What does this mean? Am I a terrible person? I know nothing of politics

What does this mean? Am I a terrible person? I know nothing of politics

It's what most people seem to get if not a little farther to the right.

take spekr, its a much better test, i got similar results from that test but this is what spekr gave me and i agree with it far more than moderate lefty

...

to be fair i was a lot further down then you on political compass.org

...

>Anarchic-Socialism
that isn't even possible. I don't get these far left cucks

>how's antifa? are they treating your student ass nice?
>keep telling your self its okay to hurt your political enemy's because ideas hurt people some how

I agree there. Spekr seems less loaded. Political Compass has a leftist bias. Though I still am roughly the same anyway.

Helps to have an actual understanding of the theory behind the Ideologies beyond what you were taught in school

Fucking moderate

calm down son.

>abolition of the state
>economic restrictions
choose one
>Socialism
People will always want more because its how people work, if you have a commune or society were people take as they "need" and give as they "can" it becomes people taking what they "can" and giving what they "need" and falls apart, give me one example of this not being true.

It means you picked some decent principles on governance.

Comrade? I'm the guy above you

...

...

>480x400
is Sup Forums politics just people who got their arguments destroyed on >>Sup Forums so they choose give up and talk about it on Sup Forums instead?

>Am I a terrible person?

Yes.

>I know nothing of politics

obviously

...

Spekr makes me feel even dumber when answering those questions. I'm almost the same though

yea most centrist don't really know or care any thing of politics, the only reason i got into politics myself because the SJW cucks pissed me off and i looked into it more than that i find it fun chuckling at commies who think this time is different. idk i find it interesting, you don't have too but you might like it .

Just took spekr

It could be much worse user.

Sup Forums reporting.

The past few days, sjw have been less of a meme and more of an annoyance to me so I've been starting to get into it. The extreme left seems to be worse than the extreme right atm

...

its because they are,the way i got into it was by watching polictal stuff on youtube and other open platforms, like sargon of akkad for a lefty sjw hater, louder with crowder for a righty, stuff like that. if you do that get stuff from both sides because you might find an argument that blows yours out of the water. i used to be slight of left until my arguments got destroyed.

Yeah, its a load of hot gas. I just hope daddy Donald will turn a few things around.

I think that's the perfect way to think. You go on CNN and get your ass blasted with libtard nonsense and you go on Fox and contract autism.

I hope he does aswell but i don't know if he can, the libs are trying to defame the right so they can get control in 2018 and impeach trump. thats what im seeing with this crazy campaign against people like Milo

I know alot about politics and we would agree on alot of things.

If they impeach Trump, they have to deal with an even worse president. Trump smartly picked a VP where if he goes, shit gets worse so you stick with him

>i know alot
>almost authoritarian

...

Classical Liberal reporting in.

why aren't you libertarian?
i've met a lot of classical liberals and have turned them more libertarian.

r8 me m8s

Funny that AnCaps support the actions of a brutal fascist government.
>implying AnCaps aren't secretly fascist in the first place

at least you're not left

...

Agreed
5/10

>abolition of the state
good meme

>not being 3/4 down the mid line

plebs all of you

What the fuck is activism?

college underclassman/10

The only sane person here.
If you lean even a bit to the left just kill yourself. This especially applies to the anarchofags that roleplay as edgy revolutionaries and to the berniecucks that think that old communist dumb fuck would actually give your entitled ass everything for free by taking it from "DA 1 PACENT, DA BILLIONAZZ AND DA MILLIONAZZ" while he himself has 3 houses. Friendly reminder, without the 1% you wouldn't have a job faggots but oh wait you probably actually don't anyway. Grow up.

My dude

I'm one off lol

It means you shouldnt be bothered with identifying with useless ideologies.

They can't. Don't try to reason with these braindead people, it's a waste of time. They don't live in the real world and don't want to.

Except that there are communes all around the world that function perfectly well.

you cant troll me

First, capitalize the L in Libertarian. The US Libertardians have hijacked the word. The original, lower-case libertarian was used to describe Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, the father of mutualism, and he would cheerfully have beaten Ayn Rand to death with a clawhammer while singing the Marseillaise. Second, there's a hell of a lot more in the lower right "purple" quadrant than the Libertardians: mutualism, egoism, and individualism are all in the lower right, for example, none of whom bear any love for idiot Randroids.

Fair disclosure: I identify as a mutualist.

Most ideologies, if not all, are useless

switch rational and naive around and you're golden

nigga, i just want my freedoms
and abolition of the state is a good idea. instead of government for the people, by the people, government is based on one's own ability to keep their rights. natural selection, you feel me?

>implying it isn't naive to believe that a dog eat dog society where no state exists wouldn't quickly turn into feudalism

my man

>no example
talk to me after your done school kiddo

Very sincere. Money is pointless. It serves to separate and enslave. Government systems based around it are primitive.

You shouldn't be allowed to vote. Your low IQ shows so much it hurts.

Natural selection is for the unevolved

I'm pretty sure libertarian was first used by Joseph Déjacque, a French AnCom who was corresponding with Proudhon when the term was first used.

Rest of the point still stands.

Fair Disclosure, I identify as a Syndicalist

These political quizzes are disinformation. Liberalism isn't centrist and there's no such thing as a right wing dictator.

Not him, but a large majority of the top nations on Earth in every positive category are much more socialist than the united states. Norway, Iceland and Finland are very well off, the best honestly.

Spoken like a true non-working or alternatively wage-cucking faggot. Grow some balls and get some money pussy.

That's quite a solid argument you got there, bud. If you honestly don't believe in the existence of functioning communes around the world, you're a fucking idiot.

...

Even cavemen traded rocks

And you call leftists intolerant.

...

The Hopi and the highland Yanomani have had stable, largely peaceful anarchist communities for millennia. They have tribal elders whose word is often followed because they give good advice, but they have no formal authority. Early US communities were also anarchic, with rules and laws being determined by simple show of hands at town hall meetings. And that's not even counting revolutionary Ukraine or Spain, both which were organized by anarchists and were highly efficient and functional.

>government is based on one's own ability to keep their rights. natural selection, you feel me?

user, this happens in the real world all the time, the results are always a fucking nightmare. Natural selection is not whatever videogame fantasy you think it is. It's mass rape, murder, carbombs, poverty, anarchy and chaos and a power vacuum that will be filed with something bad.

I used to be a Libertarian. Libertarians tend to hold too many ideals that are arguable in their effectiveness, but unrealistic in their chances of being adopted by society, such as the removal of driver's licenses. While "Libertarianism" is a pretty broad spectrum - one that I don't necessarily disagree with - the majority of modern Libertarians (especially those involved in the government & politics) hold too many of these positions for the movement or the party to ever get a strong foothold in American politics.

classical Liberalism holds many of the same ideals, but tries to govern from a more centrist position, as to increase the ability for these ideals to actually make their way into policy. Essentially, you have to start off on as close to common ground with the establishment as possible in order to move policy in specific direction, and Classical Liberalism is the most effective way to get Libertarianism's foot in the door.

>implying competition wont help keep things in check

Have fun living in your fantasy world in which currency doesn't exist you dumb piece of shit. It's because of utopia thinking faggots like you that we fail to progress in the real world.
this

Red = Feminist/Cuck
Green = Nigger
Blue = Average White Male
Purple = Alex Jones

your basis for assuming this was... what, exactly?
Humans aren't evolved. We learned to think better than animals, but humans are animals by nature. No matter how 'civilized' we pretend to be, we're animals at heart, and fueled by primitive desires. It is only logical to appeal to those desires as we are meant to as animals.
Exactly. If you're strong enough to survive, you're better. You *earn* your rights. Big Brother doesn't hold your fucking hand.

>implying that competition would stay around
>implying monopolies wouldn't happen for literally every industry

hi
let's create a party together

>native american tribes living inside of the world's only superpower
>entities which failed to last a few decades

Anarchists are children, burnouts and oblivious limousine liberals.

this

Checked.
Look around. You think this system is working? Youre delusional to defend such a corrupt system, and don't grasp the implications of military industrial complex. Youre naive and the mans bitch.

>Exactly. If you're strong enough to survive, you're better. You *earn* your rights. Big Brother doesn't hold your fucking hand.

user, shut the fuck up and watch videos of regions of the world where no state has control. You're probably going to have to use liveleak more than youtube for obvious reasons to anyone but you.

...

I'm a card-carrying Wobbly and I used to identify as an anarchosyndicalist, but I've spent the last 25 years trying to organize things which a succession of reds, social democrats, leftists, and harder-core-than-thou campus radicals, all of whom were first in line when you needed someone to wave a flag or sign a fiery manifesto, but vanished in a puff of smoke when there was actual work which needed to be done. I decided I have no interest in share and share alike with shirkers and glory-hounds. I want some way to track who is doing which labour, and to be rewarded for my labour when I'm doing more of it.

My stuff belongs to me, not The People, not The State, and not The Boss. I might or might not share it depending on how I feel, but I am under no obligation to do so.

We are evolved. You would probably rape someone and blame instincts, eh? We are able to withhold or instincts for the betterment of the planet, unlike animals

Quick question: are these extreme?

I mean, it's complicated. if you're worried of someone knowing your results, green and purple are extreme.

Exactly.
These cunts just want an excuse to commit crimes.

I see no problem with such regions. More powerful groups or individuals earned their power, and they enforce it. Those who die in their wake are lesser people.
We can bottle things up all we want, but the fact remains that such desires are in all of us, whether we want them or not.

>implying i'm the retard who wants the state abolished instead of it's power decreased
>implying competition wouldn't stay around because one of the few powers gov should have is the ability to split up monopolies

so has your role playing of a revolutionary got you anywhere in life?

Where are my based authoritarian left master race niggaz?

Because socialized medicine is awful, right guys? Better make sure all the homeless die from the flu!

...

KEK says the neckbeard with absolutely no physical prowess whatsoever. You'd be the first to get killed by what you support. Kill yourself right now and make the process quicker buddy.

Personally, I disagree with the idea of a "Classical Liberty" party. I think any Classical Liberal who gets involved in politics should do their best to steer one of the two realistically viable parties back towards the center. Forming a party only succeeds in siphoning the most rational parts of the left or the right (which will arguably never be the majority of voters), which in turn widens the gap of Conservatism and Leftism. This is one the biggest reasons why I've completely changed my mind over the past few years on a 3+ party system in the U.S.

Trump ain't so bad tbh.

thanks user

We all have the desire but what is more important; you or the community? If you value your own pleasure over the community thriving, you are a nigger