Wtf i love snyder now

wtf i love snyder now

Other urls found in this thread:

blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2016/03/11/inside-chris-terrios-vision-for-batman-superman-and-justice-league/
popmatters.com/feature/beautiful-lies-and-false-gods-in-batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice/
pulpklatura.tumblr.com/post/141843209469/batman-v-superman-the-modern-revenge-tragedy
archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/
archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/popmatters.com/feature/
thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2011/04/‘sucker-punch’-a-feminist-perspective
vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/sucker-punch-or-how-to-make-monarch-mind-control-sexy-7-2/
practicaltheorist.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/is-zack-snyders-sucker-punch-a-radical-feminist-deconstruction-of-action-movies/
slashfilm.com/video-you-dont-understand-sucker-punch
youtube.com/watch?v=5gXir4Pu0f0
youtube.com/watch?v=qQm1rBqh53Y
strawpoll.me/10746474/
youtube.com/watch?v=gYKeQczkFfM
reddit.com/r/DC_Cinematic/comments/4uvw5w/the_best_6_seconds_of_movie_trailer_history/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>/r/DC_Cinematic

Affleck's remark, "I'm real when it's useful," at first sight adheres to the postmodern solipsistic and relativistic modes. This is confirmed by Terrio when questioned about his research for Justice League, which included "red- and blueshifts in physics". However, on further inspection, Affleck's comment simultaneously reinspects Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". This invariably leads to a more pragmatic worldview, as Pierce declares "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Affleck further confirms the pragmatic totality when approaching Miller and Momoa:
>"So you're fast."
>"You can talk to fish."
Reality as it operates in Snyder films, isn't subservient to language, they work in tandem. This leads as back to Eastern philosophy, the Hinduist Guru Mantra becomes another mythopoetical jigsaw piece in the totality of Justice League. As Brody succintly observed, "Even at his most pedestrian or bombastic, Snyder makes a far more engaging film than Christopher Nolan (an executive producer of “Batman v Superman”) ever did—because Nolan presumes to know and to show, whereas Snyder wants to see. Even his slender philosophical world seems like he’s discovering it, not delivering it."

>muh tone

>I failed him in life...I won't fail him in death
>Superman's selfless sacrifice is the spark of Batman's rebirth into light and the dawn of a new golden age of heroism.
>Chris Terrio says this is the intention even before BvS releases
>Dawn of Justice...literally the night is darkest before the dawn.
>First picture of the Justice League features the sun rising in the background

Why are people claiming that Justice League being lighter is anything other than what was always intended? Are people really this dense?

Chris Terrio:
>At that moment, I thought, “I’m not done with this yet. I want to go back and keep telling the story.” “Batman v Superman” is a bit of an “Empire Strikes Back” or “Two Towers” or any similar middle film in a trilogy. The middle film tends to be the darkest one. I do think from “Man of Steel” through “Justice League,” it is one saga really.

>I expect “Justice League” will be tonally not quite as dark as “Batman v Superman.” From that point of view, I felt compelled to go back and try to lift us and myself into a different tonal place because I think when you write a darker film, sometimes you want to redeem it all a bit.

blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2016/03/11/inside-chris-terrios-vision-for-batman-superman-and-justice-league/

Will Terrio deliver a decent enough script lads?

It's amazing that people really think Snyder can make "deep" films.

...

>Reddit

This confirms it. DCU is reddit.

Marvelkino is officially Sup Forums.

...

...

thats a reddit tier macro if I've ever seen one

All the good parts of BvS was Terrio's work apparently. I'm so glad Goyer's gone.

...

...

Is this satire?

>/r/DC_Cinematic

...

KGBeast never betrayed Supes, he didn't even know him.
If you want to compare Mulvey with Judas you'll have to use (ironically) his role in TWS, where he betrays the Captain.

...

...

> greek image
> gun right in the middle of the painting

Really makes you think...

Maybe it's their similar facial features, but I keep thinking KGBeast is the same actor as Masketta Man.

popmatters.com/feature/beautiful-lies-and-false-gods-in-batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice/

Now make one for Civil War.

...

...

It literally has a subreddit address in the corner you blind cuck.

...

he already did

pulpklatura.tumblr.com/post/141843209469/batman-v-superman-the-modern-revenge-tragedy

wow really makes you think.

Why's Harrison Wells working for Marvel?

DCkeks = plebbitors confirmed

Too bad they can make a good movie to save their lives.

You obviously didn't get it, so I'll tell you why it's good. The main theme of Snyder's "Batman v Superman" on spiritual dematerialism is not eschatological, but a phenomenological ontology. Thus he implies that we have to choose between predialectic construction and deconstructivist neodialectic theory, essentially Heideggerian as seen in the concept of Dasein. The subject is interpolated then into a cinematic dematerialism that includes spirituality as a whole. But if the Kierkegaardian worldview holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of expression and atomism. In Snyder's own "Man of Steel" he has a character says that "the world's too big”. Inherent in this is how the function of Lebenswelt (cinematically translated by Snyder as "world of life") operates in all his films, chiefly in "Sucker Punch" and "300". We see a phenomenological approach to the world showing a cinematic logic that presupposes a strucutral constraint in rootedness, another intentionality central to his filmography and philosophy. Because "metaphysical comfort" is not an object of temporality per se, but rather an aspect of automatic condition, as suggested by Cavell. Hermeneutic interpretations are also apparent in his post-"Watchmen" movies; in fact the interchangeable subjectivities are but another representation of Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". As his academic hero Heidegger succintly noted, "freedom is the ‘abyss’ of Dasein, its groundless or absent ground". This is essentially the thesis operating in Snyder's films.

...

...

...

Now i get it. You save my plebeian life. I will not fail for Marvewl hype trains again! Thanks Based Hack!

...

>/r/DC_Cinematic

...

archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/Affleck's remark, "I'm real when it's useful/
archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/
archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/popmatters.com/feature/

What a fucking pleb with no cineknowledge

Sucker Punch (Extended Cut) was a treatise on the objectification of women as seen through the eyes of various nerd subcultures. The prism by which the movie is shown self reflects to the viewer their own ugliness.

It's a hypnotizing take on psychological trauma. It cleverly turns it into an esoteric, theatrical, fantasy extravaganza. Its own nakedness makes people feel shameful and uncomfortable.

It's a movie that literally hates its own audience and spits on them.

>"“I wanted to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.”" - J.G. Ballard

If that isn't true kino, I don't fucking know what is.

>thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2011/04/‘sucker-punch’-a-feminist-perspective

>vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/sucker-punch-or-how-to-make-monarch-mind-control-sexy-7-2/

>practicaltheorist.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/is-zack-snyders-sucker-punch-a-radical-feminist-deconstruction-of-action-movies/

>slashfilm.com/video-you-dont-understand-sucker-punch

>You are wrong about Sucker Punch by The Escapist
>youtube.com/watch?v=5gXir4Pu0f0

>You Don't Understand Sucker Punch by Antisocial Commentary
>youtube.com/watch?v=qQm1rBqh53Y

Good God did you learn about Heidegger from Wikipedia? You would be laughed out of a university philosophy course for that and that's a very difficult feat to pull off

>this entire thread

>reddit

>How the fuck can you get this shit to work.png

REMINDER

strawpoll.me/10746474/

No it wasn't. It was a dumb action movie that a select few hipster decided to latch onto for some unfathomable reason.

I like how they shoehorned George Miller with DC even though he's not directing anything.

Iron Man 3 was a treatise on the dilemma of what makes a man (the suit or the man himself), the control that the arms industry has over the governments and the deconstruction of war propaganda.

It's a hypnotizing take on psychological trauma. It cleverly turns it into an esoteric, theatrical, fantasy extravaganza. Its own nakedness makes people feel shameful and uncomfortable.

It's a movie that literally hates its own audience and spits on them.

>This film resembles its protagonist Tony Stark: its overblown, convoluted and seemingly disconnected to anything that has come before it.

If that isn't true kino, I don't fucking know what is.

It's simple: People want to be different. And one of the surefire ways to be "different" is to dislike what's popular with most people and/or like what most people are not into.

DC and Marvel are in direct competition, and Marvel has grown popular with the audience. And here we have Snyder, who makes wildly unpopular movies, filling up his material with empty symbolism and awkward philosophy to be "deep", and actively encouraging conflict by making passive-agressive comments at Marvel movies and about how his movies are literally 2DEEP4U.

It was inevitable a large subset of would-be special snowflakes would latch onto it as works of genuine quality to stroke their own ego and validade their misguided sense of self-worth.

If Suicide Squad becomes popular with the crowd, I assure you they'll turn it around and claim DC "sold out".

>It's difficult to find a movie that feels true to itself. You feel the hand of Hollywood, the moviemaking by committee, on everything.
>[on Man of Steel (2013)] I think it's drawing on all mythology; comic book, religion, ancient, philosophical.
>
>[on the Superman character] All the movies I've made, I've made with a slight bit of irony. Not even a slight bit. A fair amount. But the ironic part of [ 'Man of Steel'] is that it's not ironic. You know what I mean? No tongue in cheek, no winking at the camera, no apologies. It's Superman. He deserves that. In my mind, we really had to act as if no films had been made. It's like we just found this comic book lying on the ground under a bed, and we were like, This would be a cool movie.
>
>[For me] Superman is this adopted son, this immigrant story, this guy trying to find his place in the world. What's his purpose, what is he supposed to do, how is he supposed to be?
>[promoting Watchmen (2009) and before he was hired for Man of Steel (2013)] In this world, if Superman really existed, he'd grab all the world leaders together in a room and say, 'Behave or I'll kill you.'
>
>[on presenting his male protagonists with superhuman physiques] I have always been influenced by the fantasy art of Frank Frazetta and obsessed with the potential of humanity's physicality.

Pffff plz

BvS seriously only got 27%?
What a complete fucking joke. Rotten tomatoes is nothing but paid reviews and fanboys.

>I don't want to give the effort required to examine this movie critically so I'm just going to say it is stupid

lol

stop being cringe please

Wonder Woman and Suicide Squad aren't even made by Snyder.
SS was made by Ayer and the man can actually make good films outside of comic books(street kings, end of watch) unlike Snyder(the man should stick to stuff similar to 300 like a live action heavy metal movie)

Because people disagree with you about a movie? Grow up.

Enjoyment of a film isn't some objective thing.
Frankly the difference between a 59% and a 27% on RT is negligible. If most people disliked your film, it's going to be low regardless whether or not the would personally consider it all that bad.

I watched BvS last night after reading a million threads on here about it, idk what all the hate/hype is about. It was pretty much just an average super hero movie, and there were some stupid parts but marvel is just as guilty. It was pretty good, don't know why critics shat on it so hard

Most people don't get BvS/

Can we stop for a second and ask the question of who actually makes these images

I don't know if it's like a sincere thing from an unbelievably stupid tumblr account, or some Sup Forums meme that's been shoved up it's own ass so many times that it now just represents this weird meta ironic joke

MoS was amazing 10/10.
BvS was MCU tier.

>27%

You like Snyder trailers, which we all do.

This.

MoS was good except for Johnathon Kent and some parts that were unneeded or slow in pacing (that made the movie minutely jarring in parts).

The intro to MoS was mindblowing. Loved it.

>image.gif

Hello iPhone mobileposting ban evading memester

>/r/DC_Cinematic

>/r/DC_Cinematic

It's funny that some people can look at some dog shit on the ground and write an essay about life from the experience of staring at the dog shit.

Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Warner Bros, you know the people that make the DC movies.

You are probably one of those people who sees a renessaince painting in the museum and doesn't know what the big deal with the paiting, it's just a womam smiling

fuck, this is a rare evans

When is art,then yes i can see the meaning and beauty of it.
When it's a poorly made film like BvS, that is made by Snyder using the most generic and rookie type of symbolism and shit dialog then,it is what our actually appears to be. A shit film.

>[...]a new literary movement which would espouse something like the New Sincerity ethos:[1]"The next real literary “rebels” in this country might well emerge as some weird bunch of anti-rebels, born oglers who dare somehow to back away from ironic watching, who have the childish gall actually to endorse and instantiate single-entendre principles. Who treat of plain old untrendy human troubles and emotions in U.S. life with reverence and conviction. Who eschew self-consciousness and hip fatigue. These anti-rebels would be outdated, of course, before they even started. Dead on the page. Too sincere. Clearly repressed. Backward, quaint, naive, anachronistic. Maybe that’ll be the point. Maybe that’s why they’ll be the next real rebels. Real rebels, as far as I can see, risk disapproval. The old postmodern insurgents risked the gasp and squeal: shock, disgust, outrage, censorship, accusations of socialism, anarchism, nihilism. Today’s risks are different. The new rebels might be artists willing to risk the yawn, the rolled eyes, the cool smile, the nudged ribs, the parody of gifted ironists, the “Oh how banal”. To risk accusations of sentimentality, melodrama. Of overcredulity. Of softness. Of willingness to be suckered by a world of lurkers and starers who fear gaze and ridicule above imprisonment without law. Who knows[...]

>/r/DC_Cinematic

DC_Cinematic

Snyder's always been based

>/r/DC_Cinematic

youtube.com/watch?v=gYKeQczkFfM

>/r/DC_Cinematic

>/r/DC_Cinematic

DC KEKS BTFO'D

I really really like this thread

>>r/DC_Cinematic

I just know OP will crop that out and attempt to repost the thread at a later date.

What did they mean by this?
reddit.com/r/DC_Cinematic/comments/4uvw5w/the_best_6_seconds_of_movie_trailer_history/

bruh

Look at this DEWD

So many layers to bvs. is this what it means to be kino?

You must have nothing going on in the way of culture if you're arguing the artistic merits of products designed to sell toys.

i just want to say that the "snyder makes kino" meme is the only reason I even come back to Sup Forums anymore. you guys somehow killed Baneposting because you felt in charge, but at least i get to enjoy new shitposts every time DC releases tidbits of anything now.

pretty much everyone is bummed BvS was worse than anyone could have imagined so people have gone to the opposite extreme of the spectrum and stand behind it being the greatest film of all time. who knows if it's trolling or legitimate praise at this point, half the people on this site take everything they read online as fact.

>still in denial