According to two of Trump's appointees...

According to two of Trump's appointees, their current plan for economic prosperity will include a stimulus for the 2018 tax season that amounts to a $1,675 credit to every citizen who actually receives a W-2 and files their return.

The guy's basically giving every citizen (legal and paying taxes, ie anyone with a job) cold hard cash of $1,675.00 in 2018.

What's your reason for not liking him again?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007–2008
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_crisis
youtube.com/watch?v=HxtVorLYnds
twitter.com/AnonBabble

"He uses upsetting launguage in our safe space"

because I recognize when I'm being fed scraps while the rich get the feast.

Oh no not upsetting language!

So you won't be happy until you take someone else's money? You sound about half retarded.

if you're taking money from the government like OP described, you are taking someone else's money. You sound about full retard.

...

But you're already talking about taking someone else's money it's just not enough of their money for you to be happy. Will you be mailing your tax return back and not cashing the check then since you claim to feel so passionate about your "beliefs"? Surely you wouldn't want to be part of the problem and deposit the check.

You clearly don't know what a strawman is because you used it entirely wrong in the context of the conversation. Back to 7th grade with you kid, bus is on the way.

oh sure, and we'll both stop enjoying any public service because it was paid for by other people's money.

Just go back to bed kid.

I didn't say anything about public service, I'm talking about the check you receive. I know you won't send it back and stand on your beliefs, we both know you'll cash it and spend it because you're a hypocrite.

a strawman argument is arguing a position the original person has not taken. The strawman faggot argued that I would not be happy unless I was taking other people's money. What I clearly said is that I will not be fooled by being given a little money by Trump when he's saving the huge gifts for the rich elite like himself.

You clearly don't know what a strawman is because you used it entirely wrong in the context of the conversation. Since you also fail at reading comprehension, back to 4th grade with you kid, bus is on the way.

of course not, but by your "logic" we should accept any amount of tax breaks to the rich as long as we get a few pennies. Fuck, why not make their tax rate 1% as long as Trump sends us a nickel.

>t. jealous poor fag

Get a job hippy

At what point did I imply or say that we had to accept "any amount of tax breaks to the rich"?

You're literally creating some boogeyman scenario to try and sound half sane. I never said or implied that at all.

I actually make plenty, but I also don't bend over backwards for the rich.

But I suppose some serfs feel compelled to defend their lords.

haha you are a fucking idiot, you arent being fed scraps, at least not any less than you were under obama you fucking regressive cuck

>The misappropriation of an srguement or vague rewording of an argument to misrepresent someone's stance and make it easier to deconstruct.
The US Government (regardless of administration) has been in the pocket of the central bank and I sin favour of their practices. Go and learn how your countries economy actually fucking works before you start trying to call others out on their correct use of highlighting your shitty logical-fallacy ridden arguments.
The wealth of the Us does not belong to "the people" and never will, Trump is particularly interested in ensuring the rich stay rich and the working poor become ever poorer in both monetary wealth and wealth of living standards. IMMIGRATION and DA MEXICANS and any other fear politics about the terrorists who are "COMING TO GET YOU" or other ridiculous shit are just smokescreens to allow him to perpetuate what capital driven governments have done for years.
Keep the peasants in their place.

by saying if I accept trump's check (pennies), I cannot complain about the YUUUUGE tax breaks planned for the rich. Try to keep up child.

I don't know if I should really value the opinion of anyone that is super impressed by $1,675.

this guy gets it

>I just heard some older kids talk about karl marx for the first time and hope i sound cool saying "serfs" although my statement as a whole makes no fucking sense

>super impressed
nah my nigga i aint, but getting a months worth of free rent, i wont complain

Yes it is scraps when the rich are getting a feast . Context is important boy. I know your natural inclination is to defend the wealthy as a weak peasant, but please try to think for yourself.

You clearly have a glorious absence of education if you're going to call someone a retard for their statement and then say "well no, you are actually right but OBAMA DID IT TOO" who the fuck said anything about Obama? The entire Is government is a fucking long con designed to keep feeding you scraps regardless of which shitlord is POTUS. Fucking dumbass

At what point did I say I was "super impressed" by $1,675? You sound like a shill that can't make a point without literally putting words in someone else's mouth.

I inherited all mine but still my parents had to work for it, so it's a deserved family thing. I can't stand these communist scumbags who want to tax the rich up to the hilt, scrounging rabble.

Communism

>thinks giving the rich a tax break = communism
Fox News isn't the only channel for news kid.

Save some straw for the barn kiddo.

Because I am not a poor hopeless faggot that thinks 1600 dollars makes up for his overwhelming negative qualities.

I don't think Reddit is all that bad though.

define communism

The entire premise of this thread is that getting $1,675 is somehow noteworthy and warrants some praise for Trump. So there are people here whose opinions would actually be swayed by $1,675.

who says the rich are getting the long end of the stick here? it says in the op that *you* get more money, do i think the rich should pull more of the weight? absolutely no one needs 10's of millions

maybe, just maybe people shouldnt cry "fuck trump" when everyone else does it. regressive cuck confirmed

the point of this thread is designed to show how gloriously magnanimous Trump is by giving out 1675, which is pathetic just like you.

>to a $1,675 credit

How much of a credit do I get if I earn $20M in capital gains this year?

Nice trips

MY POINT is that the rich should pay more, I think you're misfiring there champ.

Everyone is equal, everything is shared, it's bullshit and ruins things for people who want to get ahead

Again, where in my post did it say anything about the rich getting massive tax breaks? You're literally creating a fairy tale. Aren't you commie faggots about equality? Are you implying they don't deserve to get the same tax credit as you (despite them being citizens just like you) just because of the numbers in their bank account? You sound like a straight up idiot and, again, you're showing what a hypocrite you are.

>waaaa give us free money!
>but don't give those other citizens free money because i say so!

fuckin pleb and a half over here.

and i agree with that. but i dont see why you are against leveling the playing field a little. it wasnt stated where the money was coming from, so given that, getting more money for the regular american to spend is, imo a good thing

only a retard would take this at face value and have it sway their opinion positively of trump. you don't think that's the goal of his little "stimulus"?

Hold on while I cry a fucking river because a preteen on the internet called me a word he doesn't even have the mental capacity to grasp.

See retard? Other people can imply out of their asses without contributing anything too.

Trump isn't the problem, dumbasses like you are that idolise without education and raise up those who don't need nor care for your white knight desperation on to little pedestals you've built up from your own shit.

The only thing confirmed here is that you're not smart enough to wipe the dribble from your own chin before speaking.

this guy gets it, people are making up so much shit itt

>MY POINT is that the rich should pay more

Why the hell should they? Do you think a rich guy should pay more for a pint of milk than a welfare scrounger?

>because I recognize when I'm being fed scraps while the rich get the feast.
Rich actually work A LOT for their money.
I have seen the rich who don't know who the Beatles are for example.
because their passion is wrk and money.

so unless you are willing to make sacrifices to your lazy lifestyle, don't blame the rich. Blame yourself.

Be thankful you are fed anything at all.

And obama did the exact same thing. Pot calling the kettle black much? If it matters to you now, why did you cash the check that obama gave you? Surely you're not talking out of both sides of your mouth, right?

my god...you again?
you must be some kind of triggered cuck lurking in all the political threads

ha, nice comeback, i have my MSc so there goes that.

i just find it so fun that you are all "trump is the devil". you didnt imply anything in that post that even remotely addressed the argument.

people will pay that in penalty if they have not had forced insurance these years so idk, seems ok for them

>cut regulations for corporations
>lower tax rates for companies
>issue stimulus tax package to americans
>dumb americans spend their "extra" cash instead of investing
>companies make increased profits from their bigger tax breaks and lower regulations
>rich get richer
>majority of the population paid off for pennies on the dollar

>federal benefit programs vs HERE MUNEE PLZ NO HATE MEEEE
>implying i need federal benefits

now look, i know you need to impress your middle school buddies by showing how you stuck it to the socialists and welfare lovers on the internet, but maybe we should learn some economics and political theory before we embarrass ourselves, love?

hes right though, its an ideal that wont happen before the day that all work has been automated. before that there will always be the most basic economic principles: supply and demand, and growth.
but go on, all the other forms of communism just wasnt the right kind of communism, you have it all figured out havent you?

Yeah, man, that sort of thing worked out so well for W.

I didn't say anything about federal programs. You clearly haven't been paying taxes long. Obama did literally the exact same thing in 2010.

Stop trying to act like you're older than 12 when the last president did literally the same thing with tax returns and now you're saying Trump's somehow wrong for doing the exact same thing. You sound corny, you sound uneducated, and you don't sound like you have a job honestly.

you don't remember the economic tax stimulus of 2008 where lots of people got a check for $300?

that's table scraps, THANKS OBAMA!

...

because my support isn't bought, and a shiny check doesn't distract me from all of the horrifying qualities that make him and his team unfit for the white house

BUT ITS TRUMP SO ITS DIFFERENT

oh, well that's OK then.

>b-b-b-because he's still a mean-mean dummy head who said some mean things and i don't work so i don't get the $1,675 cash like everyone else who has a job

>i-i-it's not faaaaaaaaiiiirr!

Shameless samefagging

...

>gets presented with a solid reason
>responds with complete mockery

yep, you clearly make a valid argument in defense.

Your a kike and your ruse is retarded

>presents opinions of a poopoohead
so are you gonna give the 1675 back or should i give you a paypal so i can rid you of those devil money

so i'm just supposed to follow him blindly because MURCIN PRIEDDDD, then? long live the king?

Kys

nah, you'll get the money eventually.
it'll come in forms of small payments of about $20 through your mother on a bi weekly basis.

* buzzer sound *

>I like you if you give me free money
Congratulations, faggot. You are now officially part of the democrats base.

oh you got me there. i take it you are keeping them then? what a waste of money

im sure, since youd be spending them on her since you arent getting anything anywhere else

This never happened. First, Obama wasn't president until 2009. And second, it was like in 2003 or some shit. Kill yourself.

i love you

Well, Trump says the media is a lie.

So this is obviously fake.

no, the economic stimulus plan of 2008 did give some people a check for $300. but i did have the date wrong for who was president at the time, my bad.

Yay more budget shortfalls!

Typical republican: run up the deficit and let democrats fix the economy for 8 years, then go break it again

"According"

Cite your source, no source? Then you are full of trumps cum

>being so poor $1600 means shit to you

Cucks can't buy shit for $1600. Get a real job and earn $1600 more a week.

>Typical republican

>National debt when obama entered office $10 Trillion

>National debt when obama left office $20 trillion

>More than all previous presidents combined

Sure thing, kid.

...

Obama inherited a disastrous financial crisis and was able to not only keep things afloat but actually was able to turn unemployment around towards one of the lowest rates it's ever been

all the while he didn't spend his time bitching about what a bad situation he inherited

>Obama inherited a disastrous financial crisis

Source?

claiming the media is fake is just a pathetic excuse to keep believing the bullshit trump feeds you despite the facts presented to you

what's it like living in fairyland, where big donny blows glitter up your ass every day? does the funny feeling make you giggle?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession

2000s babbies won't remember this

Dont bother, these trumptards believe in bullshit that "someone" said with no source to back up claims. Just ignore and when they dont get shit, laugh.

You seriously cannot be this fucking retarded

pic extremely related

>wiki
>my source is wiki

my sides lol

were you living under a rock in 2007 or are you underaged?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007–2008
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_crisis

here's some more homework just in case those facts aren't fact enough for you

>turned unemployment around

>by not counting half the people who were actually unemployed after 18 months

Yeah, I can cut the trash in my dumpster in half if I stop counting the bags at the bottom that have been in the dumpster more than two weeks. Doesn't make the dumpster any less full that's just refusing to face reality, you massive idiot.

debating with regressives on here is like trying to make sense of these niggers. and they won some goddamned national price for their speech impediments
youtube.com/watch?v=HxtVorLYnds

So no source then

Fake news garbage, anyone can edit wikipedia

>i no believe wiki
>i no believe media

who will you believe, then? or are you just going to ad hominem every source that's presented?

source - history

>were you living under a rock in 2007 or are you underaged?

Translation, I have no source for my bullshit claims

lol

>still no source, all deflection

I smell a rat.. lol

it happened mate, you can't just pretend it didn't

don't strain yourself too much trying to make a bullshit counterargument, you might have a stroke. then you wouldn't be able to pay your hospital bills cuz you didn't need no damn socialist health insurance!