Americans allow mentally ill people to buy guns

>americans allow mentally ill people to buy guns

Why?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Acts_of_1792#Second_Militia_Act_of_1792
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because they don't view people unfortunately afflicted by mental illness as inherently less than human.

Your implication is rather problematic, Arto.

>implying it requires sanity to operate assault rifles
I am doing just fine and and I have a homicidal blog

Someone's gotta profit off of people no matter how unethical.

This. If the OP finn had its way, no one on Sup Forums could buy a gun.

that image REALLY activates my almonds

If it's worth getting shot over having your bike stolen, why don't we just shoot everyone who owns a bike?

Why dont we take it a step further? Lets shoot everyone.

State vs state, only civilians, who wins?

Massachusetts

Texas. High percentage of military veterans, big gun culture, high rural population, and a sense of nationalism to unify them.

Americans don't grade people on mental capacity. Doesn't matter that you are an inbred with hydrocephalia and polio, you should be allowed to be a policeman
The fact that Apple customers have electoral rights is a farse too but I'm the only one who cares

The fuck does a potato-fucker like you know about my country? You dont know shit.

> all these meme answers
The problem is the term "mentally ill" will inevitably be defined by some libcuck gun grabber in the government who will use it to ban all guns by declaring using logic a mental illness.

We can't let this happen, so yeah I'll take a handful of wackos with guns vs a fully disarmed and weak public for the globalists to push around however they please.

respect the irish, dumb american

Amen

Eat a banana, chimp.

>We can't let this happen, so yeah I'll take a handful of wackos with guns vs a fully disarmed and weak public for the globalists to push around however they please.

Please do. I'd be awfully boring otherwise.

Depends on the state desu. I'm generally pro-gun but I support keeping nuts away from them. Also, they should ask for proof of citizenship, a visa or green card. No guns for illegals.

An Irishman is probably your biological grandfather.

Respect the Brazilian, dumb northerner.

Odd way of dealing with overpopulation, but I guess it beats diabeetus.

Sup Forums isn't your designated Americans only zone you stupid underaged faggot

Pretty sure a lot more people have died in Chicago. Natural causes and all that.

>literal gangstas killing each other with black market (pun intended) firearms in Chiraq
>anything to do with the 2nd amendment

Because guns are fucking cool. Why shouldn't a guy get to own a gun just because he's stupid? Everyone's stupid.

Go suck your boyfriends dick, you pathetic cuckold.

>gang members killing gang members
literally who cares

Guns are banned in Chicago, a city run by liberals.

Probably people who bet on gangs, I would

>betting on American inner-city gang wars
could be cool

>yank complaining about an Irishman talking America
CANNOT MAKE IT UP

Is there a market for that? Asking for a friend.

#AI#

Easiest bet to fix in the world, just go out and shoot them yourself. It's not even illegal in america

Probably some betting pool within the CIA or Police Department somewhere

A private citizen who could bring down a criminal gang deserves to win that bet.

If these guys did it, I might call bullshit, though.

that and more mens

They're just human, the leader of my local gang was shot and killed two weeks ago. They've ruled this neighborhood for the past 6 years and now they're dissolving.

Or anyone with a crime record, right?

Because:
1) Not all people who have had a therapist or been in a mental institution are a danger to others
2) It would give doctors way too much control over peoples' natural rights
3) Fuck your shit, commie.

This is a pretty good analysis, but:

>It would give doctors way too much control over peoples' natural rights
This is the most important one. Very few Europeans even consider that, in the US, gun ownership is a right equivalent to speech, religion, due process or not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.

Arizona

Everyone who is a felon cannot purchase or own a gun even if it's a non-violent crime. That's why that douche dog the bounty hunter didn't carry a gun. Despite him acting like it was him being tough it was really because he's a felon.

Having said that being a felon has never stopped criminals from illegally obtaining guns just like in Belgium.

>sweden
>gangs
its just Mehmet with a gun controlling the cucks ay?

ok lads I'm an actual gang leader, AMA (I won't give my ethnicity or my location or the names of me or any of my associates, you can ask whatever else you want)

Your LoL group doesn't count

What colour is your skin?

>What colour is your skin?
white but Sup Forumsfags would argue my rather white skin is something brown even though it doesn't resemble that whatsoever

I don't play LOL. Or any games for that matter except for the occasional WoW vanilla (Elysium server).

>This kinda guy will literaly chimp out "MUH EURO HERITAGE, I'M FUCKING WHITE"
>Diss the Irish.

God Sup Forums i love you, never change.

Have you ever stabbed a cunt in the neck with a butterknife?

Why does the predicted mass of the quantum vacuum have little effect on the expansion of the universe?

stabbed a cunt with a butterknife in the ballsack and his stomach (had me in a headlock, I don't remember why I had a butterknife this was before I was a gang leader, in primary school)

cause it's predicted, dummy

>white but Sup Forumsfags would argue my rather white skin is something brown
I get the picture.

>Itp, Nigel fantasize about being a rude dude while enjoying his crumpets.

SWUR ON ME MUM

>A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

A number of issues here

>A well regulated militia

AKA not literally anyone and definitively not a mentally deranged individual.

>being necessary to the security of a free state

Militias are in no way necessary to secure a state, in fact it's proven to be the opposite due to endless military coups.

>the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

Unless you're a felon. Or underaged. Or any of those ten billion other exceptions. Leave it to Americans to not even be able to interpret their own constitution.

>cause it's predicted, dummy
touche

some nu-male faggot made it

I'm not British, I'm an ethnonationalist and my ethnicity is pure, has a BIG history of gang members but they are completely unrelated to mine, it just runs in the blood I suppose.

That can be anywhere from Italy to Turkey.
Not a muslim.

>2017
>faux-hawk hairstyle
ISHYGDDT

>teenagers can wield guns
>teenagers can't drink alcohol

Why are United Statians so inconsistent with their freedumbs?

>AKA not literally anyone and definitively not a mentally deranged individual.
But every able bodied male is de facto a part of the militia.
>Militias are in no way necessary to secure a state, in fact it's proven to be the opposite due to endless military coups.
But... Military coups are exactly what the militia is supposed to enable. Remember that the tree of libery has to be refreshed with blood of patriots... and tyrants. Foreign AND domestic.
>Unless you're a felon. Or underaged. Or any of those ten billion other exceptions. Leave it to Americans to not even be able to interpret their own constitution.
If you're a felon, you're stripped of most of your rights. But you're right, if a man has endured his punishment and is released into the public, he should have all his rights reinstated. If he's a danger to public, keep him in prison.

Besides, two wrongs don't make a right, so those are pretty poor arguments.

If you actually thought about it, though, there are positive uses for a gun, such as defending your family, or your country, whereas any use of alcohol is just down to the degree to which you mitigate the damage.

>inb4 a glass of red wine has antioxidants

>able bodied

Not sure what this has to do with americans.

>Remember that the tree of libery has to be refreshed with blood of patriots... and tyrants. Foreign AND domestic

You don't need an armed population for that at all.

>Besides, two wrongs don't make a right, so those are pretty poor arguments

Who says it's right? Three wrongs make three wrongs.

They're basically telling them to threaten bartenders with guns for beer until their of age

>Not sure what this has to do with americans.
Everything.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Acts_of_1792#Second_Militia_Act_of_1792
>The second Act, passed May 8, 1792, provided for the organization of the state militias. It conscripted every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45 into a local militia company. (This was later expanded to all males, regardless of race, between the ages of 18 and 54 in 1862.)
>You don't need an armed population for that at all.
Yeah, because resisting armed oppression is so easy. And because Americans secured their independence without any arms whatsoever.
>Who says it's right? Three wrongs make three wrongs.
You implied that by pointing out that their constitution is infringed already.

All people should be able to own everything the military can, anything less is infringing on the people's natural rights. It happens, yes. It's wrong.

#stop assault cars
#not all muslims

#notallToyotas

This. If someone opposes gun rights he opposes the freedom of individuals to protect themselves from their governments. Of course leftists hate gun rights as they prevent them from raising their socialist dictatorships. It's much harder to mass murder millions when they're able to defend themselves.

Because if no retards can buy guns in america, then no Americans could buy any damn guns

America is a country of no morals, they sell guns to terrorists.

Crazies don't have their right to free expression or vote taken away from them for being crazy

Then why should guns be taken away from them? You are basically taking away a inaliable right away from a lawful citizen that has done nothing wrong

Preventing crazy people from owning guns is one step away from Labeling dissent as a mental illness and taking everyones rights away

define mentalli ill

"People OP doesn't agree with".