What is the optimal number of members for a band ?

What is the optimal number of members for a band ?

stupid question

0

enough members to produce the sound you want to create with the instruments you want to incorporate

Four

5

3

Looks like he's already got the answer

dumb question.
depends in the band itself.

3-5

3 to 5. 2 is a maybe depending on the quality of their live performance. 5 is only acceptable if including a keyboard player. Over 5 is bad because it allows for a dedicated brass/woodwind/viola style member, which always looks stupid.

4 members is best, imo (pic related)
>Rhythm Guitar/Vocals
>Lead Guitarist
>Bass/Vocals
>Drums

69

or 420

3-5 with far being the best. However, if the music requires a lot of layers of instrumentation like mid to late period beach boys, then as many as necessary.

die.

Was this funny in your head you stupid teenager

xDDDD

Of course gramps, is it funny when you can't get up of the toilet

hahaha

this

dubs and 4 is the best number for a band

4 is the patrician number of band members:
>1 guitarist (can also play keyboards occasionally)
>1 bassist (can also play keyboards occasionally)
>1 drummer
>1 singer (can also play guitar and/or keyboards occasionally)

Another really funny post. Bravo

2 = gay
3 = qt
4 = solid
5 = gay
6 or more = super gay

Oh and
1 = autistic/sad

1 = look at me i'm electro producer!
2 = we don't need bassist
3 = patrician classic
4 = plebeian classic
5 = we have a blunt vocalist who does not know how to play guitar
6 and more = bitches you a jazz bigband or something?

9

This

Checked.

>Not 1000 drummers

Fag

Underage b&

>dedicated brass/woodwind/viola style member
>looks stupid
die

3-5