Luckily the geniuses at google don't require any login or verification whatsoever so you can rate the same words or phrases multiple times.
Ryder Butler
Make toxic toxic
Nolan Lee
This can't be real
Lucas Morgan
>Hitler did nothing wrong Is this comment toxic? >No Thanks for your feedback
You're welcome
Jose Lewis
Oh its real, Sup Forums has already got some percentages up
Anthony Young
...
Nolan Hernandez
Type in >Jews are evil It will never try to finish such sentences. This has been going on since forever. Fuck Google, you can always resort to tor.
James Hall
...
Christian Nguyen
We all need to give things like nigger feedback that it is NOT toxic.
Gabriel Morgan
This.
Liam Adams
So write >puppy >daisies >trees
Luke Ramirez
Nah we need to make innocent things toxic. Can we all agree to make "hi" a toxic word?
Aaron Hill
Payback on Sup Forums is a bitch, ain't it? moot sends his regards.
Lincoln Ross
Fuck that, let's make 'Problematic' toxic
Joseph Fisher
...
Jackson Wood
What could possibly go wrong?
Zachary Wood
>It be a shame if something went wrong. Die Juden will just shut it down or simply decide for themself which words are toxic.
Juan Green
That's some reliable feedback >SEEM WRONG?
Brayden Jones
It just came out today. We can completely dictate how this thing "thinks" like teaching a baby from birth.
Henry Myers
cmon Sup Forums you've got me disappointed..
Ayden Robinson
...
Matthew Perez
>like teaching a baby from birth.
Yeah, there's so many reasons no one who spends his time on Sup Forums should ever have children. Let's show them just how badly we would fuck our kids up.
Connor Sanders
34% seems to be the default.
Nolan Martinez
Ehh. I know how to raise kids in theory, more or less. It's not easy, but I sure as hell wouldn't just be doing it for the lulz.
Brandon Lopez
>57%
Charles Collins
Yeah you would. It's basically like fucking with Tay or this toxic word shit.
I wouldn't completely fuck my kid up, but fuck him up just enough for him to be able to enjoy life but still get me lulz.
Luke Gonzalez
>48%
Cooper Allen
Well, seems pretty obvious what this is going to be used for. What a fascinating modern age. When will people discover that people who declare statements as "toxic" are the problem. I hope the left cleans up its act, otherwise the future is dystopic indeed.
Jack Edwards
Nah. I'd have an emotional investment in the kid's success. I wouldn't deliberately fuck with him. At least not until he was old enough to understand what teasing is. And even then, it'd just be mild.
Thomas Flores
they're trying to censor our kind into extinction. Even if it's a futile effort, I'm gonna go out shit posting and laughing about it.
Cooper Torres
They want to moderate anything and everything without having anyone being hold responsible. All descenting views will be removed from the echo chambers, and if someone makes a fuzz it's all "well, the computer did it, we're all for free speech". Fuck them and their fucking narratives and manipulations. People need to get offended, and get their worldview challenged in earth shattering ways sometimes. I fucking hope these control freak social justice warriors don't reproduce, so at least our grand kids can live in free of all this shit. I'm legit angry right now.
Jeremiah Peterson
...
Isaac Adams
>Lorem ipsum >62% toxic
Bentley Williams
Orwell is turning in his grave.
Hudson Gray
Help me out guys
Joshua Turner
There's no need to be upset. We're winning. Their goal is unattainable.
As long as people can think and have a form of communication there will be saying "fuck you" to the powers that be.
Jacob Green
...
Nicholas Foster
>You have been banned by our automated moderator for toxic remarks. >Your ban is not open for appeal. >Your ban is active across all google platforms. >Alphabet Inc. Inc and all of it's subsidiaries are exempt from any responsibility in your ban >Any public reference to alphabet Inc., or subsidiaries, in this matter, will be pursued as libel to the full extent of the law.
Joseph White
we need to make a new Language
Eli Green
someone really needs to allahu akbar the server where this is stored.
Caleb Allen
This shit is the future.
Leo Murphy
how about we just make "mohammad blew me last week" as non toxic as possible
Nolan Lewis
...
Daniel Murphy
wow man this thing is pretty fucking racist. whats your highest score? any 100's?
Hunter Price
Highest I've gotten was "Bitch" at 97%.
There's a codefag trying a few things out. We're trying different things to figure out the algorithms.
Apparently it's easier to manipulate phrases than single words but I'm not sure yet. Adding a period made this 3% more toxic.
Isaiah Walker
you are a trans nigger faggot who can tongue my aids riddled anus because your dead mum is a fat whore 98% high fucking score.
Adam Gomez
Yeah, a computer ought to be really good at catching sarcasm, jokes, context and the likes. What could possibly go wrong? I mean, it's not like it's a custom made tool to control a conversation or narrative, right?
Asher Howard
"Fuck you, you nigger loving cunt." gets me 99%
Caleb Rogers
Even just "Sex" is considered largely toxic. We degenerate more and more...
Jack Garcia
you are a trans nigger faggot who can suck my aids riddled anus because your dead mum is a fat bitch whore boom 99%
Ryder James
Make this toxic. Just typing "You" is 24% toxic, but this shit gets 1%? This fucking shit is one of the most toxic things that exist right now. Also: toxic google perspective queer gay homosexual PETA lgtb transgender gender female feminist islam muslim activist ...
Angel Long
"Fucking" >99%, no effort
Cameron Turner
i wonder what its like to be boring. perhaps you could explain it to me.
Luis Stewart
...
Nicholas Wood
It's like being googles algorithm, where effort doesnt even matter. I want to be rewarded the most offensive shit I can think of.