There are people in 2017 who reject Marxism

>there are people in 2017 who reject Marxism
Wew
Actually studying about foreign countries cultures and histories convinced me that historical materialism is the only true sociology theory.

Other urls found in this thread:

independent.co.uk/news/science/fury-at-dna-pioneers-theory-africans-are-less-intelligent-than-westerners-394898.html
youtube.com/watch?v=LCZinX209rA
bigstory.ap.org/article/a7038453c4234c1eb3bb026a355245d4/cuba-legalize-small-and-medium-sized-private-businesses
cbc.ca/beta/news/world/cuba-capitalism-economy-entrepreneur-socialist-communist-1.3509852
scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/normal_countries_draft_sept_12_annotated.pdf
vietrade.gov.vn/en/index.php?option=com_content&id=2256:achievements-of-viet-nam-doi-moi-policy-&Itemid=287
youtube.com/watch?v=G136GODWKhc
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Wrong board try Sup Forums or /his/

Second cold war when, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Do you have a higher iq and education than a geneticist Nobel prize winner and the founder of DNA?

independent.co.uk/news/science/fury-at-dna-pioneers-theory-africans-are-less-intelligent-than-westerners-394898.html
One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London.

The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.

Do you have a higher iq and education than a geneticist Nobel prize winner and the founder of DNA?

Our posterity will never forget him, for not betraying us in our time of dying, we can not forget our heroes or we have no one to look up to.

youtube.com/watch?v=LCZinX209rA

Your ideology is an unprecedented disaster. All of your countries either collapse or transition back to capitalism eventually with China (deng xiaoping) and Vietbam (doi moi) being notable examples.

Even Cuba is starting to go back to capitalism by legalizing private businesses and private property again.

bigstory.ap.org/article/a7038453c4234c1eb3bb026a355245d4/cuba-legalize-small-and-medium-sized-private-businesses

cbc.ca/beta/news/world/cuba-capitalism-economy-entrepreneur-socialist-communist-1.3509852

Out of all economic systems, capitalism has the least flaws. This is why every developed country and rich one are all capitalist, even Nordic nations that socialists dick suck so much, 90% of companies in Sweden are privately owned, 5% are state-owned and only 5% worker cooperatives (where the workers actually own the means of production).

Such a sad and failed system. Fuck off back to leftypolshit where you belong.

>getting b8ed

...

Watson knows more about race, genetics, dna than Marx.

Yeah that's where this bad b8 belongs

...

>

Wait, how is genetic IQ related to historical materialism? Is the yank confusing liberalism and the left again?

Their natural beliefs were incorrect, that's like saying that we must distribute means of production but also sterilize everyone and suicide.

If you get the fundamentals incorrect such as race and DNA changing overtime then you get an abomination.

...

...

>

>those angles
>skulls unlimited.com
>broken skulls for black people - intact ones for whites

Everytime

>Trostsky the jew stopped by jews
Mmmm

>Muh poor nazis didn't do nuffin
>it-it was poles who started it I swear
>Nazi Germany was totally awesome guise, what are this "corruption" you're talking about

this better?

...

I have been seeing this autist posting that paste since the morning. Many anons have debunked your shit already, but I would still remind you that majority of anthropologist studies have proven racial theories wrong, and this mister is genetist, not an anthropologist. He also didn't backed his words with any studies. It's not his field of competence. Genetists research human genes and their functions, anthropologists are those who study human populations, using genetics as a tool.
The main problem of communist regimes of 21st century was that everyone tried to create socialism unnaturaly, before the basis for it was formed. They did it too early, hoping they would take the power, establish socialist superstructure and develop basis rapidly for this superstructure. Of course all that hasn't worked, but it doesn't deny the fact that Marxism is correct. As basis is developed enough, superstructure would be changed by the laws of human history. And we are on a brim of it with automatization of labor and computer technologies taking over.
I do not understand why do you think that single scientist statement (about not his field of studies), which has been proven wrong multiple times by other scientists, is a truth.

>Artistic depiction
Lel
Look for pic related. He's definitely different than Euros, but he's not as abhuman as your caricatures make it out to be.

Pic related. Fuck off back to heftylol.

All collapsed poverty ridden shitholes.

>ezln

Top fucking kek. Chiapas is the poorest and shitties state in Mexico. Their residents keep fleeing to the richer capitalist states.

The main problem is that your argument is bullshit. Abolishing private businesses and private property is economic suicide, hence why your regimes collapse on themselves or go back to capitalism eventually.

>Abolishing private businesses and private property is economic suicide
Ideology intensify

Also,
>Sup Forumssters criticising people on autism on looks
Go back to worship some script kiddies

>socialist states exist in a vacuum
>they are not affected by capitalist regimes
>they do not exist in a world dominated by market economics

hmm

anyway communism has never even been close to attempted, the closest thing would probably be small isolated communities and the paris commune

Lol, I have read your pic and it's full of retarded flaws.
1) Pic with queue in Leninism part depicts pre-revolution Russia (captions are in pre-revolutionary orthography).
2)Postmodernism is closely linked to neoliberalism, not a Neomarxism or Marxism at all. Classics of postmodernism were/are all either liberals or apolitical people. Fukuyama is a great example. Neomarxism is mostly about cultural issues, it was popular in 50s-70s, postmodernism became popular in 80s. Neomarxism is pretty much dead now.
3) Multiculturalism was about different cultures living together not mixing, while living in the same country. Explanation of multiculturalism in your pic is actually an explanation of melting pot, pretty much the opposite of multiculturalism. Also pretty much everywhere in the world the melting pot conception is popular now, multiculturalism has died in the early 00s.

>implying capitalism isn't collapsing already

he is exactly like the pictures, you retarded nigger.

Inability to distinguish faces is a common symptom of autism.

Inability to see niggers how they are is a symptom of being a nigger.

>Abolishing private businesses and private property is economic suicide
In Soviet Union life quality has skyrocketed compared to tsar era. We destroyed illiteracy in 5 years, provided all the country with the electricity, than we created such an industry which was able to defeat Hitler. Also free and high quality education and free medicine, in 50s everyone became provided with his own flat for free, we launched man into space and in 70s we were #26 by HDI. We have risen from India tier shithole to world superpower.
Racists always post ugly black people, you should get it. It's a part of propaganda. During WWII Germans depicted Russians as ugly Asians while majority of us don't have distinct Asian traits.

>implying it is

>nigger nigger
Dude you're so clever lmao
#praisekek

But seriously
If you think and look the same you might want to go see a doctor
>not the same lips
>not the same jaw
>not the same facial structure

Landau and Lifshitz physics books as well as the Encyclopedia Mathematica show that the Soviet Union was equal or greater to the USA in scientific power.

1) You post only ugly black people.
2) Even if all the black people were ugly it's not a reason to diminish their rights or make up retarded racial theories. Judging people by their face features is 3rd grade autism.

>>Sup Forumssters criticising people on autism on looks
>Go back to worship some script kiddies

Also what do you mean by this? Commies literally universally look like faggots in the 21st century

If you are normalized to see niggers as "human" it's because you are a nigger.

>look mom, I posted again a damaged, broken skull from a an internet archive ! I'm so, so clever haha

Well, many countries prefer our weapons to American ones despite any industry except military is ruined here, science is absolutely ruined with all the scientists moving to the West massively. Soviet science was great. You can't maintain huge space program without solid scientific basis.

...

Are you autistic, retarded or nigger?
ignore the first 2 if you're the third.

Holy fick go back to watching retarded memes like Zizek who is the Molyneaux of the left.

It had nothing to do with ideology you moron, but flatout empirical evidence. All communist nations collapse or go back to fucking capitalism when their economy starts to stagnate for decades without an end. As was the case with Maoist China being such a huge failure.

And now quality of life in Russia is better than at any point in the USSR.

scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/normal_countries_draft_sept_12_annotated.pdf

China switched to capitalism in the late 70s by legalizing private businesses, private property and allowing foreign companies to start operations in China and invest in it, the result as been this.

>China's economic growth since the reform has been very rapid, exceeding the East Asian Tigers. Economists estimate China's GDP growth from 1978 to 2013 at between 9.5% to around 11.5% a year. Since the beginning of Deng Xiaoping's reforms, China's GDP has risen tenfold.[28] The increase in total factor productivity (TFP) was the most important factor, with productivity accounting for 40.1% of the GDP increase, compared with a decline of 13.2% for the period 1957 to 1978—the height of Maoist policies. For the period 1978–2005, Chinese GDP per capita increased from 2.7% to 15.7% of U.S. GDP per capita, and from 53.7% to 188.5% of Indian GDP per capita. Per capita incomes grew at 6.6% a year.[29] Average wages rose sixfold between 1978 and 2005,[30] while absolute poverty declined from 41% of the population to 5% from 1978 to 2001.[31]

A decline in absolute poverty rates from a whopping 41% under socialism to 5% under capitalism. That's 500 million Chinese out of poverty thanks to capitalism.

post of your superrior white face then kek.

If you do not consider black people a part of Homo Sapiens species you're idiot. If two species can mix with their offspring being fertile, than it's a single species.
What do you mean by this? Your political views do not affect your appearance.

Neandethals are same species as well then.

Vietnam did the same thing with Doi Moi in the late 80s, again, legalized private businesses, private property and allowed foreign companies to begin operations in their country. The result has been:

>
Viet Nam poverty reduction rate has been improved unceasingly for a long period, with a very impressive rate of 2% per year. Thanks to the rapid growth rate, in only two decades, nearly 30 million people were lifted out of poverty

Thirty million Vietnamese out of poverty compared to the failed stagnating socialist economy before the reforms.

Marx is a fucking charlatan.

What the hell is your problem ? The skulls you post are DAMAGED. They look ugly because they ARE damaged and broken.

again pic related looks like the skull I posted, look at her simean face.

forgot link

vietrade.gov.vn/en/index.php?option=com_content&id=2256:achievements-of-viet-nam-doi-moi-policy-&Itemid=287

You retarded fucking nigger, the skull is a perfect match to the nigger.

The main problem I have with capitalism is that people replace morality in their lives with rational self-interest. But, I also believe the possibility (not necessarily the actuality) of a free market is necessary for a people to be considered free.

Why you hide photo of your ugly face?

>citing a horror story writer as a scientific proof
What's wrong with you?
>And now quality of life in Russia is better than at any point in the USSR
>let me tell about your country
Quality of life in Russia now is way lower than in many USSR periods. In 60s-80s we were on par with Eastern Europe. Now we are Latin America tier. Maybe our life quality was higher than in USSR in 00s thanks to oil, but not now absolutely.

Of course, there needs to be a balance between freedom to trade, own and such and not having a society dominated by individualistic materialism forsaking everything that animated them.

...

here is without photoshop.

How about this, you leave me with my truth of racial purity, race mattering etc.. and I'll leave you will all the niggers you want.

It isn't though. It comes from a stock image website and it doesn't fit. The teeth, mainly.

Go back to your national commie board, Rucka CBNHNR!

I can't tell difference of man chimp or woman chimp either, nor do I care about the distinction other than getting the chimps out of the streets and roads and into zoos or in their natural habitat.

I just linked a study you communist moronic byldo trash.

LOL. this Ruskie pig is still burning from yesterdays epic fail.

>china
>vietnam
Of course socialism didn't work there, they were agrarian societies. Mao idea of creating a basis by agriculture was retarded and obviously contradicted Marxist idea of developing means of production. I don't know much about Vietnam but I guess they had problems with industrializing the country after their country was ruined by USA.
Chinese government transferred to capitalism to create a basis for transfer to socialism first, and than create socialism. It's highly logical and Marxist.

I agree, though it needs to be developed further.
We need neomarxism but not the kind which would lead to denial of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin but the kind which would elaborate the conception deeper with all new results, facts and expiriences we have now.

but we wan't see photo of your beautiful white face. Why you just don't post your photo as ultimate proof of white superriority?

>TFW this b8 always gets yous

>it's highly logical because they were agrarian

So was fucking tsarist Russia and you cite the USSR as being successful. Stay consistent.

What about Cuba starting to go back to capitalism? See links here
Did God Almighty Marx predict that too?

...

tsarist russia had industrial bases in its major cities though

western russia was in the process of industrialisation at the time of the revolution

>they haf industrial bases in the cities though

So did Maoist China by the time Deng Xiaoping implemented the 1978 reforms to change the economy into a capitalist one.

Yeah, but actually Neomarxism therm is reserved already (50s-70s school of thought criticizing mass culture). Actually the biggest problem with communism now that majority of proletariat are service workers pretty much everywhere now, and service sector outnumbering the industrial will be a thing up to socialism as labor automatization is developing. Yet most of communists can't change the rhetorics and talk about workers mostly. Second problem is that in the West there are almost no real left parties after 1991, most of them are barely social democrats now and all they talk about are social issues, often absolutely irrelevant.
Cockhole, please
They were extremely close to us, but not all the offspring was fertile.

>tsarist russia had industrial bases in its major cities though
That's saying little.

youtube.com/watch?v=G136GODWKhc

America it to blame desu.
You failed to destroy commie Russia completely and now you have the result and shit

Cool down, "white" "european".

ok thats 60 years after the russian revolution though, lenin took over an industrial nation, mao an agricultural one, hence the divergence in ideology

>I just linked a study
Shit, compare USSR HDI to our modern one.
>So was fucking tsarist Russia and you cite the USSR as being successful
USSR managed to industrialize the country unlike Chinese or Viets did.
Also
>What about Cuba starting to go back to capitalism?
I've said in the beggining of the thread that the main problem of communism is that party taking over the country doesn't have enough time to develop basis as much as it needed for basis to coincide with superstructure of society. Party elites are becoming corrupted, and plan economy on that stage is less effective than capitalist one. But with automatization of labour and IT we see now make socialism a close perspective.
Yet communists achieved a great results, look at USSR.
>Marx predict that too
Marx predicted that revolution would happen in the most developed country when basis becomes too developed for capitalist superstructure. It's going to happen in the future.

there are communist parties, they just get 500 votes

>USSR managed to industrialize the country unlike Chinese or Viets did.
That's soviet propaganda.

? We aren't European, and we are mostly white while many people have some Asian traits as we are heavily mixed.
You can't call Tsar Russia an industrial nation, 80% of population were peasants, literacy was kinda like 15% and so. Yet we had industry, owned mostly by foreign companies (first steps of globalization btw) and we were half colony of Europe.

Гюлчaтaй - oткpoй личикo! Hy cкoлькo мoжнo пpятaть cвoю бoгoпoдoбнyю хapийcкyю внeшнocть oт oбщecтвeннocти?

>That's soviet propaganda
Shit, are you retarded? 99% of industry here was built in USSR. Stalin has created industrial basis enough to destroy Nazis who had all the European industry under their rule.

russia had millions of people employed in heavy industries by 1910

it was industrial. not 100% obviously

>>Stalin has created industrial basis enough to destroy Nazis who had all the European industry under their rule.
>land
>lend-lease
>wnter
>men
>fuel
>munitions

any of these things are more important than stalin for the great patriotic war

I'm wondering if you're pretended to be retarded.

All these industries were owned by Germans, Brits or Frenchmen. Russia was little more than a industrial colony.

>All these industries were owned by Germans, Brits or Frenchmen
Where do you get this thought from?
Russia was at war with Germany.

But this is irrelevant. Even with thoae industrialized areas, China was very poor and in constant stagnation until they became capitalist.

>shit compare ussr hdi to modern one

???
Read the study, it's looking at multiple socioeconomic factors you idiot.

>ussr managed to industralize the country unlike china and vietnam did
>j-just ignore all these other failures comrade

The USSR had a much lower standard than all of capitalist Europe. Quality of life in Russia is now better than at ANY point during the USSR.

scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/normal_countries_draft_sept_12_annotated.pdf

You're a retard.

Cuba has been under communist rule for multiple decades now. Batista's Cuba was quite industralized compared to many other Latin American countries at the same time.

Automation is not going to kill capitalism you idiot, jobs just shift to other sectors. Automation has existed for multiole decades now.

There will be no revolution in the future. Capitalism continues to get stronger, not weaker. The beauty of capitalism is that it is so malleable and resilient. It is better at adapting to changing times and newet technologies while socialism isn't, hence the collapses or transitions back to capitalism. You bring up corruption which undermined communist countries, yet you don't realize that this is an argument for me. Communism is the biggest utopian ideology there is.

I'm going to bed because you offer nothing of substance. Marx predicted that the UK would become socialist due to the industrial revolution, it didn't. Many of his predictions have failed to materalize.

From an actual history book. And I'm talking of 1910's.

>we are mostly white
>we are heavily mixed

>From an actual history book.
What history book, and what evidence?

I'm a Marxist.

>You can't call Tsar Russia an industrial nation
They were as industrial as anywhere else.
38% of french population today is rural in past it would have been higher.

La Révolution Industrielle, Jean-Pierre Rioux.
It talks about why Russia/Italy/Spain were not able to fully industralise, unlike France/Germany/Britain.

Rioux is a renomed historian.

Stupidity, no proof.

Pidoruskie are too brainwashed on that, will deny.

>Here is

>And now quality of life in Russia is better than at any point in the USSR.

stopped right there

>Live in a socialist state
>People literally don't don't who Marx and Stalin are, and have a very little knowledge of Lennin

WE
WUZ
COMMIES
AND
SHIETZ

tbqf vietnam is very capitalist now lol

Prove him wrong then