The left are trying to start a revolution because they are sore losers. The left also opposes guns and gun rights...

The left are trying to start a revolution because they are sore losers. The left also opposes guns and gun rights. Who will win? Pic Rightlated.

Other urls found in this thread:

cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/accidental-injury.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States
cbsnews.com/news/how-u-s-gun-deaths-compare-to-other-countries/
abcnews.go.com/US/abc-exclusive-500-gun-store-burglaries-expected-year/story?id=43861292
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

There is no "the left" on this one man. That includes frickin left leaning libertarians. But yeah if a bunch of sjws who oppose gun rights started a revolution they'd get squashed. Id be there with you and I voted for fuckin Bernie Sanders. Assult rifles, legal LSD and univeral healthcare. Sounds fucking great to me.

I stand corrected the "liberals"

...

>11,000 gunshot deaths per year
>300,000 obesity deaths per year
If guns are an epidemic, cheeseburgers are the apocalypse.

hehe

cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/accidental-injury.htm

31,959 falling deaths per year. You are 3 times more likely to fall to your death than be shot. When was the last time anybody was worried about falling?

a revolution does not necessarily need to be violent, besides it's always best to not make martyrs of monsters; don't forget that nixon, clinton, and jackson had impeachment trials preceding on a minor daily scandal of the trumpedency, and that hitler was also a right wing extremist.

Everybody loves that Big Black Carbine

RULE 34 THIS PLZ!

hook line and stinker

That's a good example.

How many people die from Migrant crime per year? Or from terrorism? hmmm not even double digits.

Well, scaling efforts by death count isn't a great idea. At least, that can't be the only factor. It's a lot more intrusive on freedom to limit firearm purchasing than food and exercise choices. And then there's the fact that gun crimes are actively prevented like terrorism... it's a big mess. Your point is still valid though, we really should care more about obesity. I say fix em all.

the left ?
-unless you can't read or look at newcasts,
it is Trump who is dividing your country, atm he's dividing republicans and conservatives
-if somebody's going to fight against anybody, it'll be you gun-weilding republicans fighting each other

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha................................................................

I corrected that stating the liberals.

cancer, heating failure, medical malpractice, inability to afford basic health expenses, air quality, bacterial infections, drug overdoses, malnourished environments and lifestyles, obesity, water quality, car fumes, and pretty much everything else kill in stacks way higher than guns, but nothing goes bang like a gun death on the media.

Weaponized autism can't be defeated, no gun can compete with that.

What The Fuck do you think small arms would do against an M1 Abrams tank?
A10 gun fortress?
Nuclear submarines?

Russia now says Maddow

And yet we're trying to fix all of those. Add gun deaths to the list. It's not line we do this shit one at a time. Hell, they're actually tied to other issues: poverty and organized crime.

Are you implying the pro-gun crowd is revolting here? The sjws would be doing it. Also: IEDs. The terrorists have been managing pretty fucking well against us if you haven't noticed. Yeah they die, but not a lot of them, and it's very costly. Plus we could actually get to our government, and plenty of the military would be split. It isn't all that far fetched depending on who revolts.

The liberals are actually the ones dividing the nation. Stop blaming the right or Trump.
No Republicans are calling their opposers racist, bigots, or sexist. No Conservatives are attacking innocent people who believe differently like the liberals do, or burn down their own communities.
No Republicans or Conservatives are fighting each other in the streets.

...

>The Left
>Liberals

Think for yourself for 30 seconds instead of just jumping on teams that have no real meaning.

Also
>Legal gun owners
No one is trying to take your guns.
All the laws and regulations people are proposing are about keeping guns out of the hands of people who are dangerous. And if you're a responsible gun owner, that isn't you.
Are you a felon? do you have a history of violence? do you have a history of mental instability? Are you the type of idiot who tosses a loaded weapon under their pillow when they have small kids in the house? THAT is who the background checks are meant to stop.
If you are a responsible adult. Own a gun. If you are someone who knows gun safety, Who treats guns with the proper care and caution that a deadly weapon deserves. Own a gun. Own 10 guns. Defend your family, go hunting, collect them just because you like the look. But your stupidity shouldn't put others in danger

It's kinda amazing how pissed off conservatives are considering they supposedly 'won'

>supposedly won
>won the election
pick one newfag

So nobody trying to ban an Ar15? or take away 30rd magazines? ...Notice I said "magazines" and not "clips".

google, microsoft and apple are on our side, flyover idiots are going to be hit from orbit by dronestrikes while theyre asleep

But youre acting so butthurt its almost like you lost

Republicans in 2017 are the epitome of sore winners

cuckservative gun owners are the worst. Theyve been so brainwashed by the NRA that the librals are coming for their guns.

you know why gun / background checks are a problem? it slows down gun sales. It fucks with gun shows. and the NRA voting fags are crazy about their guns. holy shit. No one wants to take away your guns ok?

We just think that, if you are so mentally disabled that someone else has control of your social security check... maybe you shouldn't have a gun. you know what? that was blocked by the NRA.

The only redeeming feature of guns is that having a gun in the house means that their dumb kid is more likely to kill themselves or one of their dumb hick friends. its a bit of a limit on their retarded gene pool.

>kid shoots up school
>give guns to the teachers!
>if every student was armed, the massacre wouldn't happen!

These are things that otherwise normal human beings say when they think muslim obama is comin' for them guns.

WHO LET GRANDPA ON Sup Forums AGAIN

>Inb4 liberals start protesting against gravity
>Articles on "racial bias" in gravity and fall related accidents.
>Falling will now be an act of white supremacy and overall racist.

>liberals
>leftists
Pick one

Sigh. They don't oppose the right to bear arms, they want it to be reasonably regulated. Shouldn't let retards have guns, plain and simple.

don't need a revolution when "fearless leader" is impeached.

b-b-but It's mah right

∴

>liberals
>leftists
>socialists
>communists
>gays
>muslims
>feminists
All interchangeable now in America's political "discussion"

What is the point of having political "discussions" if people dismiss other's ideas because they do not align with their own?

If people are sitting there yelling at the top of their lungs while ignoring what someone else is saying, what the fuck is the point? This is applicable to both left leaning and right leaning individuals.

>liberals
>socialists
>gays
>feminists

Unarmed.

>leftists
>communists
>muslims
>Niggers
>Mexicans

No so much

The point is to feel smug and superior to other people and also to be excited to feel like part of an important drama that interrupts our otherwise monotonous and pointless existence.

No idea why people really need an AR15 and 30 round mags... or clips... or whatever. Not really sure why anyone who doesn't live in bear/moose/wolf/rabid squirrel country would require an automatic wepon.

But hell, over 90% of fuckers with guns have never shot or threatened anyone with a gun. So yeah, whatever. Don't worry me none.

Pretty much. I don't understand why they are always bitching about liberals or whatever trying to take their guns away. People don't really give a fuck, but do want them to be regulated like anything else to keep them out of the hands of retards. If someone has mental health issues, why would anyone want it to be possible for them to easily get a gun?

Your post has not one piece of accurate info.

Go learn something, please.

Dunno about murican laws, but I'm not entirely sure the average diagnosed retard can easily get their hands on a legal gun.

I know here pretty much any conviction for violence or any medical history of any kind of retardness is an instaban on guns. Getting anything like that against you gets your guns taken and your licence revoked.

I mean its not like your going to win a civil war against the US Military with an ar15. When a tank pulls up in your street and points its cannon at your house how many bullets you got stashed or the capacity of your magazine means fuckall.

Uhhh we do know it, it is shown to us through every avoidable shooting that happens way too often in the US. We understand the majority of gun owners arent the problem and the restrictions those of us who are for more restrictions wouldn't strongly affect those people. Believe it or not I do not want to take all your guns.

Every state has its own gun laws. There are states in which there are no background checks and in which you don't need any permits to own a gun. Anyone, no matter how mentally unstable, can easily get access to a gun.

Whatever the case, that is their business. If the people in those states want it to be that way, why the fuck would I care if I live in California?

not everyone on the left opposes gun rights, or at least, not everyone on the left is silly enough not to have stocked up on arms for the revolution.

clever ones know the only way to stop rampant robber barons and republican kleptocrats is to shoot the fuckers.

So what restrictions would you like to see? And would you favour different gun laws for different states or would you prefer to see one set of laws for everywhere?

funny you should mention that - trump and co want to deregulate and loosen up on health and safety regulations that are designed to prevent deaths at work from falls and similar "accidental" deaths. and of course from pollution et al that the EPA covers.

>Hitler was a right wing extremist.
Big difference between left/right politics in Europe, and left/right politics in America.

Like most reasonable individuals, he probably doesn't give a fuck about laws in other sates. There are dozens of states, each their own laws. How the fuck would someone keep up with all of the different laws, and more importantly, why would they care if those laws don't affect them?

For how much conservatives bitch about liberals trying to take their freedom away, it seems to me like conservatives have too much power in this country. Just looks at the federal government: presidency is conservative, congress is conservative, and now the supreme court will be conservative because these fucks wanted more power. It is they that try to impose their will on the rest of us, not the other way around.(not a liberal, but an independent moderate tired of conservatives doing dumb shit)

I'll take the bait a bit here. I'm a staunch opposer of being hard left or hard right. I find that folks closer to the center TEND to be more reasonable in their beliefs. I've seen centered right and left wingers find common ground and calmly discuss their beliefs, where they both walk away with new insight into interpreting the world around us.


With that being said, if I had to place myself on either side, I'd probably side SLIGHTLY left just because I'm apathetic on fags (I don't care much for lesbians, but taht's because they're such tryhard douches, not because they eat carpet), and think that a fair and well regulated healthcare system could be benifical for the general public.


With all of that, I like guns. I've found that many hard left people also like guns. The only ones who hate guns are the fat red haired SJW's and their emasculated excuses for men that follow them around. Most Americans think guns kick ass. They go boom and make things go boom.

Although I think regulation could possibly help in making sure mentally ill folks who could possibly go on shooting sprees never have access to guns.

tl;dr I'm drunk adn rambling plz read and discuss

I would like to agree and allow back ground checks.

BUT after Sandyhook a local journalist used the FOIA to obtain the home address' of numerous legal owners and published the information.

This proved that our Government can not be trusted to protect the privacy of those who try to obey the law.

Thus i have moved back to a pure Second Amendment attitude. "Shall not be infringed!"

When folks like you prove that they can be trusted to register my information and then work to protect it and keep it out of the hands of those very same criminals that I am trying tro protect myself against? Then I might move back in to the back ground checks and register crowd.

Fact.
Over 70% of the US military are pro gun and constitution.

Prove me wrong...

Fuck you AR-15 hillbilly faggots

when's the last time a toddler took a cliff out of it's mum's purse and pushed her off it you twunt?

>All the laws and regulations people are proposing are about keeping guns out of the hands of people who are dangerous.
So we're going to leave it up to elected officials to determine who is dangerous? Sounds like thought crime to me. How bout this: Shall not be infringed. I don't give a flying squirrels testicle who is or isn't dangerous by your definition(or government's definition), because at the end of the day the REAL dangerous people with guns are the ones you give full sway to: Government officials.

Different laws for every states and I would only like to see 2 changes, gunshow loopholes closed and in states with less hunting and more shootings stronger checks on high powered rifles.

What a niggery ruined 1911

Just a question.

I see a lot of people saying 'more restrictions, more restrictions, I don't want to take your guns but we need more restrictions' without ever saying what sort of restrictions they'd want to see.

Its academic whether those laws are enforced at state or federal levels, we sure as shit aren't going to change anything here. I'm just curious to see what sort of things people think could work.

Guerilla warfare is actually quite effective.
It is why Afghanistan took a page from the US revolution and held the Russians at bay for more then 75 years.

>No idea why people really need an AR15 and 30 round mags... or clips... or whatever.
No idea why people really need free speech and privacy... or rights... or whatever.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

cbsnews.com/news/how-u-s-gun-deaths-compare-to-other-countries/

abcnews.go.com/US/abc-exclusive-500-gun-store-burglaries-expected-year/story?id=43861292

...

If anyone has video of this I'm interested.

this

I'm a right winger more than a left winger. And hell. I agree with you. So you're good, mate. I'm a only 3 shots in so I can't blame alcohol on it.

It's just common sense. Let's make the common sense party.

Meh it was a wall hanger.

You would not want to shoot a gold plated gun.

>liberals
>Unarmed

You keep on believing that.

>Muh red team is better than the blue team

Wow...that is one manly statue, look at the bulge. No homo. Where is this?

Yep, better red than dead

>common sense.
Not the user you replied to, but....

>common sense.
Is no longer common in fact is rare.

Else we would not need warning labels on screw drivers "Do not stick in eye..."


Pic is for you.

Yeah buddy. What makes you say you'd be more right wing? I'm curious to discuss shit with a reasonable user.

Also sadly I think common sense party would be infected by people who think that they are common sense, when really they're delusional. I think it's healthy to regularly question yourself and whether or not you're thinking clearly about things. People who are always cock-sure tend to be wrong.

> rights... freedoms.... whatever...

You have a right to own an AR15 and have 30 round mags and shit. I have a right to say I don't understand why you need them.

Freedom!!

The Alt-Right and the Extreme Left are both fucking morons.

The Left: I don't care if more than 99% of Gun Owners are responsible gun owners. Because of that less than 1% all guns need to go... but even though less than 1% of Muslims commit terrorism we have to fight for their rights of religion.


The Right: I don't care if more than 99% of Muslims commit no terrorism Because of that less than 1% all Muslims need to go... But even though less than 1% gun owners are irresponsible we need to fight for their right to bare arms.

problem is your right to claim we don't need them gets more of a platform. People like you need to learn when to exercise your right to remain silent

I like you, bud. But you need to point out more of the stupid shit both extreme sides do apart from guns and muslims. The right is still stooped in arcane Christian fundamentalism, even if the alt-right is mostly euphoric fedora wearing weebs. The left is just daddy issues that are trying SO HARD to rebel against any possible thing

But the second amendment is not the one that was being infringed....

Whatever the case, they just passed a bill that destroys our privacy by allowing isp to sell our fucking browsing information off. If anything, you should be supporting privacy, which is what is really at stake right now.

gucci

Fact. In a civil war such things take a back seat to shooting your enemies.

Look around at all those nations with Dictators. Fuck the US is supplying Syria with AR15's. This is why the US needs guns. The people need the power to stand up to a government if necessary. And don't give me the "The US will never have to worry about dictators or an evil government" BS.

So you saying the niggers in Chicago are democrats?

Are you talking about in America? Because if you average the attacks since September 11... It's hundreds.

A few comments down I also stated that it should be up to the residents of a state to decide on how they want to regulate firearms, or what laws they develop in general.

Why should I give a fuck about laws in the other 49 states when they don't affect me? It is more of a suggestion to people in those states to push for guns to be properly regulated to keep themselves safe, not to force them to adopt whatever ideas I might have on how guns should be regulated. There are states in which people can easily get guns, without any background checks, and in which people don't need permits. To me it makes sense to do background checks, but if people in those states are against it, then that is their business.

I do support privacy, along with all the other rights in the bill of rights.

Not sure why you would think I do not?

I was willing for a time to consider the reasons for registering. as I said in the post.
Now I am unwilling, as they have proven they can not be trusted with such information.

Oh sorry... I missed the part where I advocated taking your guns cos I don't see the need for them.

I thought I was being tolerant and understanding of your position while putting my own opinions out there.
My bad.

I'll try to limit my own freedoms so you can better exercise yours in the future.

You have no right to be a fag and shit. I have a right to say i dont understand why you want dick.

Dickdom!!!!

Voted Democrat since Johnson

yo who else hopes they port Dark Souls trilogy to Nintendo Switch? If they do, I might play through the atrocity that's DS2 again just because

Johnson selected all images with a storefront.

> force them to adopt whatever ideas I might have on how guns should be regulated

Who's talking about forcing? Throw a few ideas out, I ain't gonna judge. You want to see better regulations? Say so. You want it taken out of state hands and put into federal jurisdiction? Put it forward. Want to keep it state by state? Say so and say why. Encourage debate.

> mentioned it in later post
Sorry dude. Hard to tell who's who around here. Didn't realise that was you.

Now you're getting it!
Exercise those freedoms!
Don't think for a minute you don't have the right to express your rampant retardation!

>I thought I was being tolerant and understanding of your position while putting my own opinions out there. My bad.
Being tolerant of someones position doesn't mean throwing in an asterisk where you can pose your opinions in some passive aggressive way to claim the moral high ground. Fuck your opinion. Your rights to an opinion end where it causes someone else's rights to be infringed upon. Gun ownership and possession in all forms doesn't infringe on others rights, but opinions like yours do.