So what wins: an ustoppable force or an immovable object, Sup Forums?
So what wins: an ustoppable force or an immovable object, Sup Forums?
Daniel Thompson
Other urls found in this thread:
Caleb Kelly
Luis Sullivan
ya mom lol
Julian Gonzalez
Assuming the immovable object isn't indestructible, the force blows straight through the object
Xavier Young
This, also, sauce plox.
Nathan Rodriguez
Sauce?
Sebastian Long
Sauce
Jayden Campbell
If its immovable it won't crumble
Jackson Johnson
sauce
Connor Powell
Say something nice about her and I'll give you sauce.
James Bell
Neither. Since both of these objects would require infinite amounts of energy (specifically for the atomic bonds) they rub against each other forever.
Also sauce pls
Josiah Ross
webm source?
Owen Martin
She's pretty
Gavin Bennett
as my motorbike training guy once put it, going fast doesn't kill, stopping abruptly because of an immovable object does.
Julian Green
They surrender.
Leo Powell
She's pretty.
Landon Thompson
Ran Sem
Julian Cooper
What do you mean by "wins"?
Jonathan Cox
unstoppable force, immovable doesn't mean unbreakable
Colton Perez
She's pretty
Owen James
Fine. It's called Ran->Sem.
You guys are lazy. Obviously she's pretty.
Landon Sanchez
Wait, this object cannot be moved, if the force were to just break the object or blow through it, then a part of the object would be moved. You cannot drill through a hole without moving some particles. It doesn't just delete matter. The unstoppable force cannot just bread through.
Alexander Hughes
Which one is made out of diamond?
Ian Rivera
the unstoppable force of my cock in your mom's ass
Aiden Torres
They are the same thing as movement is relative
Nicholas Parker
the hardest metal obviously is the immovable objects per unstoppable
Isaac Phillips
If those things ever existed, they would go through. Most of the atoms space is empty.
But as this things can't exists in reality, it's just an abstract problem, and thus can have an abstract solution like "no solution"... or "carrot", anything works, everything would be equally correct..
Aiden Ortiz
This "riddle" was solved many years ago;
Defining the two is the key.
An irresistible force is by definition not going to encounter anything that can withstand it.
An unmovable object is also by definition not going to encounter anything that can move it.
Simple semantics decrees that both of these objects must only be found in a reality where the other does not.
So simply put the answer is;
Neither can ever meet and so any debate is moot.