Why are so many homosexuals on Sup Forums? and on Sup Forums in particular?

why are so many homosexuals on Sup Forums? and on Sup Forums in particular?

Define "homosexuals"

homosexuals are mentally ill

Sup Forums attracts all types of mentally ill

>why are so many homosexuals on Sup Forums? and on Sup Forums in particular?

I don't think there are. I think it's an organized campaign by some dorks who want to fill Sup Forums with shit.

There never used to be dick threads/trap threads/"tribute" threads et cetera.

You love to get your dick covered in another man's shit

They're all trolling. All Sup Forumstards are highly educated alpha chefs at Wendy's.

Im homosexual, but i hate all the faggot threads on here

Define "man"

That's not Homosexual, thatso just a weird fetish Faggot.

I like that image

>implying Sup Forums gets laid

Well jessthus what a questhtion.

made me laugh and I was drinking soda too fuck you

"In recognition of the scientific evidence, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the DSM in 1973, stating that "homosexuality per se implies no impairment in judgment, stability, reliability, or general social or vocational capabilities." After thoroughly reviewing the scientific data, the American Psychological Association adopted the same position in 1975, and urged all mental health professionals "to take the lead in removing the stigma of mental illness that has long been associated with homosexual orientations.""

"The World Health Organization's ICD-9 (1977) listed homosexuality as a mental illness; it was removed from the ICD-10, endorsed by the Forty-third World Health Assembly on 17 May 1990"

Because people like you are a contribution.

Anyone with an XY chromosome

>Some faggots removed faggot from a list as to not hurt faggots feelings
Simply changing a deginition doesnt make it not true

>Anyone with an XY chromosome
I can see it now:
"Hey, open your mouth real quick."
"Oh, I bet you've got something to stuff it with don-UGH WHAT THE FUCK user?"
"Don't be such a whiner, I just need to make sure you have an XX in your genetic code before I can fuck you."
Kek

Sup Forums was a super gay weebie board up until Fox news told America's conservatives that it was a source of child pornography. Now the board is a split between fags that are here to masturbate to pictures of feminine boys and conservatives who come here to indulge in their favourite hobby, the sexual abuse of children.

>Implying it's not easy to tell from physical charateristics and genitals

>implying your eyes are infallible
Is this the part where you break out into your Naruto LARP and tell me your eyes have special powers?

Well since you are op and op is a fag, why don't you tell us?

Theres always a tell m8 even if its at the point where you get them naked and there's a floppy penis. You dont have to be a geneticist to tell men from women

Cool, so going balls deep into this vagina is completely straight, then?

Technically if you like fucking really ugly chicks.

If you are attracted to dick you are gay
If you are attracted to manly features you are gay. What its so hard to comprehend?

So your argument is that secondary sex characteristics don't influence sexuality whatsoever, only primary (genitals) do, correct?

Its a bit of both see
You originally asked me to define a man. Not gay vs straight.

Jews want to fight and kill the white men population. So they make white men step by step gay. First by showing """""""women"""""" with penises, making the white men accept he just now fapped to dick. And step by step white men accepts more gayish things.
Fapping to cuckhold porn and interracial porn is the same thing.
And, at the same time, the more the white men faps, the lower gets his testosterone levels. Making him non aggressive, non motivated, dumb and lazy.
Meanwhile EU and NA get flooded by young, male immigrants with high test, to which the liberal girls are attracted too. Because of their aggressive, demanding behaviors, but also because their daddys lacked the discipline and manhood in the parenting of their daughters as well.

Maybe it's not the jews, though. But there is an interest in the dark. And no, it's not on Sup Forums because of that Sup Forums is something special. The agenda gets pushed literally everywhere.

The fact that you're literally giving a double standard as fact.

Your argument:
Male looking, make genitals = gay.
Male looking, female genitals = gay.
Female looking, female genitals = straight.
Female looking, male genitals = gay.

See why that's arbitrary and biased at best?
Of course you don't, because you're that biased.

Nope, I hopped in mid conversation.
And that argument is just plain wrong. See why here

Well that expains your confusion and
Is 100% correct

>Pretty much spells it out
>still claims to be confused

There are more gay people than you would think. You don't need to be a raging faggot to be gay. A lot of "normal" looking and acting men are also gay.

Sup Forums attracts many hundreds of thousands of users, of which there will be gays.

There's nothing arbitrary in it. You can get attracted to someone because of his female looking, but as soon as you see dick and accept it, you are gay.
If it's not off-putting to you that someone with female looking is, in fact, a man with a dick, then you are gay.
If you consider a female looking human, who is, in fact, a man with a dick, as a relationship and/or mating partner, you are gay.

It's just the way it is.

>doesn't see the objective double standard here
Your bias is making you look retarded. Have a nice day, anons. Don't eat too many crayons.

We all need a safe haven for our depraved fantasies sometimes, sir.

No, the arbitrary point is in deciding arbitrarily that attraction to anything but a female looking person female genitals is gay.
That's at BEST an appeal to purity (which is a fallacy) and at worst, willfully a double standard. It's blatantly biased either way.

>claims bias to justify being a faggot
If you like men it's ok user just admit it

>claims
>implying implications
I more than likely have some bisexual leanings. I'm not in denial about what my preferences are.
If you want to be willfully ignorant of logic, I can't really help you. You're just gonna continue to be the retard you are today.

The autism is strong with this one. If your bi your also gay

No cunt, there are homosexuals in /fit/


Sup Forums has faggots
OP is a faggot btw

>attraction to anything but a female looking person female genitals is gay.

Of course it is, lol.
C'mon man. Save up your buzzwords. But if you can fap to you are indeed a faggot.

>autism
user, pls. You're on Sup Forums. If you wanted all the autists off the site, there wouldn't be anyone left using it.
To spell it out: that means you, too.
Just because I'm worried it might have flown over your head.

>buzzwords
>logic and reason
I'm sure they're terrifying concepts for you, but words can't actually bite you, user. I'm sure if you ever used your brain, you might form an original idea eventually.

Hurr durr everyone is autistic user

The first stage is admitting it, user. If you google it, I'm sure even you will be able to find plenty of helpful links on how to live with it.

>Talks about using his brain
>cant comprehend simple subjects like gay vs straight

Interesting you said nothing to
>But if you can fap to you are indeed a faggot

Let that sink in, homo.
Straight is something 100%. You are either full in or out. All or nothing. That's what it's called straight. That's how men do it. Female looking and female genitals=female. Everything else=gay.
You only hide behind words, try to make it sound complicated, when it really is fucking simple. You are spouting around everyone is an idiot, but truth is, since you can't even grasp this simple concept of what is straight and what not - you are the idiot here.

>gay is anything I don't like
Seems legit, user. Fantastic proofs you have there.what a masterful intellect you were born with.

>my definition of straight is absolute and scientifically sound
I love playing spot the retard when you people make it this easy. It really is nice when you do all the work of outing yourself for me.

...

>Inserting arguments that were never mentioned to justify his own "argument"
Wew

>implying that isn't the basis of your definition of what is and isn't gay
If you can't see this, then good fucking luck.

There is only one definition. You kids nowadays think rules don't apply to you and you can change everything to suite you, make you feel comfortable, instead of realizing what it really is.
But that's not how the world works. It is not centered around you narcists. Have a nice day, faggot.

Because they are all OP

See
Fpr the definition of straight vs gay. If you fall into any of the other 3 catagories you are gay. Simple

>there is only one definition and it's a double standard appeal to purity fallacy
So, do you have to stop walking every time you chew your gum, or can your brain handle breathing at the same time, too?

>appeal to purity
>double standard
You still not recognizing the flaw? Do I need to copy and paste the definitions of why they're flawed for you to understand it?

There is no flaw here. You only wish there was to justify you being a huge faggot.

>neither of those are flaws
Good day.

Want me to make it even more simple for you?

I mean, I've fed you enough, really. I'm getting tired now, so I'm going to go to sleep.
Is it really a troll if the person knows and just doesn't care?