Does Sup Forums have the answer?

Does Sup Forums have the answer?

G: Don't overthink it.

100

$100

but what about the products she walked away with after paying for them with the money that was already in the register? Also the change she received.

2 hunnit

$100

The goods that she walked away with were worth $70.

130 USD as cash 70 USD worth of goods so 200 at total

She gave the stolen $100 back, and in effect, stole $70 worth of goods, and $30 change.

Therefore; she stole $100.

$30 + $70 worth of stock.

hahahhahahahahhahahahaha....

100

comes back n spends 70 of it, they give you 30 in change, still 100 dude... besides only a dumbass would go back to spend it at the same store..

Ambiguous question. Refuse to answer.

The store owner was a Jew and the lady was hired by him to steal from the register on camera for $30 so he could be reimbursed by his insurer.
The groceries were returned to a third-party associate of the grocer and were later restocked.
So the answer is A

The products cost money to the owner. Also by that logic, she stole 30$

$100.
In theory bits less than that because the costume goods sold is less than $70 anyways.

Basically she steals $100, gives it in exchange for $70 in product and $30 in change.

So cashier loses $100(-)to theft.
Receives that $100(+) back for goods at $70(-) and change of $30(-).

Totaled up that's -100+100-70-30=100

Fuck it, one dollar Bob

G. tree fiddy

The products may cost less than $70 to the owner himself, but he's still potentially lost $70 worth of sales.

This added with the $30 change, means he has effectively lost $100.

$100 or you're fucking retarded.
> inb4 "the cost of the product, not the sale price". The goods were 'worth' $70 to the owner.
> inb4 "the change". She gave the owner $100 for $70 worth of goods, the owner owes here change.
> inb4 "some other random bullshit". Fuck off faggot.

Copy / Pasta troll thread is stale.

Sage this shit. Let it die.

Im quite sure she stole 200. Giving the stolen 100 back doesnt matter since she exchanged it for another hundred's worth. Basically, 100 taken, then another 30 on top since she didn't have any money to start with except the stolen 100. So 130 in cash + 70 in goods.