that conservatives live in.

Here in modern times, that is what we consider a cities political radius. You won't find many vocal Trump supporters in the MA of any major American city. And no, Bumfark, Alabama does not count as a major city.

And so the pendulum swings

a victory? i see no victory for the left in this

>leftist
>Leftists
>Left
>Left
>Left leftists
>Left
>I’ll bet many of them have trouble sleeping at night

...

...