Sup Forums I've become red-pilled to a degree that I think I'm capable of preventing Google from fully implementing...

Sup Forums I've become red-pilled to a degree that I think I'm capable of preventing Google from fully implementing global communism.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0PoVzIJVo1I
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Google is not as much as they thing they are. There will be a few hundred Google duplicating their business model before the decade is out.

There are already companies, like Qwant or Bing doing it. They all practice the same methods based on a pagerank system which is based on "quality of hyperlinks".

It's not specifically google I'm worried about. It's the methods by which search engines deem certain pages "important" and thus bring them to the top of results.

you are a paranoid schizophrenic
and you are enabling him

When I've gained enough momentum, you'll look silly for saying that, as I'll likely link to this thread.

>It's not specifically google I'm worried about. It's the methods by which search engines deem certain pages "important" and thus bring them to the top of results.
Eventually, messengers, social networks and search engines will not be optimized under a single domain but a shared and distributed revenue model making any big domain become a dinosaur like mainframe computers. This happens in less than ten years. Bet against big domains.

nice tit

Not if I can fucking help it nignog.

Excellent. You are now ready for the final phase. All you must do is kill yourself and livestream it, and your mission will be complete. The communists will never see it coming.

>Not if I can fucking help it nignog.
You can't and I doubt if you have the money nor talent. The PayPal mafia sees it and is circling Mt. View like buzzards. I'm one of that scene.

Watson said the same thing and PCs ate Mainframes alive. Concentrating information like Google and Facebook eventually explodes into an unmanageable mess that only the broad open Internet can handle.

The staff at Google is already buckling and that is why I refused to hire on. Cash out on your stick options before the 2018 mid-term elections before the Trump Train wrecks Google and Facebook for anti-trust and collusion.

If not, you are on the loosing team and on the wrong side of history. Worst you are some fuck with an H-1B that'll be canceled before the end of this year.

To what degree does Sup Forums think Google's definition of importance matches the truest meaning of the word? In other words, how well do you think Google's results match what is actually important to you as an individual? Particularly taking into account journalistic reports of what is happening in our world today.

Social marketing and Google itself have given me the tools of their own destruction. You're damn right I don't have the money, but I have a model to proliferate based on honesty, trust, and complete and utter transparency. The truth will out. I'm not ready yet but the fire has been lit.

>google
>communism
???

also, you make the silly assumption that I would do this for profit and not on the grounds that it is the ethical thing to do, nevermind the emancipatory potential

>You're damn right I don't have the money, but I have a model to proliferate based on honesty, trust, and complete and utter transparency. The truth will out. I'm not ready yet but the fire has been lit.
Now get rid of yours socialist mindset and cash in or die.

This business model is going extinct quickly. Natural language voice search, with an AI providing direct answers, will fully replace the "page full of blue links" within 5 years. Silicon Valley already knows this -- that's why you see every major tech company trying to rush their half-ass "voice assistants" to market even when they suck -- Google Now, Alexa, Siri, Cortana, Watson, just to name a few. Whoever emerges on top of this current battle (looking like Amazon/Alexa at this point, possibly Microsoft/Cortana if they can get better traction with Windows 10 Cortana) will rule search for the next 10 years, and it's already looking like it probably won't be Google. Unless they can somehow leverage their Android/smartphone dominance to force a quick gain in data and market share.

You have my attention, but I don't understand what you mean by "shared and distributed revenue model." Can you explain more?

Good luck with that!

Not a socialist, a capitalist in fact. Social media marketing is the death knell of capitalism and of agency itself. Google is their platform, Bing and Qwant (EuroBing) are platforms. Again, you'll see why when I'm ready to launch.

I can tell you're not really sure what you're talking about but I'll respond in order to practice constant engagement with an audience.

The method of searching will change, yes. Websites, hosted on domains, are not going away any time soon. They are the digital real estate, the land on which things sit. Unless the internet is massively restructured soon(doubtful) my premise stands. As I said before the specific search engine doesn't matter they use similar methods that return equally unreliable (in terms of true importance) results.

Thanks!

To clean this up a bit, it would also be appropriate to include the word "applications"

I'm interested in more responses from this fella. Do you have any response to my posts?

i'm gay w/aids

I'm applying rudimentary social marketing on a very limited platform, and I'm doing it because I want people to know the truth. If anyone has questions or comments or additional wisdom please share.

I'll divulge some more. Google restructured their company in 2015 into a conglomerate of all their services, calling it Alphabet Inc. They own the advertisement platform and control the distribution of ads. So far they have been mostly egalitarian, but the re-distribution of labor is already happening. When you watch a youtube video you are literally working for Google, it's advertisers, and the content creator. We have some liberty in terms of what we work on (which videos we watch, what articles we read) but it is quickly dwindling.

Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg. They are all social constructionists. They have a moral vision in how their platforms will be used i.e. how people will work for them. They want to influence your behavior. They want to police your ideas. And they have no plans for you to ever EVER rise out of the proletariat

I don't think that's an awfully silly assumption.

Yeah you're right. But my needs are met. I have everything I need and more, and I'm below the poverty line. That alone says something about the inflated state of our purchasing power, a whole other matter of discussion.

youtube.com/watch?v=0PoVzIJVo1I