>people can own more than one house (property) despite not needing it nor living on it.
Please explain me with a solid argument why is this allowed.
How do you justify thar in a society with problems like homelessness, a person can own something that thwy dont need but other people need?
It's almost a theft, it should be ilegal
Because they have the money for it.
The poor should suffer
it's because 'they earned it'
the same reason there are millionaires
>capitalism
>mostly for renting
op is a NEET, triggered and a faggot
...
wow u so edgy dude XD
No one actually needs a house.
>people can own more than they need
>not realizing it's been this way for millenia
>being retarded
Nice b8
while I tent to agree with you op.
houses dont really cost that much money.
for houses that look like that within a five mile radius of where I live you can get one for around 20k that needs work, or around 70k move in ready.
The price of housing is hugely inflated (not as bad as before 2007) but its still historically high compared to wages.
All things considered, if you dont make above the average income in your area expect to live in a part of town you dont really want to live in.
Or find an area outside of town thats lowkey and do what you want.
Because genius, they can rent it and get extra income, instead of applying the money they saved on some scam they just buy a second or a third house and rent it.
Btw there a many pantless people in the world if you have more than one pair youre literally depriving them of pants, and consequently committing pant-rape.
Because some people work hard to manufacture those houses. A construction crew of about 30 people put that house together. Those 30 people all had families that needed to be fed. They are not farmers because they build houses. So how do they eat?
They trade there house building to the local farmers. They build them houses, farmers grow them food!
But sometimes the labor of growing food is larger that building a house and sometimes building a house is harder than growing food! So there is often times an uneven exchange of goods.
So, in order to prevent this, the house builders and the farmers get together and decide that there are going to creat a system of exchange using stamped circles of metal called "coins". They will only make a fixed amount, so the value stays somewhat stable.
They then assign prices to there houses and there crops. Thus they have created a system of equally sharing there labor into the economic system of exchange. So now people who have goods to bring to market, like basket weavers, come over and want to trade there baskets. So they exchange there baskets for coins and then save to buy a house from the house builders.
Than the lazy bum homeless man comes over. He doesn't make baskets, he doesn't makes houses, he doesn't grow food. He just posts and Sup Forums and complians about propert ownership.
And that's why he gets no coins. Cause the housebuolders and basket weavers and food growers all think homeless man is a lazy son of a bitch and deserves to sit in the rain. Maybe go to a state park and live in a cave.
Communism is theft.
Socialism is theft.
Because owning land is an investment you idiot.
Doesn't matter if there is a house on it or not. There's TONS of uninhabited land across America, the further you get away from cities, the cheaper it is.
If someone wanted to stop being homeless, they could buy an axe and and acre of woods and build a fucking log cabin. People do it in Alaska all the time.
>pant-rape
kek
So what you're saying, is that I should be allowed to tell you what you are allowed to spend money on
A grown adult
No, taking that extra home away from the man that owns it is theft. If the man that owns it wishes to give free housing to homeless they can. Some already do, and don't ask for anything in return. Forcing them to, or taking it from them to give it to the homeless is theft. You're retarded. Move to the quarantine zone on the west coast please.
Because otherwise there would be a lot more joblessness and homelessness.
>why can people with money buy things when people without money can't
Righto old chap, top marks for nonsense
There's a reason homeless people are homeless. Giving them a house isn't going to help pay utilities, put food on the table, or maintain the house.
Homeless is more about mental issues or drug addictions than not finding a job
Op trying to get Sup Forums to answed his grade 10 assignment question. Nice try faggot.
Homeless people in modern societies have no virtues, any more than an animal too stupid to build a nest when others thrive. Evolution selects for success.
OP should be killed for being stupid. I recommend being beaten to death by another spergtard. This is an adult board. Leave.
70k wtf
Dude where do you live... when do you live? 1995?
A semidetached in my hood goes for 1.3mil
cuz I have more money then you fucking poor idiot.
I have 2 apartmens and a house.
2 cars also.
Fuck you, go be poor some where else.
I just bought a second house right beside mine, so I wouldn't have neighbors. It was also a land grab since the yards share a common property line.
Theft would be forcing someone to redistribute what they earned to people who haven't earned it
I own a condo that I rent out, and I bought a boat to live in close to work. Rental is paying it's own mortgage and half of my slip fees, rest of my money is going into savings to buy another home/condo/apt. My job pays well so I'm actually able to save quite a bit. If anything later I might upgrade to a larger boat/yacht.
Feels good at 25 to be able to live like this on my own, and later have a guaranteed place to live.
Okay Robin Hood.. I expect to would shove five families in a six room flat and call it social progress.
People work hard, save and invest, they should reap the benefits. Layabouts, drug addicts and stupid people don't get to enjoy other's benefits.