Nick Saban

>recruit a bunch of future NFL players
>do nothing but run the ball all season
>win natty
>be declared "greatest college football coach"

Recruiting is actually the only think that separates one college coach from another. The amount of negros you can bring to your team is the essential metric for success in CFB. Once you have the best players, you can just download a playbook off the Internet or just copy plays from Madden and still win. Being a good recruiter makes you a good coach in college, nothing else is relevant.

And the funny thing is, the school does the recruiting for you half the time. I don't think Nick Saban has to do much of anything to convince the top recruits to come to Alabama. They know they need to go their anyway if they want a chance at the next level.

are you retarded?

do you have any idea how bad bama was in the 90s?

this is wrong. there are plenty of teams with loaded rosters stocked with NFL players who can't win. Pitt in the 2000s had larry fitzgerald, durrell revis, shady mccoy, etc. Michigan during the 2000s, USC the last few years, Texas the last decade, you could list examples all day of loaded teams who couldn't win.
is also wrong.
is right. Go ask Don Shula's kid how easy it is to win at Bama

Basically every CFB Dynasty ever.

If it's so easy, how come no one else has his success?

Why can't he recruit good QBs if it's so easy? He dominates with jouneymen Qbs. Even more impressive.

While I agree with your point, Hurts looks like he's pretty good, possibly the best Saban has had to work with.

Why wasn't he successful in the nfl?

His heart was never in it for the short time he was there.

Kind of fuck ass excuse is that?

>Just being at a blue blood means you will win, and be dominant.

Alabama was in the toilet before Saban got there.

nigga he was .500 over two seasons. That was better than half the coaches at the time. He was fine, he just prefers college because you can be a fucking dictator

Was he really that bad in the NFL? Just looking up his results, he took over a 4-12 team and went 9-7. Then 6-10 the next year. Ferotte and Harrington were his gimpy QBs.

He doesn't need a QB that goes out and chucks it for 550 yards a game, with the offensive line that Bama can produce, their runners can dominate

Alabama is the epitome of the failing of the scholar/athlete. Most of that line consist of functioning retards. It's just that the SEC, and Saban, don't give a fuck. That's how they do so well each year.

If Saban, on his own merit and with his staff, was so good, he would have been dominate in the NFL. And we all known that wasn't what happened

There's a reason the SEC is known as the:
Seldom
Enters
Classroom
conference

Take bama out of the SEC and it is only the 3rd best conference on avg for the last 14 years

SEC has been so weak this year that IF bama gets to the natty they are getting ass-blasted by the Big 10 opponent; whomever it is.

Because he signed Culpepper instead of Brees. If Brees had went to Miami Saban would have won multiple ships in the league

>If Brees had went to Miami Saban would have won multiple ships in the league

Saban would have ruined him
Brees would not have bought into the BS

If Fran Tarkenton is to be believed, Saban is the busiest recruiter in the country. He was flying out to talk to recruits a few days after winning the title.

Source: KNBR interview

Best comment

Alabama = 6th highest in academic rankings in NCAA. Try again faggot.

Is this the most retarded thread on Sup Forums right now?

yes

Why are all the Texas teams so shit if recruiting is everything?

Say my name.