According to the rules of Sup Forums is having a thread dedicated to nudism of all ages against the rules?

According to the rules of Sup Forums is having a thread dedicated to nudism of all ages against the rules?

Obviously the grey area is young nudist pictures but if it's legal on the internet is it legal here?

It's only illegal if there's a picture of a 12 year old girl with a look of bliss on her face with her pussy stretched over her dad's cock.

Otherwise it's fine. Fuck if I really know, I'm not a lawyer.

Probably because somes people are going to jerk on it

Lawyers, mods, oldfags?

no cause mods are fags

Absolutely not legal you disgusting shitlords.
you people are the scum of the earth.
Worse then murderers.

(you)

People will jerk it to your comment, where do you think we are?

*than

How can we get an official answer on this?

Beautiful fucking tits, man.

The official answer is no. There is no reason that works with the actual law. The only reason is emotional and based on the idea that every person over 18 is a child rapist, and every person under 18 is an innocent.

Officially...
Its fine.
Theres been nudist threads with nude 9yo n bullshit.
So basically post away.

...

Try posting a thread like this and you'll get banned. That's your official answer.

No he wont.
Ur not the future.
What if he posts it and nothing happens...
Will u cease to exists?
Like saying rumple stiltskin name to him will you also disappear like a fart in a hurricane?

Nice try, Mr. FBI.

How did u know!
Breach breach!

Because context matters you piece of shit.
Pictures of naked children playing on the beach, in a neutral context, are fine but not here, where some jerks'd jerk on it.

>So basically post away.
You would like that wouldn't you?
You degenerate fuck.

Kill yourself.

I wonder how often we correctly guess fbi.

it's not fine here because it will lead to someone posting or asking for illegal shit. Just steer away from that area and you'll be fine.

Got anymore goodies ?

Cheese pizza

You're absolutely right, but the reason is wrong.
I'll say it again, there are jerks here who'll jerk it to your comment. Doesn't matter what it is, it'll get someone off here. What makes that content different? Nothing.

The reason why it isn't to be posted here is because it'll get the advertising to be pulled and asian moot will get so mad that we'll be able to see his eyes.

There seems to be 5 schools of thought so far. No because Sup Forums can't handle it. No for the sake of protecting the innocence of children. Yes if it's just natural art. Yes because pedo. And yes because it's legal on the internet

I wish women would take better care of their skin...

Why don't we play the Legal Nudism game?

Take the last 2 digits of your post, and replace the X's with those digits: LSP-0XX

Search that on bing

Nice try, Mr. FBI.

>google fkk
>pics of nekkid kids
>wew

>not legal but literal first pictures on Google images

>there are people on this board right now who are pro-skub

Degenerates

Summon the mods for an official declaration

Love you moot! Hope my thread doesn't make you mad. Just had to know on behalf of the internet

>posting nudist in a nudist thread is OK
>posting nudist in porn thread is porn, so CP

>moot
>current year

Asian* Moot.

That's a good point

Oldfag and lawyer here. It's fine as long as it doesn't show underage sex.

Very often.

It seems the consensus is as long as it's not a porn thread but a naturalist/nudist thread and there are no pictures of underage sex it is ok. Speak up if you would like to add anything or else hold your piece

*Peace lol

If it's pornographic obv illegal, but there are nudist websites/naturalists that would have pictures of all kinds of people naked but it isn't for a sexual purpose to it's technically legal.

The reason youll get banned on Sup Forums for posting is because it's just not allowed and because pedos lurk here and will fap to it. The post will be of ill intentions which would promote pedophilia and child pornography.

I know that 8ch doesn't care about these kinds of thing, and i saw some questionable threads in there that wasn't CP, but the people in the thread were obviously sexually objectifying the kids in the pictures which was disgusting.

my ex wasnt nudist but she was exobitionst she walked around public and sometime crowded places with no clothes for dares

looking for pics now

>looking for pics now
Bumping for this.

Yes please

She looks good, man.
You could start a whole thread for her.

Bump

Bump