Which of the following countries would be the hardest to conquer?

which of the following countries would be the hardest to conquer?

>USA EU or China?

Other urls found in this thread:

thebalance.com/u-s-debt-to-china-how-much-does-it-own-3306355
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Why is the EU on this fucking list? It's already been taken over.

>Countries
>EU

Us. Can't land troops on our Shores if we blow everything in the air and water away before they make landfall.

All you have to tell EU is they aren't multicultural enough then just send whoeverthefuck you have laying around. China would be difficult.

this

The EU. It is vast and varied. Unless you nean post-Brexit, in which case the UK take their commonwealth with them and I would subsequently vote US.

USA, then China, then the EU.

>Countries.
American retardation.

>frozen wasteland to the north
>deserts and mountains to the south
>oceans to the east and west
the US would be the most difficult to conquer by far. China depends too much on foreign oil/trade and can be easily embargoed. Europeans will not fight to defend their actual countries, let alone other European countries.

Us has the firepower, china has the numbers to absorb a lot of casualties and europe has the possibility of becoming right wing enough in the face of hostilities to rekindle it's imperialistic urges. But china has the best defensive capabilities overall.

>American retardation.

>US has the firepower.
Yet most guiding-systems are produced in northern Europe. Well done, you utter retard.

>eu isnt a country
since that leaves china and usa it would be usa simply because we have more citizens with guns meaning militias that can do guerilla fighting and the chinese people may welcome a new ruler since many are at odds with the government to the pint of possible revolt
usa is full of people that will fight invaders simply to fight regardless if they have views similar to those of a certain group

Dolce et decorum, right user?

That Norwegian coastline tho. The US would never let those Norwegians get overtaken by Russia, and guess what, the political situation between Norway and Russia is unstable as is. Especially since Norway let's the US army train there. Educate yourself. Seriously, please do.

Is this some kinda D&D bullshit?

Well, EU can be considered a country. If (or when?) all of its members adopt the euro, they get a common army (which is being discussed) and they get a common taxing policy it will be a full blown country. In many ways it already is as much of a country as the US, just very decentralized.

It doesn't say who is invading it just says Europe and since Russia is also European they would be allies against this joint threat. Buy some glasses, seriously, please do.

>Still a continent, you fucking retard.

>Russia is also European
Nope, try again.

As a Finn, I don't know whether to be proud, or ashamed that 1/4th of us will not fight.

Europe is the continent. The European Union is, however, something else. I was talking about the EU, not the continent.

The Us spends more on "defence" than the rest of the world it doesn't matter where it's made if you can't afford to buy it like half of Europe and has the biggest citizen militia since the general population is so well armed. Well done jacking off to one tiny portion of the broad aspects of war thick shit.

>The term “European Russia” was used in the Russian Empire to refer to traditional East Slavic territories under Russian control, including what is now Belarus and most of Ukraine.

Educate yourself.

thisonly time EU will be a "country" is when they officially become a country is when they give up independence to be 1 nation or when germany gets its head out of its ass and reconquers europe

EU
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH

Russia makes up 38% of Europe and the European half of Russia has 77% f the Russian population in it.

easy. The U.S. Air defenses, invading force would be fucked and even if they made it in, the country is full of guns, pretty much everyone has guns, I'm talking enough guns for like everyone from elementary schoolkids to old grandmas to be strapped..

Independence is a relative term. US states also have some degree of independence and EU states/countries have to respond to the EU parliament.

European Russia means the western part of Russia you thick shit not the various Eastern European countries.

>"defence".
KEK
Fuck off with your BS rhetoric, dumbdumb.

USA has the most powerful navy, you'll have yo invade through mehico if you want a chance

Russia is NOT part of the E.U.

Lets just cut the shitty pride and be honest, the USA would be the most difficult country on earth to conquer PERIOD. all this petty swabbing.

It's called the defence budget not the team America budget.

>implying some civilians with guns could pose any threat at all to a major power occupying their country

China would be really hard just because of sheer numbers, but I think USA wins because of the 2nd amendment.

Nope, you are talking about Eastern Euro. And they are no longer "Russian". Even tho the Russians are trying to take parts of Ukraine.

you should know what to be if you remember you history.

You mean like the Islam militias in the middle east sending thousands of yanks back in boxes.

make it easier for you
go to a eu country and ask what country are you in and if they don't say eu then that country isn't part of eu. do this in every nation part of the eu. in the end none will say eu thus eu is not a country
go to a a state in usa and ask what country are you in and they will say usa

Dutchman reporting fack this country

yeah because that never happened in any war ever...

Slav cunts, are Slavic. Not European.

China wouldnt be hard.
like user said we could force a a trade embargo and their economy would plummet. They would be forced to attack or surrender and either way they would lose. Numbers dont count for shit if your poor, starving and most likely falling into chaos on your own soil

Conquer conquer? As in conquest, those people become part of the larger country eventually?

Military wise, it would come down to USA vs China. Sorry EU, but the USA has been fighting your wars for years now, and you've already proven that you can be conquered. I would still say the USA can beat China, but that's debatable.

Ultimately, conquering a country is not about military might. It comes down to assimilating the population. The USA is made up of misfits rejects and rebels, and has the highest population of civilian firearm ownership. In fact, the largest armed force in the world is the civilian population of the USA. You can't fight an insurgent force like that - just as the USA lost in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, you name it.

Now China, on the other hand. The Chinese are a naturally cooperative people. Not to say that they all get along or some kind of shit like that, but they have a tighter social cohesion and place more emphasis on community and society. Americans are individualist survivalist nutbags.

What I'm saying is, the Chinese are more likely to accept a new status quo as law, if only to avoid social division and maintain social cohesion.

I'm talking about Europe not the EU, if the EU was attacked by anyone else Russia would have to get involved for self-preservation.

China would be logistically fucked too.

If Chinas economy plummets, all western economies follow suit

common people with guns and militia are two different things. especially if your born and bred in war.

>trade embargo
On China?
How would they then give you that sweet Chinese welfare? If it wasn't for Chinese funds, the US would be fucked.

EU of course, USA and China are pieces of cake.. when EU will start the ethnic debate you are all fucked :D

How so? Explain why?

The EU is being actively conquered as we speak lol.

The US has been fighting EU's wars for decades.

are we talking about a fight here or an all out conquer? im cnfused

not really. self-preservation wouldn't have anything to do with it, but they would definitely want to take advantage of the chance to reclaim all the eastern bloc and former ussr countries though. OP never said Europe though.

uhhhhh nope.

How much $ does the US owe China?

When has Germany ever conquered the EU?

are you in the U.S.?

A militia is just a group of civilians with guns who fight so if America was invaded then they would join into militias.

How much money do you owe somebody that conquers you or kills you?

>being this retarded
this is why i sent my kids to private schools

what exactly do you think a militia is? who exactly do you think makes up militias, einstein?

>The country we owe money to, tries to conquer us
>Wew lad there goes our debt to them

Uhr, durr, yes.
>The U.S. debt to China is $1.058 trillion.

thebalance.com/u-s-debt-to-china-how-much-does-it-own-3306355

that may be the debt. you're still wrong.

Op said Eu, the area pretty much next to Russia with just a few slavic countries between them so Russia would strike so they were not invaded next.

Because Chinas ridicillus infrastructure boom with imports required is the only thing keeping the western economy afloat. Since the recession they've poured more concrete than USA did for an entire century. That and they have the largest financial sector in the world, largely propped up by said boom. If China goes pop then so does everybody else

SeeAndRetard

>conquers
The US kneeled for some rice-farmers in Vietnam. What makes you think they could conquer China? Wishful thinking?

*ridiculous

EU

Because why would you want to conquer a piece of shit union?

In hindsight, being absolute fucking garbage is actually the best defense.

US, since there are around 100 million gun owners in the US, and most have more than one gun, so they can arm multiple people. The other 2 are cucked and are unarmed, so they're fucked.

Can't tell if trolling or actually completely uneducated about Vietnam

europe does not equal e.u. again, incorrect as to your reasoning. they would not nor would they need to (nor would an aggressor try push east) strike for defense they would be involved for the chance to gain/regain territory.

cool except 1.058 trillion isn't actually very much.
the majority of the U.S. debt is owed to it's people

China is too easy to contain, and their economy relies too much on exports/imports, so containment will hurt them a lot. After their economy collapses, they will possibly fall back into warring states when Shanghai/HK/Guangzhou/Shenzhen want to return to the very lucrative (for them) trade with the West, but Beijing wants to maintain chinese unity by force and continue transferring wealth from the coast to the center of china.

Europe is difficult to conquer, but also difficult to unite. If they can remain united, they will do well. if they can be picked apart piece by piece, they will fall. Militant European nationalism is not on the EU level, but at the national level. The entire point of the EU is to prevent the Europeans from going to war with each other. Who will die to maintain a union that promised them peace? I don't see how anyone will die for the EU.

USA is more united than Europe. Their navy is too strong to invade them by sea. You will need to invade via canada or mexico (assuming they won't be US allies anymore). The best way to "conquer" the US is not militarily, but to infiltrate their political system by bribing and blackmailing politicians.

It's ultimately more the other way around. China is the world's slave labor (being made irrelevant by automation). If the world stopped buying from China, iPhones would cost $2000. But if the world stopped buying from China, they would starve. The only reason why they're economically strong is because we buy from them, and they fuck their people and environment.

You would never conquer any country that has a biological and nuclear arsenal "easily". Chances are you'd get at least some nuking in your major cities

that's just the documented numbers. there's significantly more.

Some real salt over there in EU.
We arent grunts in the forests anymore.
Land, Air and Sea superiority inst wishful thinking its a death wish. You honestly think if the US and CHINA went to war CHINA would win?

>The arrogance of the generic Ameritard.
Still lost in Vietnam, and crawled back home with their tails between their legs. KEK

I wouldn't say the US knelt. It was a proxy war between essentially capitalism and communism.

Now imagine it was America that was being invaded by Vietnamese. See where your logic runs out? China couldn't invade the US, but the US could definitely invade China.

Fuck, China got SLAUGHTERED in WW2 by the Japanese. What the Japs did to China in WW2 made the holocaust look like a fucking joke.

The naive conquerer thinks that the hardest part of conquering is the military stage, whereby usually in the space of days, to weeks, or even years, a significant population of troops are transitioned to a foreign country, and begin act of warfare, to destabilize the opposing country's infrastructure.

They would be incorrect. History has proven that, in this century especially, the most difficult stage in a conquer of another nation is the phase whereby the "" conquered "" citizens are integrated into the new government.

Because it turns out, it's no longer possible to just vaguely threaten the masses, and expect them to return salutes. In very, very few circumstances around the world is that still a possibility, such as in North Korea.

Therefor, the most difficult country to conquer of those three, would be the EU, specifically because they are the most reliant on imports in order to sustain the population. The U.S., regardless of its current technological direction, has abundant natural resources, which could be repurposed for sustaining the conquered population in relative appeasement. China has had massive infrastructure work done in the previous decades, and is also capable of propping itself up from the outside.

However, because the EU is so reliant on imports--in large part due to Great Britain's expansion in previous centuries, and the subsequent trade routes developed then--it is simultaneously impossible to conquer.

It can be damaged, or sabotaged, but installing a new government there, with the intention of the residents assimilating into a foreign society is the most difficult of those three choices.

EU equals most of Europe apart from the few slavic countries as I stated. They would because if you did successfully invade the EU you can either go East into Russia or gather your forces and cross the ocean to invade the US so Russia is the much easier choice.

America duh, too many guns, I don't know why we even have a military, can u imagine the hicks that stock pile guns having a reason to use them? Dam branch dividians had a small compound and held the feds and army back for months

This guy
Post a pic of yourself i want to see how fucking disgustingly ugly you are. You uneducated piece of shit.

>uneducated about Vietnam
Indeed it seems you are.

You guys always sing the praises of your bullshit school systems, and then you say retarded shit like this.

The US definitely didn't "beat" Vietnam, but it definitely didn't lose either. How many communist countries do you see these days? Remember how that was the reason for being there to begin with?

They both export and import a lot, and yes sealing them off would kill their economy, as it would kill ours. Like you said we're mutually dependent as theyre the final stop of our great global production line

>the smug false sense of security and superiority of the eurocuck.

militarily, Vietnam was not a loss. politics reasons ended that engagement, also, as westernized as Vietnam is, wouldn't be so quick to call it a loss anyways--they serve the empire of the global petrocurrency, just like you and everyone else.....

don't confuse geography with political and territorial sovereignty. they are not mutually exclusive, are you daft? You are wrong. Period.

eurocucks have no clue

>the US could definitely invade China.
Nope. Thing is, they wouldn't even try. See how well they are doing down in sandnigger states. China would eradicate any threat. The have the funds and the manpower.

These guys get it
Besides, what is the POINT of conquering another country? Anyone?

no they don't remember, they are too busy looking down their noses at everyone and bending over for pc while their continent is being invaded by muslim ''refugees'.

...

This is exactly it. Global trade has made major power war obsolete.